Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community

Peptide Critic Community

  1. Randy the Rats Research Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. We tested peptide degradation so people can stop guessing
Prize
Enter to Win a Gansulin Auto Injector Pen, with Carts a Pepboys Vial Storage Case
Ends in
7154 entries · 1000 participants
Enter →

We tested peptide degradation so people can stop guessing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
lab-teststoragemazdutideglp2-tmots-c
42 Posts 25 Posters 717 Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Juan Doe
    wrote last edited by
    #22

    Thank you for the great info. Alleviates many concerns.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      kj4otu
      wrote last edited by kj4otu
      #23

      @randy Not that I'm questioning you, but in the interest of openness I'm curious if your actual test result docs state that this was reconstituted vials tested. The reason I ask is there are gymbros on dudetube saying the same things, but the test results (in one particular example from Janoshik) say nothing about whether the test was on reconstituted peptide or just lyophilized. Again not saying you are being dishonest, but the other guy's test results were definitely ambiguous.

      B RandyR 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • K kj4otu

        @randy Not that I'm questioning you, but in the interest of openness I'm curious if your actual test result docs state that this was reconstituted vials tested. The reason I ask is there are gymbros on dudetube saying the same things, but the test results (in one particular example from Janoshik) say nothing about whether the test was on reconstituted peptide or just lyophilized. Again not saying you are being dishonest, but the other guy's test results were definitely ambiguous.

        B Offline
        B Offline
        brandenscheidecker
        wrote last edited by
        #24

        @kj4otu If your read this post he clearly spell it out "one diluent type"

        B K 2 Replies Last reply
        1
        • B brandenscheidecker

          @kj4otu If your read this post he clearly spell it out "one diluent type"

          B Offline
          B Offline
          brandenscheidecker
          wrote last edited by
          #25

          We partnered with Analytical Formulations Inc. (AFI) to evaluate the stability of three peptides after reconstitution:

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K kj4otu

            @randy Not that I'm questioning you, but in the interest of openness I'm curious if your actual test result docs state that this was reconstituted vials tested. The reason I ask is there are gymbros on dudetube saying the same things, but the test results (in one particular example from Janoshik) say nothing about whether the test was on reconstituted peptide or just lyophilized. Again not saying you are being dishonest, but the other guy's test results were definitely ambiguous.

            RandyR Online
            RandyR Online
            Randy
            wrote last edited by Randy
            #26

            @kj4otu "All samples in this study were prepared using bacteriostatic water with 0.9% benzyl alcohol."

            It's sprinkled all throughout the post.

            If we didn't reconstitute them, the tests would be worthless. There would also be no degradation of any kind.

            "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

            K 1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • D Offline
              D Offline
              daring
              wrote last edited by
              #27

              I imagine an even faster decline with the daily in/out of the fridge...

              RandyR M 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • B bangkokiscool

                I'm curious to see the sharp drop after a few months for Tirz even in the fridge. How does the pharma pen stay valid for their expiry dates?

                F Offline
                F Offline
                flyhigh
                wrote last edited by
                #28
                This post is deleted!
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B bangkokiscool

                  I'm curious to see the sharp drop after a few months for Tirz even in the fridge. How does the pharma pen stay valid for their expiry dates?

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  flyhigh
                  wrote last edited by
                  #29

                  @bangkokiscool Pharmaceuticals pens and compounding have a lot of additives to stabalize. IVMedco compounded Tirzepatide for example is Tirz, Vitamin B12, Sodium Chloride, Sodium Dibasic Heptahydrate and Water plus HCL to balance ph if needed.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Steve
                    wrote last edited by
                    #30

                    Aaand this is why I love this site. Thanks for doing the leg work on this.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D daring

                      I imagine an even faster decline with the daily in/out of the fridge...

                      RandyR Online
                      RandyR Online
                      Randy
                      wrote last edited by
                      #31

                      @daring Not really — the fridge samples in the study sat the entire time at room temp and showed little drop by day 15 even. The brief temperature excursion from pulling a vial out, drawing a dose, and putting it back takes maybe 30–60 seconds and barely moves the needle on cumulative thermal exposure. If if you let it warm up to room temp before putting it back i thats only hours of time at room temp over the course of a cart, The bigger drivers are overall storage temperature and time.

                      "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • D daring

                        I imagine an even faster decline with the daily in/out of the fridge...

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        matthewwalsh
                        wrote last edited by
                        #32

                        @daring I was curious about the same thing so ran it through AI and here what was reported:

                        "One stability guide notes that if reconstituted MOTS‑c is kept at 4 °C continuously, it stays >95% pure for about 28 days; intermittent warm excursions accelerate loss, dropping to ~85% by 14 days and <70% by 28 days when repeatedly warmed to room temperature."

                        This correlates somewhat with what Jeff reported on his very awesome study (Thank You Jeff!) although his study reported more degradation at 31 days than sighted here.

                        Nonetheless, given enough correlation I think I can assume with a high degree of confidence based on both sources of info that yes I could expect MOTS C to degrade considerably more warming to room temperature for injection rather than continuously refrigerating.

                        I also asked AI about injecting sub peptide at 35 degrees F...

                        "For a typical subcutaneous peptide injection (like 0.25–0.5 mL in belly fat), having the solution very cold mainly increases local discomfort and the chance of a small lump or irritation, but it’s unlikely to cause deep or systemic damage by itself."

                        Based on all of this, I think I'll refrigerate of course, take my pen straight away and inject sub then put peptidecritic pen back into the frig. Not recommending this to anyone else but that's what I think I'll do for my rat. Of course it depends on lots of different variables not the least of which how long you expect your vial to be stored before being fully dispensed into your rat.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • RandyR Randy

                          @kj4otu "All samples in this study were prepared using bacteriostatic water with 0.9% benzyl alcohol."

                          It's sprinkled all throughout the post.

                          If we didn't reconstitute them, the tests would be worthless. There would also be no degradation of any kind.

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          kj4otu
                          wrote last edited by
                          #33

                          @Randy I get that you said it multiple times. I am asking about the actual coa document/lab results from the testing lab. I would like to see that posted and would like to see it state the actual test parameter. Like I said, I’m not trying to question your statement just asking for verification. Others posting these same comments in testing have also not shown the actual test results from the lab. Your stuff seems different/more legit so I assumed you would jump at the chance to show lab verification. No offense but I don't actually know you. Trust but verify you know. Again not trying to just make waves here.

                          RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B brandenscheidecker

                            @kj4otu If your read this post he clearly spell it out "one diluent type"

                            K Offline
                            K Offline
                            kj4otu
                            wrote last edited by
                            #34

                            @brandenscheidecker if you’ll read my post you see that I acknowledge what he SAYS but I am asking for the actual documents from the lab showing the test parameters. I’ve yet to see anyone claiming to do this test that shows the labs docs listing the test parameters as reconstituted. I would like to see it truly put to bed. Trust but verify man. I think that is the name of the game in this industry. At least if you’re smart.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • K kj4otu

                              @Randy I get that you said it multiple times. I am asking about the actual coa document/lab results from the testing lab. I would like to see that posted and would like to see it state the actual test parameter. Like I said, I’m not trying to question your statement just asking for verification. Others posting these same comments in testing have also not shown the actual test results from the lab. Your stuff seems different/more legit so I assumed you would jump at the chance to show lab verification. No offense but I don't actually know you. Trust but verify you know. Again not trying to just make waves here.

                              RandyR Online
                              RandyR Online
                              Randy
                              wrote last edited by
                              #35

                              @kj4otu Here's the Raw Data for each: Screenshot 2026-04-24 at 8.11.01 AM.png Screenshot 2026-04-24 at 8.11.16 AM.png Screenshot 2026-04-24 at 8.11.28 AM.png

                              "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Commander
                                wrote last edited by
                                #36

                                Those read like instruction on setting the clock on a Chinese VCR. Thank god there are smart people that can interpret them and share the easy versions...

                                Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • RandyR Online
                                  RandyR Online
                                  Randy
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #37

                                  @commander yeah they're useless unless you are the lab tech.

                                  @kj4otu asked for the raw results after not reading the original post saying what the dilutant was. Believe the data or don't. ...or better yet spend 5k on tests and do it yourself 🙂

                                  "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                                  3
                                  • RandyR Randy

                                    @commander yeah they're useless unless you are the lab tech.

                                    @kj4otu asked for the raw results after not reading the original post saying what the dilutant was. Believe the data or don't. ...or better yet spend 5k on tests and do it yourself 🙂

                                    P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    PeptidePete
                                    wrote last edited by PeptidePete
                                    #38

                                    @Randy said in We tested peptide degradation so people can stop guessing:

                                    @kj4otu asked for the raw results after not reading the original post saying what the dilutant was. Believe the data or don't. ...or better yet spend 5k on tests and do it yourself 🙂

                                    Illustrative example of why we just can't have nice things anymore.

                                    "or better yet spend 5k on tests and do it yourself :)"

                                    I really appreciate all that you do Jeff! Thanks for the stability reports, tremendous value. AT NO COST TO ME 😀

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      ResearchCat
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #39

                                      @matthewwalsh I inject cold all the time; I don’t care. I don’t think there is any more discomfort than at room temperature, or, again, I don’t care. If that is a concern, do what I do for my bride’s rat(she has concierge service!) and draw the syringe, letting that get to room temperature while the vial is back in the fridge.

                                      Be wary using AI for this. It’s mostly scraping all the other web sites and posters, which are all either repeating one source(e.g. bac water goes bad after 28 days) or are aggregating made up stuff that isn’t verified.

                                      I am not saying it isn’t useful, but I am using AI for work and it’s just great when you ask it to summarize regulatory requirements for financial derivatives and it makes up answers when it can’t find what you’re looking for.

                                      M C 2 Replies Last reply
                                      1
                                      • R ResearchCat

                                        @matthewwalsh I inject cold all the time; I don’t care. I don’t think there is any more discomfort than at room temperature, or, again, I don’t care. If that is a concern, do what I do for my bride’s rat(she has concierge service!) and draw the syringe, letting that get to room temperature while the vial is back in the fridge.

                                        Be wary using AI for this. It’s mostly scraping all the other web sites and posters, which are all either repeating one source(e.g. bac water goes bad after 28 days) or are aggregating made up stuff that isn’t verified.

                                        I am not saying it isn’t useful, but I am using AI for work and it’s just great when you ask it to summarize regulatory requirements for financial derivatives and it makes up answers when it can’t find what you’re looking for.

                                        M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        matthewwalsh
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #40

                                        @ResearchCat Wise advice! Great to get your testimonial on injecting cold - way more helpful to hear real life applications than from a machine for sure. I so appreciate Jeff paying for and sharing real testing results that gives me great confidence in my approach.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          matthewwalsh
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #41

                                          And btw... I'm using peptidecritic v4 pen and would highly recommend that to anyone - bought more than one and love these peptide pens. Just so damn convenient (and not painful at all) over single injection syringe.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          5
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups