Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Vendor Reviews & Orders
  3. Flawless Compound Retatrutide (Reta) – Replacement Vial Even Worse Than the First (Cloudy + Undissolved White Gel)
Prize
Peptide Critic Case and Pens
Ends in
3814 entries · 1657 participants
Enter →

Flawless Compound Retatrutide (Reta) – Replacement Vial Even Worse Than the First (Cloudy + Undissolved White Gel)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vendor Reviews & Orders
88 Posts 16 Posters 7.9k Views 1 Watching
Flawless Compound Retatrutide (Reta) – Replacement Vial Even Worse Than the First (Cloudy + Undissolved White Gel) Flawless Compound Retatrutide (Reta) – Replacement Vial Even Worse Than the First (Cloudy + Undissolved White Gel) Flawless Compound Retatrutide (Reta) – Replacement Vial Even Worse Than the First (Cloudy + Undissolved White Gel) Flawless Compound Retatrutide (Reta) – Replacement Vial Even Worse Than the First (Cloudy + Undissolved White Gel) Flawless Compound Retatrutide (Reta) – Replacement Vial Even Worse Than the First (Cloudy + Undissolved White Gel)
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MJ227M MJ227

    @Eleanor The pictures don't lie. So maybe they should change there name to "Imperfect compounds". Glad you had a better experience but everything I've received has been throw in the trash.

    E Offline
    E Offline
    Eleanor
    wrote last edited by
    #25

    @MJ227 I fully understand your experience. If it happened to me, I'd feel the same way.

    Proud to be on a gubmint watch list

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • MJ227M MJ227

      @Eleanor The pictures don't lie. So maybe they should change there name to "Imperfect compounds". Glad you had a better experience but everything I've received has been throw in the trash.

      E Offline
      E Offline
      Eleanor
      wrote last edited by
      #26

      @MJ227 Did Flawless compensate you, other than with another bad batch?

      Proud to be on a gubmint watch list

      MJ227M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • MJ227M MJ227

        This post is deleted!

        bfullerB Offline
        bfullerB Offline
        bfuller
        wrote last edited by bfuller
        #27

        @MJ227 I would try asking them for a replacement from a different batch, like one thats more recent that has ILS lab COA's - Ask for the July batch - FL-010207 or get them to reconstitude to verify your findings.

        Flawaless was very reasonable when I dealt with them on shipping issues and provided them the evidence. It seems strange Freedom tested it at 99.9% purity and passed the endotoxin screen.

        You would think a lab would report this back to the venddor when they do the testing?

        S MJ227M 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • bfullerB bfuller

          @MJ227 I would try asking them for a replacement from a different batch, like one thats more recent that has ILS lab COA's - Ask for the July batch - FL-010207 or get them to reconstitude to verify your findings.

          Flawaless was very reasonable when I dealt with them on shipping issues and provided them the evidence. It seems strange Freedom tested it at 99.9% purity and passed the endotoxin screen.

          You would think a lab would report this back to the venddor when they do the testing?

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Stevepep
          wrote last edited by
          #28

          @bfuller While we know ILS has had some issues, maybe rushing through testing to try and catch up so they keep the business. The Kovera thread is so interesting to me because it's what I have been hearing from the equipment manufacturers. Anyone can buy the equipment, but then you have to know how to use it. These guys are starting a business, buying equipment, and learning on the run. HPLC is fairly simple, but there are steps that can easily screw it up. Endotoxins and Heavy Metals: I have a bridge to sell you if you think all these results are accurate. Depending on the sterility test, those are fairly easy to perform but also require a sterile environment, not your basement or some office complex. It is very costly to have a sterile, temperature- and humidity-controlled environment without cross-contamination with proper filtration.

          Look, people are using a two week lab because getting stuff tested is taking too long. See the STutz thread.

          bfullerB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Eleanor

            @MJ227 Did Flawless compensate you, other than with another bad batch?

            MJ227M Offline
            MJ227M Offline
            MJ227
            wrote last edited by
            #29

            @Eleanor No, those photos are actually of the replacement they sent. I emailed them the pictures, and their only response was that I had already received my one free replacement. I replied requesting a full refund, and since then they've completely ignored me.
            The only thing "Flawless" about them is how flawlessly they send out a poor-quality product and then refuse to stand behind it or refund their customers. I won't be ordering from them again.

            E 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • bfullerB bfuller

              @MJ227 I would try asking them for a replacement from a different batch, like one thats more recent that has ILS lab COA's - Ask for the July batch - FL-010207 or get them to reconstitude to verify your findings.

              Flawaless was very reasonable when I dealt with them on shipping issues and provided them the evidence. It seems strange Freedom tested it at 99.9% purity and passed the endotoxin screen.

              You would think a lab would report this back to the venddor when they do the testing?

              MJ227M Offline
              MJ227M Offline
              MJ227
              wrote last edited by
              #30

              @bfuller That would've been a great idea. The problem is Flawless completely stopped responding once I asked for a full refund.
              What's also strange is that the replacement came from a different batch than my original order, and they even changed the product name between the first and second batches. The first batch reconstituted cloudy. The second batch, though, turned into the soapy, gel-like substance you see in the pictures.
              Something just doesn't add up. When a company stops responding the moment you ask for a refund, it definitely makes me think they know there's an issue with the product.

              S bfullerB 2 Replies Last reply
              1
              • S Stevepep

                @bfuller While we know ILS has had some issues, maybe rushing through testing to try and catch up so they keep the business. The Kovera thread is so interesting to me because it's what I have been hearing from the equipment manufacturers. Anyone can buy the equipment, but then you have to know how to use it. These guys are starting a business, buying equipment, and learning on the run. HPLC is fairly simple, but there are steps that can easily screw it up. Endotoxins and Heavy Metals: I have a bridge to sell you if you think all these results are accurate. Depending on the sterility test, those are fairly easy to perform but also require a sterile environment, not your basement or some office complex. It is very costly to have a sterile, temperature- and humidity-controlled environment without cross-contamination with proper filtration.

                Look, people are using a two week lab because getting stuff tested is taking too long. See the STutz thread.

                bfullerB Offline
                bfullerB Offline
                bfuller
                wrote last edited by bfuller
                #31

                @Stevepep Yeah testing is only as good as the lab testing procedures and repeatability.

                ILS isn't just s pop up lab it was incorporated in 2018. A California Department of Cannabis Control filing shows that ILS submitted a cannabis testing laboratory license application on December 8, 2018, for its facility at 8222 Vickers St., Suite 106, San Diego which was granted. Then they branched out into supplements, APIs and other revenue streams including probably the biggest current market beautiful peptides!

                I'm not sure if you've seen this but it is from Derek Decoded, he did a tour of Jano and ILS. Pretty interesting stuff.

                This is the ILS tour you can see the Jano tour on Dereks channel too.

                Inside ILS Labs (San Diego, CA) - Full Walkthrough

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • MJ227M MJ227

                  @Eleanor No, those photos are actually of the replacement they sent. I emailed them the pictures, and their only response was that I had already received my one free replacement. I replied requesting a full refund, and since then they've completely ignored me.
                  The only thing "Flawless" about them is how flawlessly they send out a poor-quality product and then refuse to stand behind it or refund their customers. I won't be ordering from them again.

                  E Offline
                  E Offline
                  Eleanor
                  wrote last edited by
                  #32

                  @MJ227 If they did that to me, I'd do the same as you, plus a bit more hellraising. (I'm a Scot, we do that...)

                  Proud to be on a gubmint watch list

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • bfullerB bfuller

                    @Stevepep Yeah testing is only as good as the lab testing procedures and repeatability.

                    ILS isn't just s pop up lab it was incorporated in 2018. A California Department of Cannabis Control filing shows that ILS submitted a cannabis testing laboratory license application on December 8, 2018, for its facility at 8222 Vickers St., Suite 106, San Diego which was granted. Then they branched out into supplements, APIs and other revenue streams including probably the biggest current market beautiful peptides!

                    I'm not sure if you've seen this but it is from Derek Decoded, he did a tour of Jano and ILS. Pretty interesting stuff.

                    This is the ILS tour you can see the Jano tour on Dereks channel too.

                    Inside ILS Labs (San Diego, CA) - Full Walkthrough

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stevepep
                    wrote last edited by Stevepep
                    #33

                    @bfuller I am aware they started in cannabis with very different equipment. He actually gave an interview and admitted he was new. I am also actually familiar with the equipment used to test heavy metals and endotoxins. I was in the business and still am in a highly regulated industry. It takes specialty training to operate the equipment and THE RIGHT ENVIRONMENT. Meaning a completely sterile environment, or you can very easily have false positives or negatives. Yes, I have seen the videos; I will leave it at that. For Cannabis, none of that is necessary.

                    At the moment, there are people, including me, with testing sitting at ILS, and we have no communication at all with the lab. They overpromised and now are way behind, and that's an issue for a small business when they try to catch up; crap happens. Unfortunately, it has. Training is the main issue with labs and fast growth; processes get missed, people mislabel items, the list goes on. I am a fan of ILS. I recommended them on here, gave out their discount code, and really liked them. It's good until it isn't. That doesn't mean it can't get fixed, but for now, be careful. That's all I am saying.

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • MJ227M MJ227

                      @bfuller That would've been a great idea. The problem is Flawless completely stopped responding once I asked for a full refund.
                      What's also strange is that the replacement came from a different batch than my original order, and they even changed the product name between the first and second batches. The first batch reconstituted cloudy. The second batch, though, turned into the soapy, gel-like substance you see in the pictures.
                      Something just doesn't add up. When a company stops responding the moment you ask for a refund, it definitely makes me think they know there's an issue with the product.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stevepep
                      wrote last edited by
                      #34

                      @MJ227 Big Yikes

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • MJ227M MJ227

                        @bfuller That would've been a great idea. The problem is Flawless completely stopped responding once I asked for a full refund.
                        What's also strange is that the replacement came from a different batch than my original order, and they even changed the product name between the first and second batches. The first batch reconstituted cloudy. The second batch, though, turned into the soapy, gel-like substance you see in the pictures.
                        Something just doesn't add up. When a company stops responding the moment you ask for a refund, it definitely makes me think they know there's an issue with the product.

                        bfullerB Offline
                        bfullerB Offline
                        bfuller
                        wrote last edited by
                        #35

                        @MJ227 oof I was just going to try their Reta too, everything else has been good. Maybe I'll stick to Atomik and my Canadian sources for that.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • bfullerB Offline
                          bfullerB Offline
                          bfuller
                          wrote last edited by
                          #36

                          @gym.rat Thanks for the tip!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Stevepep

                            @bfuller I am aware they started in cannabis with very different equipment. He actually gave an interview and admitted he was new. I am also actually familiar with the equipment used to test heavy metals and endotoxins. I was in the business and still am in a highly regulated industry. It takes specialty training to operate the equipment and THE RIGHT ENVIRONMENT. Meaning a completely sterile environment, or you can very easily have false positives or negatives. Yes, I have seen the videos; I will leave it at that. For Cannabis, none of that is necessary.

                            At the moment, there are people, including me, with testing sitting at ILS, and we have no communication at all with the lab. They overpromised and now are way behind, and that's an issue for a small business when they try to catch up; crap happens. Unfortunately, it has. Training is the main issue with labs and fast growth; processes get missed, people mislabel items, the list goes on. I am a fan of ILS. I recommended them on here, gave out their discount code, and really liked them. It's good until it isn't. That doesn't mean it can't get fixed, but for now, be careful. That's all I am saying.

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Commander
                            wrote last edited by
                            #37

                            @Stevepep
                            Ya, iLS is real late with my test results… I think they got to big to fast. On to the next lab for me

                            Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • RandyR Randy

                              @MJ227 TFA salt not being washed away properly when making the api.

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Steiny
                              wrote last edited by
                              #38

                              @Randy (Does filtering the peptides as you recommend help address the salt-related issue? If a peptide appears cloudy after reconstitution, is that enough reason to discard it rather than use it? I placed a larger order after seeing your sale mentioned with Flawless, so I’m now wondering whether I may have made a significant blunder lol)

                              bfullerB RandyR MJ227M 3 Replies Last reply
                              1
                              • S Steiny

                                @Randy (Does filtering the peptides as you recommend help address the salt-related issue? If a peptide appears cloudy after reconstitution, is that enough reason to discard it rather than use it? I placed a larger order after seeing your sale mentioned with Flawless, so I’m now wondering whether I may have made a significant blunder lol)

                                bfullerB Offline
                                bfullerB Offline
                                bfuller
                                wrote last edited by
                                #39

                                @Steiny Keep us posted on your findings please. I'm interested as all the stuff I have gotten so far has been solid from Flawless Compounds. The MOTS-C is top notch so far, GHK and BPC is solid too.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • S Steiny

                                  @Randy (Does filtering the peptides as you recommend help address the salt-related issue? If a peptide appears cloudy after reconstitution, is that enough reason to discard it rather than use it? I placed a larger order after seeing your sale mentioned with Flawless, so I’m now wondering whether I may have made a significant blunder lol)

                                  RandyR Offline
                                  RandyR Offline
                                  Randy
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #40

                                  @Steiny No. If it clouds toss it.

                                  "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • S Steiny

                                    @Randy (Does filtering the peptides as you recommend help address the salt-related issue? If a peptide appears cloudy after reconstitution, is that enough reason to discard it rather than use it? I placed a larger order after seeing your sale mentioned with Flawless, so I’m now wondering whether I may have made a significant blunder lol)

                                    MJ227M Offline
                                    MJ227M Offline
                                    MJ227
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #41

                                    @Steiny Keep us posted on this thread on how your Reta reconstitutes. Also, post any pics after its reconstituted so we can see any differences from what I've posted.

                                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • RandyR Randy

                                      @Steiny No. If it clouds toss it.

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Steiny
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #42

                                      @Randy Understood—thank you for the response. I’ll share any findings I come across in this thread.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • MJ227M MJ227

                                        @Steiny Keep us posted on this thread on how your Reta reconstitutes. Also, post any pics after its reconstituted so we can see any differences from what I've posted.

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Steiny
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #43

                                        @MJ227 Will do. I emailed them directly after seeing your concerns—naturally, right after placing a large order (I got great timing). Hopefully, you already burned through all the cloudy peptides on your end lol, but with my luck, I may have ordered the cloudy 5 pack edition. Their response is below, and I’ll keep you posted. Hoping it has been resolved.

                                        Flawless Compounds [email protected]
                                        11:17 AM (50 minutes ago)
                                        to me

                                        Scott,

                                        Hi there! Cloudy peptides are almost always a case of poor reconstitution solution or bad methods (such as putting BAC in the refrigerator). I don’t believe we’re seeing anymore of these reports than any other time. We stand behind our products and the extensive testing that we perform. Thanks!

                                        MJ227M L 2 Replies Last reply
                                        1
                                        • S Steiny

                                          @MJ227 Will do. I emailed them directly after seeing your concerns—naturally, right after placing a large order (I got great timing). Hopefully, you already burned through all the cloudy peptides on your end lol, but with my luck, I may have ordered the cloudy 5 pack edition. Their response is below, and I’ll keep you posted. Hoping it has been resolved.

                                          Flawless Compounds [email protected]
                                          11:17 AM (50 minutes ago)
                                          to me

                                          Scott,

                                          Hi there! Cloudy peptides are almost always a case of poor reconstitution solution or bad methods (such as putting BAC in the refrigerator). I don’t believe we’re seeing anymore of these reports than any other time. We stand behind our products and the extensive testing that we perform. Thanks!

                                          MJ227M Offline
                                          MJ227M Offline
                                          MJ227
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #44

                                          @Steiny The "Cloudy 5-Pack Edition" 😂 definitely made me laugh. Sounds like some limited collector's release that nobody asked for.
                                          I ended up throwing mine away after they ghosted me. Thankfully I stocked up during the 4th of July sales from a few different vendors, so I have plenty from other sources. I actually like comparing vendors and reconstituting different batches just to see if there's any difference in my testing. I've definitely noticed some reta seems to perform better than others.
                                          The explanation they gave you is almost word-for-word what they sent me about why mine was cloudy. I have several bottles of BAC water that are all stored in a dark, room-temperature area, and I've never had this issue with products from other vendors.
                                          I'm going to keep one bottle of BAC water in the fridge and reconstitute another vial from a different vendor just for comparison. Hopefully it doesn't end up giving birth to the same alien lifeform that Flawless' batch did. 😂
                                          Hopefully your kit comes out crystal clear and you don't have to deal with any of this nonsense.

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups