Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community

Peptide Critic Community

  1. Randy the Rats Research Forum
  2. Peptide Categories
  3. Weight Management Peptides
  4. Reta & kidney studies
March 2026 Contest
Time remaining:
6611 total entries 1000 participants
View Contest

Reta & kidney studies

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Weight Management Peptides
14 Posts 4 Posters 375 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MyBM Offline
    MyBM Offline
    MyB
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    I finally found it. It was the Rosenstock 2023 study that studied .5mg and took eGFR recordings. The Jastreboff 2023 study took readings too and this study seems to be the one everyone sites. The Urva 2022 study did not take eGFR records

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • MyBM Offline
      MyBM Offline
      MyB
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      This is the Baylor article that lists the data for all three studies
      https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12026077/pdf/UBMC_38_2456441.pdf

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Offline
        D Offline
        diegoc
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        All i can say that my best friend is a kidney specialist and GLPs is the #1 peptide other than Jardiance and Farxiga they prescribe to everyone.

        She uses Reta but doesn’t subscribe it yet because its not approved.

        Are you looking for contradictions?

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • MyBM Offline
          MyBM Offline
          MyB
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          The two studies both show reduced kidney function at 8mg, and have contradictory results at low doses.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Offline
            D Offline
            diegoc
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            In my opinion, i take the highest dose i can take that you can meet your macros.

            It makes no sense you take 8mg if you cant eat, by fixing 1 thing you break 2.

            The studies on GLPs are mainly done for ppl over weight so yes they use high doses, but i guarantee that even at lower doses it helps with many things, lipids,insulin, heart, kidneys and probably a ton of other things.

            The studies are also done with compliance in mind such as dosing frequency, imaging Elly telling everyone to take a daily Subq shot or even lower doses.

            They need high doses and less frequency to sell…

            I take 2mg a week split 3x M, W, F and im not doing it for weight loss.

            As @randy Jeff has his views of Reta, the glucagon is the retain muscle component however Tirz is a great GLP and works as well as long as you can meet your daily macros.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • MyBM Offline
              MyBM Offline
              MyB
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Primary will only scribe sema and refuses to scribe tirz w/o t2d. Kidney cancer was determined metabolic because the subject was morbidly obese. Subject does weight resistance 5x a week and currently meets all macros but still has fatty liver and insulin resistance after one year.
              Thank you for your input. Just trying to do as much research as possible to not cause additional damage to remaining kidney. The fatty liver and insulin resistance will more likely do more damage than the Reta ever would is my current theory.

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • P Offline
                P Offline
                PeptideEd
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                @myb I would also highly recommend running your own labs at https://www.ultalabtests.com/partners/peptidecritic - its typically cheaper than via insurance and lets you track your own health aggressively.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • MyBM MyB

                  Primary will only scribe sema and refuses to scribe tirz w/o t2d. Kidney cancer was determined metabolic because the subject was morbidly obese. Subject does weight resistance 5x a week and currently meets all macros but still has fatty liver and insulin resistance after one year.
                  Thank you for your input. Just trying to do as much research as possible to not cause additional damage to remaining kidney. The fatty liver and insulin resistance will more likely do more damage than the Reta ever would is my current theory.

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  diegoc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  @MyB Tirz or Reta will definitely help with fatty liver and i so i see more reward than risk

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • MyBM Offline
                    MyBM Offline
                    MyB
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Just dropping information for anyone else in the future. I spent the day on clinical study sites. The people that were in the low dose studies of .5 and 1 had DKD (diabetic kidney disease). One group had starting eGFR >30 and another had >50. For reference a good eGFR is 90. The averages when completed were in the higher 80’s. I found a peer review of Reta and Tirz. Both are recommended for patients with DKD to improve function.

                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • P Offline
                      P Offline
                      PeptideEd
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      @myb thank you for sharing that info. I'd had the vague notion that reta improved kidney disease... but admit to not having chased it down thoroughly.

                      One other thing to be aware of (you probably know, but others may not) is there are two ways to measure eGFR - the traditional computes it from Creatinine and the other from cystatin c. Cystatin C is usually considered to be more reliable... but always run it with inflammation markers like hscrp. The reason is that cystatin C can be thrown off by chronic inflammation in a way that will tank the eGFR calculated from it. I usually run both for this reason.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • MyBM MyB

                        Just dropping information for anyone else in the future. I spent the day on clinical study sites. The people that were in the low dose studies of .5 and 1 had DKD (diabetic kidney disease). One group had starting eGFR >30 and another had >50. For reference a good eGFR is 90. The averages when completed were in the higher 80’s. I found a peer review of Reta and Tirz. Both are recommended for patients with DKD to improve function.

                        T Offline
                        T Offline
                        Ttia318i
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        @MyB Tesamorelin with Ipamorelin helps with visceral fat and fatty liver. I’m not sure of its effect on renal function but it’s definitely works to decrease abdominal girth. Worked for me and I had fatty liver a visceral fat that I couldn’t drop. Good luck

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • MyBM Offline
                          MyBM Offline
                          MyB
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Thank you for sharing your research experience.
                          Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) promote growth and survival of many types of tumor cells. They are not in consideration at this time due to male 🐀 subjects cancer history.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups