Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Vendor Reviews & Orders
  3. My Recent Southern Aminos Order Makes Them Fall From Grace
Prize
Three Pens + Filters & Cartridges
Ends in
11962 entries · 4897 participants
Enter →

My Recent Southern Aminos Order Makes Them Fall From Grace

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vendor Reviews & Orders
southern-aminosreviewqualitymots-c
52 Posts 21 Posters 2.3k Views 2 Watching
My Recent Southern Aminos Order Makes Them Fall From Grace
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D denti

    @mexpep said:

    @eddiemejia

    9a4949be-545b-4982-9cf7-4cdb1a43e50b-image.jpeg

    I thought I was seeing double because I had the exact same experience as you, eddiemejia. My Reta went cloudy after reconstitution and then gelled. What really caught my attention is that your vial has the exact same batch number as mine.

    The interesting part in my case is that I have three vials from that same batch. One vial went cloudy and gelled, while the other two reconstituted just fine. So it clearly wasn’t something that happened consistently across every vial in the batch.

    I reported it to Southern Aminos as well. Unfortunately, their first response was pretty accusatory and immediately seemed to put the blame on me. I followed up and eventually got someone with much better customer service skills, and they gave me store credit for the vial.

    Still, the experience pushed me away from making future purchases from them. I’ve since moved on to Crush and Studz. I think Southern may have simply gotten too big too fast. I believe their intentions started out good, but if they don’t get their operations, logistics, and customer service under control, that will probably end up being their downfall.

    Honestly the more I read about them and after my own experience, f these guys. Accusatory and put blame on a customer. Why deal with that nonsense? You and the original poster both have cloudy Reta and they still want to blame both of you guys.

    @randy Honestly these guys should be blacklisted here. They just have terrible customer service. It's a shame if they continue to get purchases from users on this site when there are so many better vendors out there to use and are responsive here.

    Mydogdaryl423M Offline
    Mydogdaryl423M Offline
    Mydogdaryl423
    wrote last edited by
    #27

    @denti said:

    @mexpep said:

    @eddiemejia

    9a4949be-545b-4982-9cf7-4cdb1a43e50b-image.jpeg

    I thought I was seeing double because I had the exact same experience as you, eddiemejia. My Reta went cloudy after reconstitution and then gelled. What really caught my attention is that your vial has the exact same batch number as mine.

    The interesting part in my case is that I have three vials from that same batch. One vial went cloudy and gelled, while the other two reconstituted just fine. So it clearly wasn’t something that happened consistently across every vial in the batch.

    I reported it to Southern Aminos as well. Unfortunately, their first response was pretty accusatory and immediately seemed to put the blame on me. I followed up and eventually got someone with much better customer service skills, and they gave me store credit for the vial.

    Still, the experience pushed me away from making future purchases from them. I’ve since moved on to Crush and Studz. I think Southern may have simply gotten too big too fast. I believe their intentions started out good, but if they don’t get their operations, logistics, and customer service under control, that will probably end up being their downfall.

    Honestly the more I read about them and after my own experience, f these guys. Accusatory and put blame on a customer. Why deal with that nonsense? You and the original poster both have cloudy Reta and they still want to blame both of you guys.

    @randy Honestly these guys should be blacklisted here. They just have terrible customer service. It's a shame if they continue to get purchases from users on this site when there are so many better vendors out there to use and are responsive here.

    That shouldn't be on them. Thats why we have a community. Plenty of information is being provided here to inform people's decisions.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      SouthernAminos
      wrote last edited by
      #28

      We want to publicly address the recent concerns regarding certain MOTS-C labels, batch identification, COA matching, and reports involving reconstitution.

      First, regarding the MOTS-C labeling issue: we are aware that certain previously shipped vials contained labeling information that created confusion when customers attempted to match their vial to the corresponding testing documentation. We understand why that would raise concerns. Customers should be able to clearly identify the batch they received and connect it to the appropriate COA and testing documentation.

      We have reviewed the issue internally and have corrected the affected labeling on our current inventory. Newly shipped product is using the corrected labeling.

      Unfortunately, once an order has already shipped, we cannot physically correct the label on that vial. For customers who received an affected MOTS-C vial and are uncomfortable with the labeling discrepancy, we have offered the option to return the affected product so that it can be replaced with one containing the corrected label.

      We are also working to make the relationship between the vial batch information and the corresponding laboratory documentation as clear as possible. If a customer has a question about a specific vial, we encourage them to contact us with the batch information shown on the vial so that our team can provide the appropriate documentation and clarification.

      We also want to separately address concerns involving reconstitution.

      Southern Aminos supplies products strictly for laboratory and research use, and our policies regarding reconstituted products are disclosed prior to purchase. We do not automatically refund or replace a product solely because an issue is reported after reconstitution.

      The reason for this policy is that once a vial has been opened and reconstituted, there are a number of variables outside of our control, including the material used for reconstitution, storage conditions, handling, temperature exposure, technique, and the condition of the materials being used.

      A change in appearance after reconstitution therefore does not, by itself, establish that there was a problem with the original product.

      That does not mean we dismiss legitimate concerns. When a customer reports something unusual, we review the available information, including the batch involved, applicable laboratory testing, photographs when available, and other relevant details. Where there is evidence of an issue involving the original product, we want to identify it and address it appropriately.

      What we cannot do is automatically conclude that every post-reconstitution issue originated with the product when we cannot verify or control the conditions under which the vial was handled.

      We recognize that trust depends on transparency, particularly when it comes to batch identification and laboratory testing. The labeling issue should have been clearer, and we have corrected it going forward.

      For anyone who received an affected MOTS-C vial and would like clarification regarding the correct batch documentation, or would prefer to return the affected vial for a corrected replacement, please contact our customer service team directly.

      We appreciate customers bringing legitimate concerns to our attention. Our goal is not to avoid questions, but to provide accurate information, correct issues when they occur, and continue improving the way we present batch and testing information to customers.

      — Southern Aminos

      recon issues.png

      label.png

      D M BeeKindB 3 Replies Last reply
      -2
      • S SouthernAminos

        We want to publicly address the recent concerns regarding certain MOTS-C labels, batch identification, COA matching, and reports involving reconstitution.

        First, regarding the MOTS-C labeling issue: we are aware that certain previously shipped vials contained labeling information that created confusion when customers attempted to match their vial to the corresponding testing documentation. We understand why that would raise concerns. Customers should be able to clearly identify the batch they received and connect it to the appropriate COA and testing documentation.

        We have reviewed the issue internally and have corrected the affected labeling on our current inventory. Newly shipped product is using the corrected labeling.

        Unfortunately, once an order has already shipped, we cannot physically correct the label on that vial. For customers who received an affected MOTS-C vial and are uncomfortable with the labeling discrepancy, we have offered the option to return the affected product so that it can be replaced with one containing the corrected label.

        We are also working to make the relationship between the vial batch information and the corresponding laboratory documentation as clear as possible. If a customer has a question about a specific vial, we encourage them to contact us with the batch information shown on the vial so that our team can provide the appropriate documentation and clarification.

        We also want to separately address concerns involving reconstitution.

        Southern Aminos supplies products strictly for laboratory and research use, and our policies regarding reconstituted products are disclosed prior to purchase. We do not automatically refund or replace a product solely because an issue is reported after reconstitution.

        The reason for this policy is that once a vial has been opened and reconstituted, there are a number of variables outside of our control, including the material used for reconstitution, storage conditions, handling, temperature exposure, technique, and the condition of the materials being used.

        A change in appearance after reconstitution therefore does not, by itself, establish that there was a problem with the original product.

        That does not mean we dismiss legitimate concerns. When a customer reports something unusual, we review the available information, including the batch involved, applicable laboratory testing, photographs when available, and other relevant details. Where there is evidence of an issue involving the original product, we want to identify it and address it appropriately.

        What we cannot do is automatically conclude that every post-reconstitution issue originated with the product when we cannot verify or control the conditions under which the vial was handled.

        We recognize that trust depends on transparency, particularly when it comes to batch identification and laboratory testing. The labeling issue should have been clearer, and we have corrected it going forward.

        For anyone who received an affected MOTS-C vial and would like clarification regarding the correct batch documentation, or would prefer to return the affected vial for a corrected replacement, please contact our customer service team directly.

        We appreciate customers bringing legitimate concerns to our attention. Our goal is not to avoid questions, but to provide accurate information, correct issues when they occur, and continue improving the way we present batch and testing information to customers.

        — Southern Aminos

        recon issues.png

        label.png

        D Online
        D Online
        denti
        wrote last edited by denti
        #29

        @SouthernAminos At the end of the day after all is said and done, you offer TERRIBLE customer service and no one should shop with you.

        The only positive reviews you have are when no one has an issue with their order. But as soon as someone does, that's when you guys fail your customers. Other vendors here actually do work with the customer, aren't accusatory or place blame on the customer, and work with the customer when there is an issue. There are plenty of good vendors to shop with. You have time and again shown you are not one of them.

        1 Reply Last reply
        6
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          jaralewilliams
          wrote last edited by
          #30

          @southernaminos Hi, I’m a customer of your company and have really enjoyed the products I’ve purchased from you. I’ve also been following some of your posts and information here in the forum. I noticed that your company is located fairly close to me, and I’d be interested in exploring whether you have any employment opportunities available.

          I have a background in electrical and construction work, as well as experience running my own business. If you’re currently hiring or could use an extra set of hands, I’d appreciate knowing who I could contact or what email I could send my resume to. Thanks!

          1 Reply Last reply
          -5
          • Mydogdaryl423M Offline
            Mydogdaryl423M Offline
            Mydogdaryl423
            wrote last edited by Mydogdaryl423
            #31

            @southernaminos I am a customer of yours. I have had no issue with the products I have purchased and agree with what you said regarding reconstitution issues.

            You missed an opportunity though. Even your response lacks customer service tact. Using words like legitimate and automatic. Insinuating that peoples concerns are not genuine. If you are going to respond, take your lumps say you will do better and then do better. Most of the negative issues people have reported are in the customer service interactions once an issue arises. That is what I would like to see addressed.

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Mydogdaryl423M Mydogdaryl423

              @southernaminos I am a customer of yours. I have had no issue with the products I have purchased and agree with what you said regarding reconstitution issues.

              You missed an opportunity though. Even your response lacks customer service tact. Using words like legitimate and automatic. Insinuating that peoples concerns are not genuine. If you are going to respond, take your lumps say you will do better and then do better. Most of the negative issues people have reported are in the customer service interactions once an issue arises. That is what I would like to see addressed.

              D Online
              D Online
              denti
              wrote last edited by
              #32

              @Mydogdaryl423 said:

              @southernaminos I am a customer of yours. I have had no issue with the products I have purchased and agree with what you said regarding reconstitution issues.

              You missed an opportunity though. Even your response lacks customer service tact. Using words like legitimate and automatic. Insinuating that peoples concerns are not genuine. If you are going to respond, take your lumps say you will do better and then do better. Most of the negative issues people have reported are in the customer service interactions once an issue arises. That is what I would like to see addressed.

              You may agree with their general statement regarding reconstituting, but you have more than one customer now posting pictures of cloudy Reta, using HOSPIRA Bac water, and reconstituting other vials of the same or different peptides with the same Bac water that come out fine. Southern doesn't lyophilize their own peptides, they just slap their label on China purchased peptides, so they can't guarantee their entire batch is good or consistent.

              Mydogdaryl423M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D denti

                @Mydogdaryl423 said:

                @southernaminos I am a customer of yours. I have had no issue with the products I have purchased and agree with what you said regarding reconstitution issues.

                You missed an opportunity though. Even your response lacks customer service tact. Using words like legitimate and automatic. Insinuating that peoples concerns are not genuine. If you are going to respond, take your lumps say you will do better and then do better. Most of the negative issues people have reported are in the customer service interactions once an issue arises. That is what I would like to see addressed.

                You may agree with their general statement regarding reconstituting, but you have more than one customer now posting pictures of cloudy Reta, using HOSPIRA Bac water, and reconstituting other vials of the same or different peptides with the same Bac water that come out fine. Southern doesn't lyophilize their own peptides, they just slap their label on China purchased peptides, so they can't guarantee their entire batch is good or consistent.

                Mydogdaryl423M Offline
                Mydogdaryl423M Offline
                Mydogdaryl423
                wrote last edited by
                #33

                @denti said:

                @Mydogdaryl423 said:

                @southernaminos I am a customer of yours. I have had no issue with the products I have purchased and agree with what you said regarding reconstitution issues.

                You missed an opportunity though. Even your response lacks customer service tact. Using words like legitimate and automatic. Insinuating that peoples concerns are not genuine. If you are going to respond, take your lumps say you will do better and then do better. Most of the negative issues people have reported are in the customer service interactions once an issue arises. That is what I would like to see addressed.

                You may agree with their general statement regarding reconstituting, but you have more than one customer now posting pictures of cloudy Reta, using HOSPIRA Bac water, and reconstituting other vials of the same or different peptides with the same Bac water that come out fine. Southern doesn't lyophilize their own peptides, they just slap their label on China purchased peptides, so they can't guarantee their entire batch is good or consistent.

                Some are legitimate recon issues and yours may be. We also have people that dont know how to recon and after using toilet water want refunds.This is an issue that all companies deal with.

                We have seen companies that respond to the criticism well and others that implode here trying to defend themselves. I would like to see these issues handled better than what has been reported.

                I really appreciate this communities ability to hold companies to a standard and push forward expectations on things like customer service and testing. Hopefully SA will take the criticism and make improvements.

                S D 2 Replies Last reply
                1
                • Mydogdaryl423M Mydogdaryl423

                  @denti said:

                  @Mydogdaryl423 said:

                  @southernaminos I am a customer of yours. I have had no issue with the products I have purchased and agree with what you said regarding reconstitution issues.

                  You missed an opportunity though. Even your response lacks customer service tact. Using words like legitimate and automatic. Insinuating that peoples concerns are not genuine. If you are going to respond, take your lumps say you will do better and then do better. Most of the negative issues people have reported are in the customer service interactions once an issue arises. That is what I would like to see addressed.

                  You may agree with their general statement regarding reconstituting, but you have more than one customer now posting pictures of cloudy Reta, using HOSPIRA Bac water, and reconstituting other vials of the same or different peptides with the same Bac water that come out fine. Southern doesn't lyophilize their own peptides, they just slap their label on China purchased peptides, so they can't guarantee their entire batch is good or consistent.

                  Some are legitimate recon issues and yours may be. We also have people that dont know how to recon and after using toilet water want refunds.This is an issue that all companies deal with.

                  We have seen companies that respond to the criticism well and others that implode here trying to defend themselves. I would like to see these issues handled better than what has been reported.

                  I really appreciate this communities ability to hold companies to a standard and push forward expectations on things like customer service and testing. Hopefully SA will take the criticism and make improvements.

                  S Online
                  S Online
                  Stevepep
                  wrote last edited by
                  #34

                  @Mydogdaryl423 the good news is there are plenty of good companies who stand behind their products, test the right way at a real lab and don’t play games. When we buy from the ones who don’t we just hurt ourselves. The standards become less meaningful

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • Mydogdaryl423M Mydogdaryl423

                    @denti said:

                    @Mydogdaryl423 said:

                    @southernaminos I am a customer of yours. I have had no issue with the products I have purchased and agree with what you said regarding reconstitution issues.

                    You missed an opportunity though. Even your response lacks customer service tact. Using words like legitimate and automatic. Insinuating that peoples concerns are not genuine. If you are going to respond, take your lumps say you will do better and then do better. Most of the negative issues people have reported are in the customer service interactions once an issue arises. That is what I would like to see addressed.

                    You may agree with their general statement regarding reconstituting, but you have more than one customer now posting pictures of cloudy Reta, using HOSPIRA Bac water, and reconstituting other vials of the same or different peptides with the same Bac water that come out fine. Southern doesn't lyophilize their own peptides, they just slap their label on China purchased peptides, so they can't guarantee their entire batch is good or consistent.

                    Some are legitimate recon issues and yours may be. We also have people that dont know how to recon and after using toilet water want refunds.This is an issue that all companies deal with.

                    We have seen companies that respond to the criticism well and others that implode here trying to defend themselves. I would like to see these issues handled better than what has been reported.

                    I really appreciate this communities ability to hold companies to a standard and push forward expectations on things like customer service and testing. Hopefully SA will take the criticism and make improvements.

                    D Online
                    D Online
                    denti
                    wrote last edited by
                    #35

                    @Mydogdaryl423 said:

                    @denti said:

                    @Mydogdaryl423 said:

                    @southernaminos I am a customer of yours. I have had no issue with the products I have purchased and agree with what you said regarding reconstitution issues.

                    You missed an opportunity though. Even your response lacks customer service tact. Using words like legitimate and automatic. Insinuating that peoples concerns are not genuine. If you are going to respond, take your lumps say you will do better and then do better. Most of the negative issues people have reported are in the customer service interactions once an issue arises. That is what I would like to see addressed.

                    You may agree with their general statement regarding reconstituting, but you have more than one customer now posting pictures of cloudy Reta, using HOSPIRA Bac water, and reconstituting other vials of the same or different peptides with the same Bac water that come out fine. Southern doesn't lyophilize their own peptides, they just slap their label on China purchased peptides, so they can't guarantee their entire batch is good or consistent.

                    Some are legitimate recon issues and yours may be. We also have people that dont know how to recon and after using toilet water want refunds.This is an issue that all companies deal with.

                    We have seen companies that respond to the criticism well and others that implode here trying to defend themselves. I would like to see these issues handled better than what has been reported.

                    I really appreciate this communities ability to hold companies to a standard and push forward expectations on things like customer service and testing. Hopefully SA will take the criticism and make improvements.

                    You are right. There are people using toilet water to recon and having issues. Those customers need to be educated on why their peptide became cloudy or gelled. But when you have two customers reach out to Southern, both submitting pictures of using Hospira, and also that they reconned others fine, and Southerns response is to blame the customer and come on here and try to defend themselves with a stupid general statement and not actually take accountability and stand behind what they sell, then they are a trash company and should not be listed as a vendor on this site. I imagine many people do not come and read the forums here and just see them under the price index or what not, and blindly purchase from Southern, without knowing that Southern will not be providing customer service if they do have an issue. If they aren't listed here, or banned, at least the users coming here, have a less chance of supporting a terrible company like Southern Aminos.

                    Mydogdaryl423M 1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • S Stevepep

                      @Mydogdaryl423 the good news is there are plenty of good companies who stand behind their products, test the right way at a real lab and don’t play games. When we buy from the ones who don’t we just hurt ourselves. The standards become less meaningful

                      D Online
                      D Online
                      denti
                      wrote last edited by denti
                      #36

                      @Stevepep said:

                      @Mydogdaryl423 the good news is there are plenty of good companies who stand behind their products, test the right way at a real lab and don’t play games. When we buy from the ones who don’t we just hurt ourselves. The standards become less meaningful

                      Exactly. Let's support the companies who stand behind their product, actually provide good customer service. Let's reward them than awful resellers like Southern Aminos.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D denti

                        @Mydogdaryl423 said:

                        @denti said:

                        @Mydogdaryl423 said:

                        @southernaminos I am a customer of yours. I have had no issue with the products I have purchased and agree with what you said regarding reconstitution issues.

                        You missed an opportunity though. Even your response lacks customer service tact. Using words like legitimate and automatic. Insinuating that peoples concerns are not genuine. If you are going to respond, take your lumps say you will do better and then do better. Most of the negative issues people have reported are in the customer service interactions once an issue arises. That is what I would like to see addressed.

                        You may agree with their general statement regarding reconstituting, but you have more than one customer now posting pictures of cloudy Reta, using HOSPIRA Bac water, and reconstituting other vials of the same or different peptides with the same Bac water that come out fine. Southern doesn't lyophilize their own peptides, they just slap their label on China purchased peptides, so they can't guarantee their entire batch is good or consistent.

                        Some are legitimate recon issues and yours may be. We also have people that dont know how to recon and after using toilet water want refunds.This is an issue that all companies deal with.

                        We have seen companies that respond to the criticism well and others that implode here trying to defend themselves. I would like to see these issues handled better than what has been reported.

                        I really appreciate this communities ability to hold companies to a standard and push forward expectations on things like customer service and testing. Hopefully SA will take the criticism and make improvements.

                        You are right. There are people using toilet water to recon and having issues. Those customers need to be educated on why their peptide became cloudy or gelled. But when you have two customers reach out to Southern, both submitting pictures of using Hospira, and also that they reconned others fine, and Southerns response is to blame the customer and come on here and try to defend themselves with a stupid general statement and not actually take accountability and stand behind what they sell, then they are a trash company and should not be listed as a vendor on this site. I imagine many people do not come and read the forums here and just see them under the price index or what not, and blindly purchase from Southern, without knowing that Southern will not be providing customer service if they do have an issue. If they aren't listed here, or banned, at least the users coming here, have a less chance of supporting a terrible company like Southern Aminos.

                        Mydogdaryl423M Offline
                        Mydogdaryl423M Offline
                        Mydogdaryl423
                        wrote last edited by
                        #37
                        This post is deleted!
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Online
                          E Online
                          Eleanor
                          wrote last edited by Eleanor
                          #38

                          Hey @nuncles , did you see the email SA just sent out? Don't think I can post as a link, but here it is:

                          Important Update Regarding Yellow Cap MOTS-C 40mg Batch Numbers
                          We want to provide a clear update regarding a labeling issue that was limited specifically to certain previously shipped Yellow Cap MOTS-C 40mg vials.

                          This issue was specific to the 40mg Yellow Cap MOTS-C product and did not affect other MOTS-C strengths.

