Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Vendor Reviews & Orders
  3. What testing labs do we currently trust?
Prize
Peptide Critic Case and Pens
Ends in
3814 entries · 1657 participants
Enter →

What testing labs do we currently trust?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vendor Reviews & Orders
29 Posts 10 Posters 1.3k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M mikebricker

    Krause Analytical. They have been bad mouthed here by some with 2nd or 3rd party semi-negative comments. None that I’ve seen were first hand knowledge. Below is from a SubStack article ranking testing labs. Krause was ranked 5th, above Kovera, ILS, and TrustPoint.

    ——————————————————-
    Krause Analytical has established a strong reputation for peptide identity, purity and quantitative testing, becoming a familiar name within the independent research peptide community.

    Although it maintains a lower public profile than some of the higher-ranked laboratories, its reports appear regularly across the market and its services remain closely aligned with the practical needs of peptide researchers and suppliers.

    Its visibility is also enhanced through its role as one of the independent analytical laboratories used by the Finnrick testing platform, extending the reach of its analytical work to a broader community of researchers seeking third-party verification.

    Rather than relying on a highly visible public brand, Krause has built its reputation through consistent analytical performance, steady market adoption and its contribution to independent peptide testing.

    Current assessment: A dependable peptide-focused laboratory with growing recognition, consistent market adoption and an important role in supporting independent peptide verification.

    https://peptidesweekly.substack.com/p/an-independent-guide-to-the-laboratories?r=3pkpze&utm_medium=ios

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Stevepep
    wrote last edited by Stevepep
    #11

    @mikebricker I have a sneaky suspicion that that article may be turned on its head in the near future. By the way, I have no horse in this race i just want to see labs do their job and test at a high level. If Krause is accurate with their testing I am all for spending 60-70pct less. No Vanguard is interesting in that article and Freedom while we all know about them. Essentially an AI produced article with a ranking based on nothing. The author simply could have used each lab and tested vials from the same batch and compared results. Maybe we will see someone do that in the near future. hmmmm

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • BeeKindB Offline
      BeeKindB Offline
      BeeKind
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      Screenshot 2026-09-23 112041.png

      Just someone with a fridge full of research and a browser history that would concern my doctor.

      M D 2 Replies Last reply
      -1
      • BeeKindB BeeKind

        Screenshot 2026-09-23 112041.png

        M Offline
        M Offline
        mitchmiller
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @BeeKind except ILS isn’t accredited for peptides. Their ISO is for cannabis so this isn’t even a valid chart you have here.

        BeeKindB 2 Replies Last reply
        3
        • M mitchmiller

          @BeeKind except ILS isn’t accredited for peptides. Their ISO is for cannabis so this isn’t even a valid chart you have here.

          BeeKindB Offline
          BeeKindB Offline
          BeeKind
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @mitchmiller This chart came from Krysia https://krysia0430.substack.com/p/the-iso-logo-is-not-enough-is-your

          Just someone with a fridge full of research and a browser history that would concern my doctor.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M mitchmiller

            @BeeKind except ILS isn’t accredited for peptides. Their ISO is for cannabis so this isn’t even a valid chart you have here.

            BeeKindB Offline
            BeeKindB Offline
            BeeKind
            wrote last edited by BeeKind
            #15

            @mitchmiller it is valid because they are ISO accredited - that's what that means and they DO NOT have a peptide scope- as shown on the chart. No one is accredited for peptides.

            Just someone with a fridge full of research and a browser history that would concern my doctor.

            RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Stevepep

              @dispensarysupport test results I would think.

