Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Testing question
Prize
Peptide Critic Case and Pens
Ends in
280 entries · 174 participants
Enter →

Testing question

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
3 Posts 2 Posters 78 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Source Research
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Hey everyone, Source Research here. We've been reading along for a while and figured it's time to say hi.

    We're a small research-use-only supplier, and testing is the part we care about most. We only work with suppliers who test extensively on their end. When a lot comes in, we keep the supplier's lot number on it and send it to an independent third-party lab for our own testing, so you can trace any vial from the supplier's batch to our COA. Every lot gets HPLC for identity and purity and its own certificate of analysis. We also publish the lots that fail. We recently rejected a GHK-Cu batch that came back over the limit for heavy metals, and it's posted right next to the ones that passed: https://sourceresearch.io/testing/

    Honestly, we think this should be the industry standard: supplier testing plus independent retesting, tied to one traceable lot number. It feels like what the market's asking for. But we'd rather hear it from you than assume. Is that level of traceability something you look for? Which tests matter most to you when you're deciding whether to trust a lot?
    Glad to be here, and thanks for having us.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dontfyourlifeD Offline
      dontfyourlifeD Offline
      dontfyourlife
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      I like the website and the push for transparency. Just a quick question on your BPC-157 10 mg

      There are 2 COA's listed.
      For Lot xzgt3gk- Peptide is pure (99.78%), but each vial only contains 8.26 mg of active BPC-157. Also no verified safety data for heavy metals or sterility.

      For Lot sr-bpc-260316-001- Peptide meets the dosage claim (10.34 mg), purity and passed all checks for sterility/endotoxins

      So which lot are you actively shipping?

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • dontfyourlifeD dontfyourlife

        I like the website and the push for transparency. Just a quick question on your BPC-157 10 mg

        There are 2 COA's listed.
        For Lot xzgt3gk- Peptide is pure (99.78%), but each vial only contains 8.26 mg of active BPC-157. Also no verified safety data for heavy metals or sterility.

        For Lot sr-bpc-260316-001- Peptide meets the dosage claim (10.34 mg), purity and passed all checks for sterility/endotoxins

        So which lot are you actively shipping?

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Source Research
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @dontfyourlife

        Thanks so much, and great question. That's exactly the kind of checking we hope people will do.

        The lot we're shipping right now is sr-bpc-260316-001, which our independent lab tested at 10.34 mg.

        xzgt3gk is our supplier's lot number, and the 8.26 mg result is from their COA, not ours. We share the source COA for the compounds we're selling now because we want to be transparent, and we know there's a gap between their numbers and ours. That's something we're fixing.

        Going forward, every lot will be tied to the lot our supplier sells us and tests. If our COA and theirs don't match, we won't sell it that lot, and our supplier has committed to the same. Our supplier is ClearBatch, and we're proud to work with them.

        If you'd like, DM me and I'll send you some free BPC-157 for your own testing, as thanks for such a thoughtful question. Questions like this make us better.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

        Register Login
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups