Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Supplies, Mixing & Storage
  3. Does filtering work? Yep, lab tested....
Prize
Peptide Critic Case and Pens
Ends in
277 entries · 171 participants
Enter →

Does filtering work? Yep, lab tested....

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Supplies, Mixing & Storage
72 Posts 27 Posters 10.4k Views 1 Watching
Does filtering work? Yep, lab tested.... Does filtering work? Yep, lab tested....
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • vpepsV vpeps

    @Stevepep Thank you for running AI for us, but the way you presumably constructed your question predisposed the positive answer. If you ask: Will using 0.1 µm syringe filter be significantly more harmful for filtering small peptides solutions comparing to 0.22 µm filter made with the same low-binding hydrophilic membrane like PES?, you may get a different answer.

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    A Former User
    wrote last edited by
    #29

    @vpeptides Side note. I hate AI. It creates stupid people ignorant of their own ignorance. (No I'm not saying Stevepep is stupid. Just making a general statement about what I see in the real world work environment, etc). I get this 10 times a day as an IT director from users entering our response to a helpdesk ticket into AI. "Fine then....fix it yourself!" lol!

    vpepsV 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ? A Former User

      @vpeptides Side note. I hate AI. It creates stupid people ignorant of their own ignorance. (No I'm not saying Stevepep is stupid. Just making a general statement about what I see in the real world work environment, etc). I get this 10 times a day as an IT director from users entering our response to a helpdesk ticket into AI. "Fine then....fix it yourself!" lol!

      vpepsV Offline
      vpepsV Offline
      vpeps
      wrote last edited by vpeps
      #30

      @jamiegallien AI is OK as long as you clearly realize it is NOT A PERSON, it's a tool that works as a fishing rod, so it all depends how and where you cast it, what bait you use, how deep you will let your line go, how fast you will pull, etc. You may get a different fish, or no fish at all.

      attentiion is all you need

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • M mary

        50count@$57.29 +tax,shpg

        https://www.novatech-usa.com/GSI-SF-PES-1013-S

        D Offline
        D Offline
        denti
        wrote last edited by
        #31

        @mary said:

        50count@$57.29 +tax,shpg

        https://www.novatech-usa.com/GSI-SF-PES-1013-S

        I placed an order from them but unfortunately they don’t actually have them in stock. They expect to get it in September. I asked them to cancel my order.

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • vpepsV vpeps

          @Stevepep Thank you for running AI for us, but the way you presumably constructed your question predisposed the positive answer. If you ask: Will using 0.1 µm syringe filter be significantly more harmful for filtering small peptides solutions comparing to 0.22 µm filter made with the same low-binding hydrophilic membrane like PES?, you may get a different answer.

          S Online
          S Online
          Stevepep
          wrote last edited by
          #32

          @vpeptides I am no expert in this area and have no care either way what the correct answer is but they both essentially say the very same thing.

          tertiary-structured proteins, highly fragile or complex peptide assemblies could theoretically be disrupted

          Bottom line people can use whatever filter they want. I have no horse in this race. AI on peptides sucks because much of the generated information is old and wrong and compiled by people like you and I who know enough to be dangerous.

          vpepsV ? 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • S Stevepep

            @vpeptides I am no expert in this area and have no care either way what the correct answer is but they both essentially say the very same thing.

            tertiary-structured proteins, highly fragile or complex peptide assemblies could theoretically be disrupted

            Bottom line people can use whatever filter they want. I have no horse in this race. AI on peptides sucks because much of the generated information is old and wrong and compiled by people like you and I who know enough to be dangerous.

            vpepsV Offline
            vpepsV Offline
            vpeps
            wrote last edited by
            #33

            @Stevepep I agree. Still, the length of even a long 191 AA polypeptide (HGH) if unrolled in a line is about 67 nm (but it's usually rolled into 5 nm 3D structure), other peptides are much smaller. So even 0.1um (i.e. 100 nm) filter is theoretically fine if it is a low-binding material. Just do it slowly. But those Mycoplasma contaminants also don't scare me too much, it's a minor threat. So, I guess I don't care much either.

            attentiion is all you need

            S 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • vpepsV vpeps

              @Stevepep I agree. Still, the length of even a long 191 AA polypeptide (HGH) if unrolled in a line is about 67 nm (but it's usually rolled into 5 nm 3D structure), other peptides are much smaller. So even 0.1um (i.e. 100 nm) filter is theoretically fine if it is a low-binding material. Just do it slowly. But those Mycoplasma contaminants also don't scare me too much, it's a minor threat. So, I guess I don't care much either.

              S Online
              S Online
              Stevepep
              wrote last edited by
              #34

              @vpeptides This one I defer on. I just have no clue; it's why I looked it up. My guess is you are correct: go slow and don't create pressure. Like I say thats just a guess

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Rodney_RatR Offline
                Rodney_RatR Offline
                Rodney_Rat
                wrote last edited by
                #35
                This post is deleted!
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Stevepep

                  @vpeptides I am no expert in this area and have no care either way what the correct answer is but they both essentially say the very same thing.

                  tertiary-structured proteins, highly fragile or complex peptide assemblies could theoretically be disrupted

                  Bottom line people can use whatever filter they want. I have no horse in this race. AI on peptides sucks because much of the generated information is old and wrong and compiled by people like you and I who know enough to be dangerous.

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  A Former User
                  wrote last edited by
                  #36

                  @Stevepep It's a non issue anyway just from a numbers standpoint. A 0.1 micron filter pore can pass compounds with a molecular weight rating of about 1 million Daltons. The larger peptides we use such as GLP's are ~6000 Daltons. Anything bigger than that is no longer a peptide but is a protein (insulin 5800Da, HGH~22000Da, etc). TRT and such are even smaller.

                  Stripping the peptide from the solution would happen with nylon or cellulosa based filters (these are PES and chemically modified specifically to allow peptides to pass), extreme pressure (why I tell people to take up to 1 min to filter 3ml - not necessary but a safe number), or if the reconstituted solution is clotted (cloudy and I won't use anyway). Also running a bit of bac only through the filter before introducing the peptide "wets" the filter so you aren't using peptide solution to do that, which would waste a small amount.

                  Hope this helps.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  4
                  • Snake PepskinS Online
                    Snake PepskinS Online
                    Snake Pepskin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #37

                    Good info. Thanks.

                    “Knowledge is the ultimate power.
                    It’s not what you know that defines you, it’s that which you share that defines you.”

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Offline
                      D Offline
                      dmc
                      wrote last edited by
                      #38

                      You guys are much more informed than I am on this topic. Curious - if there were mycoplasma (or any other biological contamination) in these lyophilized powders that were destroyed during the lyophilization process, would the remains be considered endotoxins? Is there any filter that will get rid of those? Without damaging the peptides, of course?

                      F 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D denti

                        @mary said:

                        50count@$57.29 +tax,shpg

                        https://www.novatech-usa.com/GSI-SF-PES-1013-S

                        I placed an order from them but unfortunately they don’t actually have them in stock. They expect to get it in September. I asked them to cancel my order.

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        mary
                        wrote last edited by
                        #39

                        denti
                        Thanks, they did not indicate on my order that it would take that long to receive them.
                        All of the other vendors I checked actually disclosed that they were resellers for this item. Also, one of the other vendors said it was only a week delay on the order, so maybe it doesn't take two months.
                        Novatech had the best prices, however, so I may wait it out.

                        If you find someone who stocks them, please let us know.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Offline
                          R Offline
                          remwar
                          wrote last edited by
                          #40

                          I have some reta to would that destroy it with the filter being so tiny? If no, would it remove endo? #oldguy

                          F 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Snake PepskinS Online
                            Snake PepskinS Online
                            Snake Pepskin
                            wrote last edited by Snake Pepskin
                            #41

                            I just placed an order here, not sure how long it will take yet. I’ll keep you updated. But they have free shipping. I’ve ordered from them before, not medical related and they shipped quickly.

                            https://www.zoro.com/globe-scientific-syringe-filter-13-mm-dia-10-ml-pk50-sf-pes-1013-s/i/G903673742/

                            “Knowledge is the ultimate power.
                            It’s not what you know that defines you, it’s that which you share that defines you.”

                            T 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • vpepsV vpeps

                              I guess 0.22um filter would work as well.

                              B Offline
                              B Offline
                              Blueeyedme
                              wrote last edited by
                              #42

                              @vpeptides - correct. 0.22 µm (220 nanometers) is the standard pore size used for laboratory sterile filtration. Anything else is overkill from a sterility standpoint.

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • L Offline
                                L Offline
                                LexLen
                                wrote last edited by
                                #43

                                So we know it "passed" the sterility at 0.10. Now we would need to see if it would pass sterility at 0.22. If so, then we would need to test each size for purity to see if the pep made it through?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • ? A Former User

                                  @damic Amazon. The part number is visible in the Vanguard test results.

                                  pep_researcherP Online
                                  pep_researcherP Online
                                  pep_researcher
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #44

                                  @OldGuy said:

                                  @damic Amazon. The part number is visible in the Vanguard test results.

                                  Which exactly on Amazon. There are many with same printing on backside of filter pack.

                                  Mind sharing the link?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B Blueeyedme

                                    @vpeptides - correct. 0.22 µm (220 nanometers) is the standard pore size used for laboratory sterile filtration. Anything else is overkill from a sterility standpoint.

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    mary
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #45

                                    @Blueeyedme
                                    Maybe not if the rat's bbb is not intact.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J JtCjEfF

                                      Ill also add that the concern of mycoplasma does not seem to be of high concern, since it has a very hard time surviving the lyophilization AND rehydration process, not even adding in the 0.9% alcohol we are all using in our BAC water.

                                      e6a43c17-9254-4ba0-881d-d90e1862237c-image.jpeg
                                      ea07121e-6998-4a9b-9c58-0e30491d74b8-image.jpeg

                                      K Offline
                                      K Offline
                                      karinperry
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #46

                                      @JtCjEfF Great article!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • D dmc

                                        You guys are much more informed than I am on this topic. Curious - if there were mycoplasma (or any other biological contamination) in these lyophilized powders that were destroyed during the lyophilization process, would the remains be considered endotoxins? Is there any filter that will get rid of those? Without damaging the peptides, of course?

                                        F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        flyhigh
                                        wrote last edited by flyhigh
                                        #47

                                        @diannemccann Yes specifically these are designed for sterility and endotoxins and are the best way for a single vial peptide purchaser to deal with S&E if all they have is IPN on a peptide. Cytiva (PALL) 4908-N Acrodisc Syringe Filters Optimized for Scale Up, Posidyne membrane, sterile, 0.2 µm 25mm. .22 is the standard not .1

                                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F flyhigh

                                          @diannemccann Yes specifically these are designed for sterility and endotoxins and are the best way for a single vial peptide purchaser to deal with S&E if all they have is IPN on a peptide. Cytiva (PALL) 4908-N Acrodisc Syringe Filters Optimized for Scale Up, Posidyne membrane, sterile, 0.2 µm 25mm. .22 is the standard not .1

                                          S Online
                                          S Online
                                          Stevepep
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #48

                                          @flyhigh endotoxins are cell walls these filters are not going to be successful filtering out tiny molecules like that. Bacteria and other contaminants yes but endotoxins are too small

                                          F 1 Reply Last reply
                                          2

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups