Nexaph CJC/Ipa Test Results - A Lot Lower Than Janoshik’s
-
@Commander mots is niche and a lower purity is usually accepted. It does degrade quicker in lio'd form than a glp.
Ive ordered a kit of reta from nexaph. Stay tuned.
@Randy said in Nexaph CJC/Ipa Test Results - A Lot Lower Than Janoshik’s:
@Commander mots is niche and a lower purity is usually accepted. It does degrade quicker in lio'd form than a glp.
Ive ordered a kit of reta from nexaph. Stay tuned.
Let me know if I can donate a little to the cause. I've been a huge fan of Nexaph thus far.
-
@Commander said in Nexaph CJC/Ipa Test Results - A Lot Lower Than Janoshik’s:
@Ctrain24
What is a Patreon?It's a monthly service that allows you to support someone with payment contributions as a community.
-
I’m far from an expert especially in this field but do work a bit with testing & measurement mainly in the electrical/electronicmechanical fields - the answer may not be as simple as you think - they both may be right or even both wrong.
Different equipment measuring different things in different ways may come up with different quantities especially if they are in different countries and work to different standards even assuming all else is equal.
In Aus we have our Australia Standards (AS) for pretty much everything as do most other countries and in most cases countries sort of work to ISO’s as well which as International Standards but ISO isn’t run by any country at all really and whether it is used in the cases here or it is a requirement to legally do the work they are doing I wouldn’t have a clue.
Pretty sure the screen shots of our AS15472 relate to it but there could also be others.
The big one is even if they were identical machines and identical operators if they aren’t calibrated/tested routinely they could still give different results.Then again I could just be talking shit
-
I’m far from an expert especially in this field but do work a bit with testing & measurement mainly in the electrical/electronicmechanical fields - the answer may not be as simple as you think - they both may be right or even both wrong.
Different equipment measuring different things in different ways may come up with different quantities especially if they are in different countries and work to different standards even assuming all else is equal.
In Aus we have our Australia Standards (AS) for pretty much everything as do most other countries and in most cases countries sort of work to ISO’s as well which as International Standards but ISO isn’t run by any country at all really and whether it is used in the cases here or it is a requirement to legally do the work they are doing I wouldn’t have a clue.
Pretty sure the screen shots of our AS15472 relate to it but there could also be others.
The big one is even if they were identical machines and identical operators if they aren’t calibrated/tested routinely they could still give different results.Then again I could just be talking shit
@STATIEEIGHT
Actually what you are saying is exactly what I was thinking.
Lets say a machine is calibrated a little wrong and always comes high (but by a consistent amount) maybe Janoshik, and another machine is calibrated wrong and always comes in a little low but by a consistent amount) maybe Janoshik. Then we could for the most part factor that in.
In a few weeks when my LN order comes in, I am sending one vial to Freedom and one to BT, I want to see how those two compare. -
@STATIEEIGHT
Actually what you are saying is exactly what I was thinking.
Lets say a machine is calibrated a little wrong and always comes high (but by a consistent amount) maybe Janoshik, and another machine is calibrated wrong and always comes in a little low but by a consistent amount) maybe Janoshik. Then we could for the most part factor that in.
In a few weeks when my LN order comes in, I am sending one vial to Freedom and one to BT, I want to see how those two compare.It’s not even that they’re calibrated wrong - they may be calibrated correctly but to a different standard which is where the ISO International standard comes in.
But as long as they are actually calibrated/tested to some sort of standard even if they are both reading different- they at least should be consistently different.
If not - well then it another kettle of fish - consistency between vials in batches or even kits, operators error etc etc.
My guess is that if you send 10 vials all from the same kit to 10 different testers you’ll get 10 different results- how different would be the interesting part.
-
@Randy if you need a few reta let me know. I have a kit of 🦞 coming in by Thurs. Jano M/p 34.97 99.941%, freedom 34.22 99.91- endo <0.05 eu/ml