                          The issue involved an incorrect batch number being printed on the vial label of certain Yellow Cap MOTS-C 40mg vials.

                          Important Clarification
                          The error was limited specifically to the batch number printed on certain Yellow Cap MOTS-C 40mg vial labels. This labeling error does not affect the integrity, identity, or quality of the product itself and does not alter or invalidate the applicable Certificate of Analysis (COA) or laboratory testing associated with the correct batch.
                          Because the incorrect batch number appeared on the vial label, customers attempting to compare the number printed on their Yellow Cap MOTS-C 40mg vial with the testing documentation could understandably have difficulty identifying the corresponding Certificate of Analysis.

                          We want to be very clear that the issue was with the batch number printed on the label, not with the contents of the vial, the product itself, or the laboratory testing.

                          The Label Was Corrected Immediately
                          As soon as the incorrect batch number was brought to our attention, Southern Aminos reviewed the issue and corrected the affected Yellow Cap MOTS-C 40mg labels for future shipments. Current inventory being shipped uses the corrected batch number on the label.
                          Unfortunately, once an order has already shipped, there is no practical way for us to physically correct the batch number printed on a vial that is already in a customer's possession.

                          The Certificate of Analysis Remains Valid
                          We want to emphasize that the incorrect batch number printed on certain Yellow Cap MOTS-C 40mg vial labels does not invalidate the applicable Certificate of Analysis.

                          The COA reflects the laboratory testing performed on the corresponding batch. The printing error on the vial label did not change the underlying laboratory test results, testing documentation, or the product associated with that batch.

                          Need Help Identifying the Correct Batch or COA?
                          If you received one of the affected Yellow Cap MOTS-C 40mg vials, our customer service team can assist you with identifying the correct batch number and the corresponding Certificate of Analysis.

                          Please provide your order number and the information printed on your vial when contacting us so that we can verify the appropriate batch documentation.

                          Prefer a Vial With the Corrected Batch Number?
                          Although the incorrect batch number on the label does not affect the integrity of the product or the applicable Certificate of Analysis, we understand that some customers may prefer to receive a vial displaying the corrected batch number.

                          If you received an affected Yellow Cap MOTS-C 40mg vial and would prefer a vial with the corrected batch number on the label, please file a claim directly through the Southern Aminos website.

                          Our team will review your claim and provide the appropriate instructions for returning the affected vial and receiving a replacement displaying the corrected batch number.

                          File a Claim at Southern Aminos
                          In Summary
                          ✓ The issue was limited specifically to certain Yellow Cap MOTS-C 40mg vials.
                          ✓ Other MOTS-C strengths were not affected by this labeling issue.
                          ✓ The error involved an incorrect batch number printed on the vial label.
                          ✓ The integrity, identity, and quality of the product are not affected.
                          ✓ The product itself was not altered by the incorrect printed batch number.
                          ✓ The applicable laboratory testing remains unchanged.
                          ✓ The corresponding Certificate of Analysis remains valid.
                          ✓ The Yellow Cap MOTS-C 40mg label was corrected for future shipments as soon as the issue was identified.
                          ✓ Customers who prefer a vial with the corrected label may file a claim through Southern Aminos.

                          Proud to be on a gubmint watch list

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S SouthernAminos

                            We want to publicly address the recent concerns regarding certain MOTS-C labels, batch identification, COA matching, and reports involving reconstitution.

                            First, regarding the MOTS-C labeling issue: we are aware that certain previously shipped vials contained labeling information that created confusion when customers attempted to match their vial to the corresponding testing documentation. We understand why that would raise concerns. Customers should be able to clearly identify the batch they received and connect it to the appropriate COA and testing documentation.

                            We have reviewed the issue internally and have corrected the affected labeling on our current inventory. Newly shipped product is using the corrected labeling.

                            Unfortunately, once an order has already shipped, we cannot physically correct the label on that vial. For customers who received an affected MOTS-C vial and are uncomfortable with the labeling discrepancy, we have offered the option to return the affected product so that it can be replaced with one containing the corrected label.

                            We are also working to make the relationship between the vial batch information and the corresponding laboratory documentation as clear as possible. If a customer has a question about a specific vial, we encourage them to contact us with the batch information shown on the vial so that our team can provide the appropriate documentation and clarification.

                            We also want to separately address concerns involving reconstitution.

                            Southern Aminos supplies products strictly for laboratory and research use, and our policies regarding reconstituted products are disclosed prior to purchase. We do not automatically refund or replace a product solely because an issue is reported after reconstitution.

                            The reason for this policy is that once a vial has been opened and reconstituted, there are a number of variables outside of our control, including the material used for reconstitution, storage conditions, handling, temperature exposure, technique, and the condition of the materials being used.

                            A change in appearance after reconstitution therefore does not, by itself, establish that there was a problem with the original product.

                            That does not mean we dismiss legitimate concerns. When a customer reports something unusual, we review the available information, including the batch involved, applicable laboratory testing, photographs when available, and other relevant details. Where there is evidence of an issue involving the original product, we want to identify it and address it appropriately.

                            What we cannot do is automatically conclude that every post-reconstitution issue originated with the product when we cannot verify or control the conditions under which the vial was handled.

                            We recognize that trust depends on transparency, particularly when it comes to batch identification and laboratory testing. The labeling issue should have been clearer, and we have corrected it going forward.

                            For anyone who received an affected MOTS-C vial and would like clarification regarding the correct batch documentation, or would prefer to return the affected vial for a corrected replacement, please contact our customer service team directly.

                            We appreciate customers bringing legitimate concerns to our attention. Our goal is not to avoid questions, but to provide accurate information, correct issues when they occur, and continue improving the way we present batch and testing information to customers.

                            — Southern Aminos

                            recon issues.png

                            label.png

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            mindyswartz1
                            wrote last edited by
                            #39

                            @SouthernAminos I used to be a customer of yours. I in fact recommended you for people needing single vials for their testing. Research still depends on usable compounds after reconstitution and your response is a complete cop out. Stand behind your product, troubleshoot your batch issues. This market is way too saturated for a company that ships out junk.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            6
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Nuncles
                              wrote last edited by
                              #40

                              @eleanor Thanks. I hadn't see it. I was out of pocket this weekend and it was in my Clutter email folder. I'm just catching up on this thread. I was planning to email Southern to let them know about the discrepancy and see how they responded. They beat me to the punch. I will be contacting them regarding the vials I received.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • S SouthernAminos

                                We want to publicly address the recent concerns regarding certain MOTS-C labels, batch identification, COA matching, and reports involving reconstitution.

                                First, regarding the MOTS-C labeling issue: we are aware that certain previously shipped vials contained labeling information that created confusion when customers attempted to match their vial to the corresponding testing documentation. We understand why that would raise concerns. Customers should be able to clearly identify the batch they received and connect it to the appropriate COA and testing documentation.

                                We have reviewed the issue internally and have corrected the affected labeling on our current inventory. Newly shipped product is using the corrected labeling.

                                Unfortunately, once an order has already shipped, we cannot physically correct the label on that vial. For customers who received an affected MOTS-C vial and are uncomfortable with the labeling discrepancy, we have offered the option to return the affected product so that it can be replaced with one containing the corrected label.

                                We are also working to make the relationship between the vial batch information and the corresponding laboratory documentation as clear as possible. If a customer has a question about a specific vial, we encourage them to contact us with the batch information shown on the vial so that our team can provide the appropriate documentation and clarification.

                                We also want to separately address concerns involving reconstitution.

                                Southern Aminos supplies products strictly for laboratory and research use, and our policies regarding reconstituted products are disclosed prior to purchase. We do not automatically refund or replace a product solely because an issue is reported after reconstitution.

                                The reason for this policy is that once a vial has been opened and reconstituted, there are a number of variables outside of our control, including the material used for reconstitution, storage conditions, handling, temperature exposure, technique, and the condition of the materials being used.

                                A change in appearance after reconstitution therefore does not, by itself, establish that there was a problem with the original product.

                                That does not mean we dismiss legitimate concerns. When a customer reports something unusual, we review the available information, including the batch involved, applicable laboratory testing, photographs when available, and other relevant details. Where there is evidence of an issue involving the original product, we want to identify it and address it appropriately.

                                What we cannot do is automatically conclude that every post-reconstitution issue originated with the product when we cannot verify or control the conditions under which the vial was handled.

                                We recognize that trust depends on transparency, particularly when it comes to batch identification and laboratory testing. The labeling issue should have been clearer, and we have corrected it going forward.

                                For anyone who received an affected MOTS-C vial and would like clarification regarding the correct batch documentation, or would prefer to return the affected vial for a corrected replacement, please contact our customer service team directly.

                                We appreciate customers bringing legitimate concerns to our attention. Our goal is not to avoid questions, but to provide accurate information, correct issues when they occur, and continue improving the way we present batch and testing information to customers.

                                — Southern Aminos

                                recon issues.png

                                label.png

                                BeeKindB Online
                                BeeKindB Online
                                BeeKind
                                wrote last edited by
                                #41

                                @SouthernAminos I like how you didn't address blocking and banning customers who come to you with concerns. That's where you really shine here.

                                Just someone with a fridge full of research and a browser history that would concern my doctor.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • atlas01A Online
                                  atlas01A Online
                                  atlas01
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #42

                                  I sense a red banner in your future @southernaminos

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • pep_researcherP Offline
                                    pep_researcherP Offline
                                    pep_researcher
                                    wrote last edited by pep_researcher
                                    #43

                                    @southernaminos These are not isolated issues. I bought from you only ONCE NINE MONTHS ago, and even that was a poor experience. You sent me vials whose COA was nowhere traceable on your website or in your own COA library. I reached out to you and you sent me some other COA with DIFFERENT content and purity numbers saying this is the same batch when it was NOT.

                                    I only bought two vials to test out a new vendor, you failed the test, and so I never bought from you again and so didn't try to escalate (which was good because you clearly don't do a good job in handling escalations).

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • E Online
                                      E Online
                                      Eleanor
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #44

                                      WTH! A 2nd Update?:

                                      SOUTHERN AMINOS
                                      Important Product Label Notice
                                      MOTS-C 40mg Yellow Cap
                                      Batch Number Label Correction
                                      This is a typographical error on the vial label only.
                                      The error does not affect the contents of the vial, product quality, laboratory testing, or the validity of the Certificate of Analysis.
                                      We recently identified that a small number of MOTS-C 40mg Yellow Cap vials were shipped with an incorrect batch number printed on the vial label.

                                      We want to be very clear: this was a typographical labeling error involving the batch number only. It was not a manufacturing issue, product integrity issue, testing issue, or Certificate of Analysis issue.

                                      The affected vial can still be identified and verified using the QR code on the vial and the Yellow Cap color. The applicable Certificate of Analysis remains valid for the product.

                                      Important Facts
                                      ✓ The issue is limited to a typographical error in the batch number printed on the vial label.
                                      ✓ The error does not affect the product's quality or integrity.
                                      ✓ The Certificate of Analysis remains valid.
                                      ✓ The vial can still be verified using its QR code and Yellow Cap color.
                                      ✓ This does not affect every MOTS-C 40mg Yellow Cap vial.
                                      ✓ Only a small number of vials shipped prior to the correction were affected.
                                      Replacement Options
                                      Although this labeling error does not affect the product itself, we understand that some customers may prefer to have a vial displaying the corrected batch information.

                                      Unused & Unopened Vials
                                      If your affected vial is unused and unopened, you may request a replacement vial with the corrected label.
                                      Opened or Used Vials
                                      If the vial has already been opened or used, we cannot provide a replacement vial. However, upon request, we can provide you with a corrected replacement label that can be applied to your existing vial.
                                      Again, this is a labeling typo only.
                                      It does not change the identity, quality, testing, or Certificate of Analysis associated with the product.
                                      The labeling issue was corrected as soon as it was identified, and only a limited number of vials shipped before that correction were affected.

                                      We apologize for any confusion this typographical error may have caused and appreciate your understanding.

                                      If you have an affected vial and would like to request either an eligible replacement or a corrected label, please contact Southern Aminos Customer Service.

                                      Southern Aminos
                                      Products are sold strictly for research purposes only.
                                      Please refer to our website for applicable policies and product information.

                                      Proud to be on a gubmint watch list

                                      pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Nuncles
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #45

                                        @eleanor Unless I'm missing something,the second update is not factually correct. The QR code on my vials go to the ILS COA that matches the batch number on the vial, which does not match the yellow cap.

                                        E 1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • N Nuncles

                                          @eleanor Unless I'm missing something,the second update is not factually correct. The QR code on my vials go to the ILS COA that matches the batch number on the vial, which does not match the yellow cap.

                                          E Online
                                          E Online
                                          Eleanor
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #46

                                          @Nuncles said:

                                          @eleanor Unless I'm missing something,the second update is not factually correct. The QR code on my vials go to the ILS COA that matches the batch number on the vial, which does not match the yellow cap.

                                          I don't know, Nuncles. It's a plethora of BS. This 'typo' mess? Hmm.

                                          Proud to be on a gubmint watch list

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups