<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Topics tagged with stack]]></title><description><![CDATA[A list of topics that have been tagged with stack]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/tags/stack</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:50:47 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.peptidecritic.com/tags/stack.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Dosing advice for healthy rat that wants to optimize]]></title><description><![CDATA[@yogipepp The easiest way is to search for the peptide using the search tool and look for research protocol.
@jackie great question.  SS-31 is for mitochondrial repair, so if you have metabolic dysfunction, this could be a good thing to research. MOTS-C is going to facilitate working harder longer. NAD+ will give you more energy. They all work on your mitochondria in different ways.  Josh Holyfield has a good video on this. I think he refers to it as the mechanic protocol.  Whether you need it or not depends on how you’re feeling, age, etc.
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/1195/dosing-advice-for-healthy-rat-that-wants-to-optimize</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/1195/dosing-advice-for-healthy-rat-that-wants-to-optimize</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ResearchCat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Research]]></title><description><![CDATA[Research for Epitalon should be cycled. Many conflicting ideas about dosage and duration. Some popular dosages say super low in the mcg range for 30 days, others 3-5mg every 2-3 days for 4 weeks.
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/1100/new-research</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/1100/new-research</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Foodstampede]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cognitive cycle during performance&#x2F;recovery cycle?]]></title><description><![CDATA[@tbone I started twice a day at .5mg. Did some experimenting and found .333mg  x2 a day to be effective. On bad days I do .5mg x2 a day.
After a pause in research I accidentally dosed 2mg at once and had no adverse effects other then being pain and inflammation free for a few hours after waking up. YMMV
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/1077/cognitive-cycle-during-performance-recovery-cycle</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/1077/cognitive-cycle-during-performance-recovery-cycle</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MyB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NAD+ Buffered vs non-Buffered]]></title><description><![CDATA[@ResearchCat This is exactly where I'm at...
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/1009/nad-buffered-vs-non-buffered</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/1009/nad-buffered-vs-non-buffered</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[WowwyZowwy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mixing mots-c and aod in same vial]]></title><description><![CDATA[Injection Site Reaction
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/985/mixing-mots-c-and-aod-in-same-vial</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/985/mixing-mots-c-and-aod-in-same-vial</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MyB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Invalid Date</pubDate></item></channel></rss>