Discussion: Redacted COAs, a Failed Copyright Strike, and Victoria’s Retatrutide Warning: A Completely Unrelated Series of Events, Obviously
-
Discussion thread for the blog post on PeptideCritic.com.
Read the article: Redacted COAs, a Failed Copyright Strike, and Victoria’s Retatrutide Warning: A Completely Unrelated Series of Events, Obviously
Share your thoughts, ask questions, or continue the conversation below!
-
This read is freaking hilarious. You should publish a book titled "Chronicles of peptide vendors"
-
So, a word, if I may, on Research Use Only. We all know. Everyone does what they do.
The implication somewhere deep in there, not talking specifically about this vendor, but anyone who is shady about verification, is an attitude of “well, it’s okay if I accidentally sell you poison because it’s for research use only.” Which on the one hand, is something researchers have signed up for in a minimal way, and on the other hand, to your entire point, is why we need to be able to trust COA authenticity.
Jenny might not care, but if some fool starts getting people killed, he is going to have problems and the whole market is going to blow up.
Just my snarky .02.
Thanks for your work Jeff/Randy. Extra cheese for you.
-
Great article. Thank you again for all you do and providing this space for all of us to share research and help to have a safer community.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login