<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Finnrick vs Vendor COA’s]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Browsing around the Finnrick site it struck me that in some cases there is a huge disparity between the purity stated on the vendor COA and the purity on the Finnrick COA.  Anybody know what’s going on with that?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/1048/finnrick-vs-vendor-coa-s</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:24:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/1048.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 23:31:19 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Finnrick vs Vendor COA’s on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 16:58:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/myb" aria-label="Profile: MyB">@<bdi>MyB</bdi></a> that makes sense. we've seen a vendor use krause for a new shipment recently and they tested 20% under on a few things. shot the samples over to jano and AFI and it tested within 3% of the expected fill.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3734</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3734</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 16:58:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Finnrick vs Vendor COA’s on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:14:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/randy" aria-label="Profile: randy">@<bdi>randy</bdi></a> this is the coa with the low reading, Lab E. <a href="https://www.finnrick.com/testing-certificate/retatrutide/ez-peptides/20260306-e-45yg2em" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.finnrick.com/testing-certificate/retatrutide/ez-peptides/20260306-e-45yg2em</a><br />
This batch (RET2412162025-12) was tested 6 times under Nexaph, lab E &amp; G, ranging 24-27mg. The lowest was lab E again. (Krause)</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3683</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3683</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MyB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 11:14:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Finnrick vs Vendor COA’s on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 03:48:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/myb" aria-label="Profile: MyB">@<bdi>MyB</bdi></a> did it say which lab was used for each test?</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3658</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3658</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 03:48:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Finnrick vs Vendor COA’s on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:09:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/randy" aria-label="Profile: randy">@<bdi>randy</bdi></a> i found three tests for the same batch of R24 that I own. Jano average was 27. Finn had a 27, 19, and one in between.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3631</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3631</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MyB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:09:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Finnrick vs Vendor COA’s on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:05:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/myb" aria-label="Profile: MyB">@<bdi>MyB</bdi></a> I take their testing seriously when something comes back as not whats claimed in the bottle. Beyond that i dont.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3630</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3630</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:05:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Finnrick vs Vendor COA’s on Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:05:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I was looking today and found a batch of peptide tested from 19mg to 27mg. I then found a statement of correction for one vendor who protested. That correction was for that vendor only but it makes me question other tests due to the machine not being within calibration<br />
<img src="/assets/uploads/files/1776038652971-img_6680.jpeg" alt="IMG_6680.jpeg" class=" img-fluid img-markdown" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3628</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.peptidecritic.com/post/3628</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MyB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:05:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>