              D Offline
              D Offline
              dispensarysupport
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @Stevepep said:

              @dispensarysupport test results I would think.

              nice 30k ft view but how do we tell who is "best"? Like if we just want all of our tests results to come in at 99.5% or better we are best to use Freedom I feel. If we want legit critically tested product that we may or may not use on our very own lab rats, I want an unbiased lab that will give it to me straight with no bullshit.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Stevepep

                @mikebricker I have a sneaky suspicion that that article may be turned on its head in the near future. By the way, I have no horse in this race i just want to see labs do their job and test at a high level. If Krause is accurate with their testing I am all for spending 60-70pct less. No Vanguard is interesting in that article and Freedom while we all know about them. Essentially an AI produced article with a ranking based on nothing. The author simply could have used each lab and tested vials from the same batch and compared results. Maybe we will see someone do that in the near future. hmmmm

                D Offline
                D Offline
                dispensarysupport
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @Stevepep said:

                @mikebricker I have a sneaky suspicion that that article may be turned on its head in the near future. By the way, I have no horse in this race i just want to see labs do their job and test at a high level. If Krause is accurate with their testing I am all for spending 60-70pct less. No Vanguard is interesting in that article and Freedom while we all know about them. Essentially an AI produced article with a ranking based on nothing. The author simply could have used each lab and tested vials from the same batch and compared results. Maybe we will see someone do that in the near future. hmmmm

                But again, who are we going to decide is RIGHT if we send the same product from a kit to all the labs? The only way to ensure they get the same product is to literally have them all taking product to test from the same vial. I think even lately we have seen that different vials in the same kit can give varying results.

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • BeeKindB BeeKind

                  Screenshot 2026-09-23 112041.png

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  dispensarysupport
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @BeeKind said:

                  Screenshot 2026-09-23 112041.png

                  LOL @ ILS being a measuring stick for anything. They are an absolute mess of a lab and have all of their employees working virtual. Absolute worst customer service and testing turn time of any lab in the field. Bottom of any list is the only place they should be.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • S Stevepep

                    @dispensarysupport I have a feeling we may be getting our answer on which labs we can trust pretty soon based on actual testing.

                    RandyR Offline
                    RandyR Offline
                    Randy
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @Stevepep ive heard a similar rumor

                    Accumark is very questionable.

                    ILS....has issues

                    Freedom.... im done with them.

                    Trustpointe is solid.

                    "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • BeeKindB BeeKind

                      @mitchmiller it is valid because they are ISO accredited - that's what that means and they DO NOT have a peptide scope- as shown on the chart. No one is accredited for peptides.

                      RandyR Offline
                      RandyR Offline
                      Randy
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @BeeKind exactly.

                      the ISO 17025 accreditation is just a general lab standard. Its not hard to get and it has no bearing on a labs ability to test peptides.

                      "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • RandyR Offline
                        RandyR Offline
                        Randy
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        also some light reading.

                        https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/horizon-analytical-and-case-missing-third-party
                        https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/ils-labs-cant-fill-out-pdf-please-trust-science
                        https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/ils-labs-finds-100-pure-retatrutide-chemistry-can-go-home-now
                        https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/accumark-lab-selling-transparency-forgot-explain-who-they-are
                        https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/9977-mots-c-100-good-boy-ils-labs-issues-certificate-animalysis
                        https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/sterigenix-analytical-fast-coas-missing-basics

                        "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • M mikebricker

                          Krause Analytical. They have been bad mouthed here by some with 2nd or 3rd party semi-negative comments. None that I’ve seen were first hand knowledge. Below is from a SubStack article ranking testing labs. Krause was ranked 5th, above Kovera, ILS, and TrustPoint.

                          ——————————————————-
                          Krause Analytical has established a strong reputation for peptide identity, purity and quantitative testing, becoming a familiar name within the independent research peptide community.

                          Although it maintains a lower public profile than some of the higher-ranked laboratories, its reports appear regularly across the market and its services remain closely aligned with the practical needs of peptide researchers and suppliers.

                          Its visibility is also enhanced through its role as one of the independent analytical laboratories used by the Finnrick testing platform, extending the reach of its analytical work to a broader community of researchers seeking third-party verification.

                          Rather than relying on a highly visible public brand, Krause has built its reputation through consistent analytical performance, steady market adoption and its contribution to independent peptide testing.

                          Current assessment: A dependable peptide-focused laboratory with growing recognition, consistent market adoption and an important role in supporting independent peptide verification.

                          https://peptidesweekly.substack.com/p/an-independent-guide-to-the-laboratories?r=3pkpze&utm_medium=ios

                          RandyR Offline
                          RandyR Offline
                          Randy
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          @mikebricker Krause results vary by who was running the lab that day.

                          Send them the same batch of reta 3 weeks apart and you get a 20-30% difference in mass. They usually test lower on mass numbers than most labs. Their entire identity is around finnrick which is an entirely different discussion.

                          "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • RandyR Randy

                            @mikebricker Krause results vary by who was running the lab that day.

                            Send them the same batch of reta 3 weeks apart and you get a 20-30% difference in mass. They usually test lower on mass numbers than most labs. Their entire identity is around finnrick which is an entirely different discussion.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            mikebricker
                            wrote last edited by mikebricker
                            #23

                            @Randy Thanks. I’ve seen the past complaints about the mass differences. And my peps always seem to be about 5 to 10% low in mass. So a 10mg posted will come back 9.3 to 9.7mg. But they do ID correctly and give purity correctly. And they’re consistent with mass.
                            When you guys ran mass through the various labs weren’t the differences well over 10%?

                            RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M mikebricker

                              @Randy Thanks. I’ve seen the past complaints about the mass differences. And my peps always seem to be about 5 to 10% low in mass. So a 10mg posted will come back 9.3 to 9.7mg. But they do ID correctly and give purity correctly. And they’re consistent with mass.
                              When you guys ran mass through the various labs weren’t the differences well over 10%?

                              RandyR Offline
                              RandyR Offline
                              Randy
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              @mikebricker https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/why-test-results-vary-between-labs-multi-lab-coa-comparison

                              "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • RandyR Randy

                                @mikebricker https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/why-test-results-vary-between-labs-multi-lab-coa-comparison

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                mikebricker
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                @Randy exactly, a low of 10.1mg and a high of 12.9mg. That’s over a 20% differential….

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M mitchmiller

                                  @dispensarysupport I saw thats tudz was using vanguard but didn’t know much about them. What places them high up on your list?

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  dispensarysupport
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  mitchmiller said:

                                  @dispensarysupport I saw thats tudz was using vanguard but didn’t know much about them. What places them high up on your list?

                                  I like Dustin and probably watch him field a dozen or more technical questions weekly by other lab people and he is always very dialed in.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • D dispensarysupport

                                    I am pretty involved in the lab community and follow most of the lab owners as they discuss lab things. In order of how I trust them based on their knowledge and experience.

                                    Janoshik
                                    Vanguard
                                    Amino Metrics (for GH)
                                    Chromate
                                    BT Labs
                                    Accumark
                                    AFI
                                    MZBIO
                                    Freedom
                                    Kovera
                                    ILS

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    coby
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27

                                    @dispensarysupport. be interesting to compare pricing

                                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • P Offline
                                      P Offline
                                      Peptheon team
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      Disclosure first: I work with Peptheon, so read this as a supplier's answer rather than a neutral
                                      one.

                                      On the question itself — the lab's name matters less than whether the report resolves from the
                                      lab's own domain for the batch printed on your box. Three checks catch most of what passes for
                                      documentation: the batch number on the packaging matches the number on the report; the report is
                                      served from the lab's own domain rather than a screenshot somebody posted; and the values come with
                                      units and a method, not a bare percentage.

                                      Being straight about our own line: we publish batch documentation only where the manufacturer
                                      publishes a lab report. Nordic Peptides, who make the retatrutide we sell, publish none, so that
                                      product page carries no certificate rather than one we cannot back — send us your order number and
                                      the batch printed on your box and we will request that batch's paperwork and tell you either way
                                      what came back. The retatrutide is sold as sealed manufacturer pens, we ship within the EU only,
                                      tracked delivery with one flat €20.00 fulfillment and delivery fee per order regardless of order
                                      size:
                                      https://peptheon.eu/products/nordic-retatrutide?utm_source=community.peptidecritic.com&utm_medium=community&utm_campaign=geo-e2

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C coby

                                        @dispensarysupport. be interesting to compare pricing

                                        D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        dispensarysupport
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #29

                                        @coby said:

                                        @dispensarysupport. be interesting to compare pricing

                                        I never have to be honest. I just always guesstimate $200-250 and $400 if you want endo.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0

                                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                        Register Login
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups