Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community

Peptide Critic Community

  1. Randy the Rats Research Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Looks like Nexaph is starting to test for metals, sterility, endo.
Monthly Contest

No contest currently running. Check back soon!

Looks like Nexaph is starting to test for metals, sterility, endo.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
23 Posts 11 Posters 2.2k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • SoySebastianS Offline
    SoySebastianS Offline
    SoySebastian
    wrote on last edited by SoySebastian
    #1

    Recently saw on their website that they're updating testing for Tirz. The recent batch of T30 has an updated COA for Purity & Heavy metals with Endo and Sterlity coming soon. I feel like this such a great move and will definitely sway more buyers. Hopefully it doesn't affect the price much.

    Screenshot 2026-07-05 at 9.47.52 AM.png

    pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
    13
    • SoySebastianS SoySebastian deleted this topic on
    • SoySebastianS SoySebastian restored this topic on
    • SoySebastianS Offline
      SoySebastianS Offline
      SoySebastian
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Per their telegram, products moving forward will have the additional testing. So I would assume products currently still in stock will just have the purity still.

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • WisGal64W Offline
        WisGal64W Offline
        WisGal64
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Love to see it!

        “Currently in a committed relationship with my plateau. Waiting for my receptor reset to file for divorce”

        1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • SoySebastianS SoySebastian

          Per their telegram, products moving forward will have the additional testing. So I would assume products currently still in stock will just have the purity still.

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Stevepep
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @SoySebastian Yes, and you can find the testing for those in stock on Telegram as well. Third party testing shows full panels. So now you will have the Nexaph tests and third party tests. I emailed them a while back about people not realizing all the batch testing that is done, and they said to make it easier for those who don't want to do any research, they were going to start including it in their own vendor testing.

          Nexaph is the Goat for 10 packs, EZ is the same for single vials

          1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • J Offline
            J Offline
            JtCjEfF
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Well, there goes any (real or imagined) benefit Crush had for me. TBH, I have still ordered more from Nexaph because of what I’m learning about their testing. Love to see this and hope it does not increase price.

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • C Offline
              C Offline
              Commander
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Amazing that you people still don’t get it -it doesn’t matter what they test for - You Must Test What You Receive.
              Anyone believing a vendor”s COA is an idiot.. yes that is everyone that posted in this thread…

              Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

              vpeptidesV atlas01A J 3 Replies Last reply
              -2
              • C Offline
                C Offline
                Commander
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                I have explained this MULTIPLE times.. but for the people who want to believe Elvis is still alive and that Aliens secretly control the world.
                A manufacture (Nexaph) send samples out that they send in or do “third party testing “ that they pay for is in control of those results. They pick what vials they send in… if you can’t figure out what that means, you are clearly too dumb and deserve what you get.
                And for those that are going to comment on the third larty trst results (that Nexaph pays for), well you are just as dumb.
                Yes they have been people smart enough ( and not cheap) that have sent in Nexaph’s products for completey independent testing (like me) and the test results have come back COMPLETELY different than the ones Nexaph has posted… i am not posting them again, stop being lazy and just accepting what sounds good to you so you can continue to be cheap and tell yourself everything is fine. If you can’t afford to send yourself stuff out for testing, you Shouldn’t be buying peptides. I can’t afford to race cars, so I don’t buy a piece of shit race car, race and loose and whine that it is unfair…

                Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                S pep_researcherP 2 Replies Last reply
                -4
                • C Commander

                  Amazing that you people still don’t get it -it doesn’t matter what they test for - You Must Test What You Receive.
                  Anyone believing a vendor”s COA is an idiot.. yes that is everyone that posted in this thread…

                  vpeptidesV Offline
                  vpeptidesV Offline
                  vpeptides
                  wrote on last edited by vpeptides
                  #8

                  @Commander

                  1. You are right.
                  2. It is not financially feasible if you only need 1 or 2 vials.
                  3. Even if you do it, it is not guaranteed that the untested vial from the same shipment has exactly the same content.
                  4. The test may fail in different aspects: identity, mass, contaminants, a little off or a lot. It all changes how bad the product really is.

                  Conclusion: it is not a categorical difference, it is about higher and lower probability of getting a better or worse material. The cost is also a factor, so we are talking about a risk level that people are willing to take, and that's their decision.

                  attentiion is all you need

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  6
                  • C Commander

                    Amazing that you people still don’t get it -it doesn’t matter what they test for - You Must Test What You Receive.
                    Anyone believing a vendor”s COA is an idiot.. yes that is everyone that posted in this thread…

                    atlas01A Online
                    atlas01A Online
                    atlas01
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @Commander Ad hominem is not conducive to effective dialogue... and it doesn't inspire confidence in people new to peptides (such as myself).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    6
                    • FalcF Offline
                      FalcF Offline
                      Falc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @Commander, for the record, Elvis is alive and well and lives in an Alien base under the White House!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • C Commander

                        Amazing that you people still don’t get it -it doesn’t matter what they test for - You Must Test What You Receive.
                        Anyone believing a vendor”s COA is an idiot.. yes that is everyone that posted in this thread…

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        JtCjEfF
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @Commander um…. YOU posted in this thread. 😁

                        Now kick yourself in the Jimmy.

                        I get what you’re saying, I do. I think if you would take a step back and realize you are both better off, and just “better” than the rest of us, it might ease your mind.

                        What your comments fail to recognize is your ability to do so. Some, I’ll use myself as the example, am not financially able to do what you suggest. Nor do I think it’s even logical to buy from a place like Nexaph at a premium then test again. Might as well buy the greyest cheapest you can find and go that route.

                        Nor do I have access to insurance to go about this the safest way possible and just spend the thousands through a Dr for FDA approved shit.

                        I worked my ass off to raise a family for over 3 decades, and now find myself unemployed and living off the nest egg I built without insurance, and quite honestly betrayed by the very industry that professes to keep us healthy. So I take it into my own hands. MY hands. Which means my decisions.

                        “Idiotic”? Maybe. Desperate not to die young as my genetics and long family history suggest, absolutely.

                        Your post, while I’m sure is well intended, is tone deaf and a narrow view. I’m happy you can do it the way you’re doing it. Well done sir.

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        9
                        • C Commander

                          I have explained this MULTIPLE times.. but for the people who want to believe Elvis is still alive and that Aliens secretly control the world.
                          A manufacture (Nexaph) send samples out that they send in or do “third party testing “ that they pay for is in control of those results. They pick what vials they send in… if you can’t figure out what that means, you are clearly too dumb and deserve what you get.
                          And for those that are going to comment on the third larty trst results (that Nexaph pays for), well you are just as dumb.
                          Yes they have been people smart enough ( and not cheap) that have sent in Nexaph’s products for completey independent testing (like me) and the test results have come back COMPLETELY different than the ones Nexaph has posted… i am not posting them again, stop being lazy and just accepting what sounds good to you so you can continue to be cheap and tell yourself everything is fine. If you can’t afford to send yourself stuff out for testing, you Shouldn’t be buying peptides. I can’t afford to race cars, so I don’t buy a piece of shit race car, race and loose and whine that it is unfair…

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Stevepep
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @Commander Thats fine, test everything. I do as well. I have yet to see a COA that differed in a dangerous way from the manufacturers I order from. Mainly Nexaph and EZ. The mass is off at most by a milligram. I know you had one vial from them where the weight was very different. But what will you do with that information? Does that mean all 10 had that weight variance? Mass is last on the things to worry about. Yes, you didn't get the quantity you paid for, but worst case, you took a lower dose. Honestly, I am not going to continue to test everything I get from Nexaph. It's a solution for a problem that doesn't exist. I have done enough to verify that what they say is valid. I will randomly test, but not throw my money away when it comes to them.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          4
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Stevepep
                            wrote on last edited by Stevepep
                            #13

                            @gym.rat Random testing is the best solution from a vendor like a Nexaph who is used by so many people IMO. What else does @commander want Nexaph to do? They internal test and pay for third party testing. I guess he sees the fact that they pay for it as some sort of scam on their part I see it as the opposite. But we all are responsible adults and can determine what is best. To continue to test every batch I receive from Nexaph IMO seems foolish at this point.

                            Snake PepskinS 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • S Stevepep

                              @gym.rat Random testing is the best solution from a vendor like a Nexaph who is used by so many people IMO. What else does @commander want Nexaph to do? They internal test and pay for third party testing. I guess he sees the fact that they pay for it as some sort of scam on their part I see it as the opposite. But we all are responsible adults and can determine what is best. To continue to test every batch I receive from Nexaph IMO seems foolish at this point.

                              Snake PepskinS Offline
                              Snake PepskinS Offline
                              Snake Pepskin
                              wrote on last edited by Snake Pepskin
                              #14

                              @Stevepep well said.

                              At this point you gotta trust somebody. I recently saw a COA from Freedom for Chinese BAC water, they tested content and purity, which both came in fine. They didn’t test ph, which is probably the easiest test and should be done for any dilutent. I’m assuming they weren’t asked to, but I feel they should have enough knowledge of this market to suggest it to the customer. The description was “White lyophilized powder” which tells me that they are not exactly paying as much attention to detail as I would expect.

                              “Knowledge is the ultimate power.
                              It’s not what you know that defines you, it’s that which you share, that defines you.”

                              N 1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • Snake PepskinS Snake Pepskin

                                @Stevepep well said.

                                At this point you gotta trust somebody. I recently saw a COA from Freedom for Chinese BAC water, they tested content and purity, which both came in fine. They didn’t test ph, which is probably the easiest test and should be done for any dilutent. I’m assuming they weren’t asked to, but I feel they should have enough knowledge of this market to suggest it to the customer. The description was “White lyophilized powder” which tells me that they are not exactly paying as much attention to detail as I would expect.

                                N Offline
                                N Offline
                                Nuncles
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                @Snake-Pepskin I know which "Unfiltered" Bac water you are referring to. That COA does not look right and I question it's validity.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Commander
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  I do trust some testing. But not from a manufacturer. I trust testing the most (not completely) from places like Puratec who buy from the same “manufacturers” on the grey market as everyone else - and them put their label on it and send it for testing. They are buying a limited number of kits, so the odds what they received is all from the same batch is greater. They cannot cherry pick what vials are good or not - because they have no idea and didn’t fill them. Just like you or I who bought 10 or 20 kits of the same product.
                                  Nexaph is a manufacturer- they cannot cherry pick cherry pick what vials to send for testing. And for the rest of you who just want to believe.. well I already said my piece about how smart you are. In fact, the Judge said it best in Caddy Shack, the World needs ditch diggers too…

                                  Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  -4
                                  • C Commander

                                    I have explained this MULTIPLE times.. but for the people who want to believe Elvis is still alive and that Aliens secretly control the world.
                                    A manufacture (Nexaph) send samples out that they send in or do “third party testing “ that they pay for is in control of those results. They pick what vials they send in… if you can’t figure out what that means, you are clearly too dumb and deserve what you get.
                                    And for those that are going to comment on the third larty trst results (that Nexaph pays for), well you are just as dumb.
                                    Yes they have been people smart enough ( and not cheap) that have sent in Nexaph’s products for completey independent testing (like me) and the test results have come back COMPLETELY different than the ones Nexaph has posted… i am not posting them again, stop being lazy and just accepting what sounds good to you so you can continue to be cheap and tell yourself everything is fine. If you can’t afford to send yourself stuff out for testing, you Shouldn’t be buying peptides. I can’t afford to race cars, so I don’t buy a piece of shit race car, race and loose and whine that it is unfair…

                                    pep_researcherP Offline
                                    pep_researcherP Offline
                                    pep_researcher
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @Commander True. By that rule people taking branded GLPs should send one pen from their monthly kit, I mean prescription, for independent testing, because not a long time ago Wegovy pens had cat hair found INSIDE the pens.

                                    Ozempic or Wegovy distribution chain was also compromised for a short while with fake pens making into the distribution.

                                    You can't trust anything! Absolutely true.

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J JtCjEfF

                                      @Commander um…. YOU posted in this thread. 😁

                                      Now kick yourself in the Jimmy.

                                      I get what you’re saying, I do. I think if you would take a step back and realize you are both better off, and just “better” than the rest of us, it might ease your mind.

                                      What your comments fail to recognize is your ability to do so. Some, I’ll use myself as the example, am not financially able to do what you suggest. Nor do I think it’s even logical to buy from a place like Nexaph at a premium then test again. Might as well buy the greyest cheapest you can find and go that route.

                                      Nor do I have access to insurance to go about this the safest way possible and just spend the thousands through a Dr for FDA approved shit.

                                      I worked my ass off to raise a family for over 3 decades, and now find myself unemployed and living off the nest egg I built without insurance, and quite honestly betrayed by the very industry that professes to keep us healthy. So I take it into my own hands. MY hands. Which means my decisions.

                                      “Idiotic”? Maybe. Desperate not to die young as my genetics and long family history suggest, absolutely.

                                      Your post, while I’m sure is well intended, is tone deaf and a narrow view. I’m happy you can do it the way you’re doing it. Well done sir.

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      Commander
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @JtCjEfF
                                      My post is saying exactly what it is…
                                      This has been discussed all over the place, STG, here, Meso, GLP-1, etc… but people want to make themselves feel better on why they justify idiotic stuff.
                                      At least when I do something stupid, and I do a lot, I say it as it is, I don’t try and justify it. The problem with putting stupid stuff out like this is that it misguides new people into thinking this testing is legitimate. You want to fool yourself, that is fine. But it isn’t right to confuse new people.
                                      It is simple - trusting a manufacturers COAs is stupid, plan and simple. It is simple logic.
                                      But in the end, I actually don’t care, my stuff is tested, I don’t have to justify to myself why I don’t need to send my stuff out for testing.
                                      Barn and others in the past have already proven that everything from grey market needs to be tested.
                                      I wonder how many of the people that ended up in the Hospital awhile back because they were sent the wrong thing were on forums “justifying” how they don’t need to test because they vendor tested it…I wonder if we ask them now if they would still say the same thing?
                                      This is not theory, this shit happened in the past, it will happen in the future.
                                      I received an order from the now gone LN Peptides, IPA, MT2 and HCG. The MT2 and the HCG had the same exact cap color. What is the odds that they might have made a mistake when putting the labels on the kit? Now lets think about that for second… they have COAs for the HCG showing it is good. Great, I don’t need to test it because I have a COA with the right picture and my HCG is good, YA!!! Now I recon it with 3ml of great Hospira BAC water. Dam, I need to take my first dose. So I take my 10iu, I should be fine. Oh wait, it actually wasn’t HCG, it was MT2, now mixed way to strong. I take my 10iu, with in minutes I am throwing up and my head is on fire - dam I hope I don’t have a heart condition- now I am calling 911 hoping I don’t die…
                                      People have ended up in the hospital because they were sent the wrong thing, it is not urban legend, it is not a story tale to scare kids into being good, it has happened.
                                      So for anyone new here reading this. You better do your research and you will find out how many times things aren’t what the Vendors COA says it is..
                                      Oh wait, didn’t Barn just have the same color cap vials of Reta they sent out test 5mg, 5mg, and 30mg… and what was that, less than 3 weeks ago?
                                      Some Single vial vendors test as we do, and yes I buy from them, but they must meet a bunch of my criteria before I do..
                                      But by all means ignore the fact that people have ended up in the hospital in the past because they were sent the wrong thing. But they wouldn’t have been in the hospital if they tested what they went sent now would they

                                      Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      -1
                                      • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                                        @Commander True. By that rule people taking branded GLPs should send one pen from their monthly kit, I mean prescription, for independent testing, because not a long time ago Wegovy pens had cat hair found INSIDE the pens.

                                        Ozempic or Wegovy distribution chain was also compromised for a short while with fake pens making into the distribution.

                                        You can't trust anything! Absolutely true.

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        Commander
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @pep_researcher
                                        Completely different and not the same, but again believe what you want.
                                        Was it something different in the pen? Did they send MT2 instead of Wagovy? Or maybe it was CJC and not Wagovy.. ya that didn’t happen. And your right, we should definitely trust a Chinese factory selling stuff illegally to us over a licensed phama company.
                                        You are again misrepresenting what I said. I also didn’t say test your tap water every day because of the flint Michigan mess..

                                        Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        -1
                                        • SoySebastianS SoySebastian

                                          Recently saw on their website that they're updating testing for Tirz. The recent batch of T30 has an updated COA for Purity & Heavy metals with Endo and Sterlity coming soon. I feel like this such a great move and will definitely sway more buyers. Hopefully it doesn't affect the price much.

                                          Screenshot 2026-07-05 at 9.47.52 AM.png

                                          pep_researcherP Offline
                                          pep_researcherP Offline
                                          pep_researcher
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @SoySebastian I'm beating myself for falling for all the fear mongering around RUO shutdown 4 months ago. Now I'm sitting on a 2 yr worth Reta inventory much of which only has purity, net content, and endotoxins COAs AND I paid more. 😭

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups