EZP-3P vs NXP-3P

[MyB]

Same batch, different results posted
With the sale it’s $20 more for a kit that already comes labeled from EZ, then got thrown for a loop when I looked at the COA’s.

EZP https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/155945-ezp_3p_24mg_transparent_green_or_green_autumn_gold_QAY8CRPMIMEL

NXP https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/156371-3p_24mg_transparent_green_or_green_autumn_gold_XY4TC5ZKXZW7

[Stevepep]

@MyB I don/t follow. The green cap was individually tested at 99.654, and then they tested multiple vials, and the combined results were 99.835. It's not unusual to see a variation of .2pct between samples.

Unless I am missing something

[atlas01]

Just go with Nexaph, label it yourself

[MyB]

The 2nd party test server also came up with 25mg
https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/165646-nxp_3p_24mg_trans_green_or_green_autumn_gold_PXI7KNBC2LCN

[Stevepep]

@MyB Yes, it's the variance in the fills. They do so much more testing than anyone else, and there is variance between all vials, unfortunately. I always look at all the testing and use the average. This won't change the dosage by much in terms of IU. I would use 26 in this case. You are looking at a difference of about 43 IU compared to 46IU for a 4mg dose. The thing is, you get so many COA's on Nexaph, and they mostly overfill. The truth is, at least you know we have no clue about the variances from almost every other vendor, even if they test 3 samples and most test one.

[MyB]

I found the original coa on TG, and it ranged from 25-29. I’m a little pissy they cherry picked the average and posted it instead of the actual one posted on TG with all three m&p shown.

[Randy]

@MyB variance on fills is the one boogy man we have yet to really face in the industry.