Nexaph testing
-
It appears the previous batch of MOTS-C - MOT1007162026-20 was also in the 97% and change range on the Janoshik testing. Their most recent batch of MOTS-C MOT1008212026-21 is coming in mid 98% to low 99%.
-
It appears the previous batch of MOTS-C - MOT1007162026-20 was also in the 97% and change range on the Janoshik testing. Their most recent batch of MOTS-C MOT1008212026-21 is coming in mid 98% to low 99%.
@PeptideEd the previous batch they gave out discounts on I passed . I have this batch it hits
-
@Nuncles yes from pure lab peptides which was recommended from peptidedosages so I figured it was safe. I ended up with flu like systems I couldn’t get my head off the pillow for 2 days and an ISR that turned into a wound. I contacted them and they said it’s for research only. The good news is @randy called them out for their fake COA’s and I found this community.
If someone is buying a product for research only with a Freedom COA all of the information has been given to you in this group that it can’t be trusted. You have no one to blame but yourself if you end up having an adverse reaction. IMO you want to control what you can we can’t control the manufacturing but we can verify a COA and make sure it’s from a trustworthy lab if not get it tested ourselves. Otherwise you have lost control and you are taking a very unnecessary risk which could have severe consequences.
That’s enough for me to hear. I am trashing all of my Freedom tested peptides. Just not worth the risk.
-
@denti Depending on the quantities, is it worth sending samples out for your own testing?
-
-
-
@Stevepep Yeah. The testing lab space could use some more players. Jano and Vanguard are about the only options besides those you just named.
Lobster has posted some interesting Jano test results in his TG group. I don't know how to verify this as true, but he has posted COAs of his products from multiple labs and from Janoshik where he compares the results from Jano that were from samples that he sent and samples that Group Buy Testing Groups sent in of the same products from the same batch where. Jano's results were consistently lower for products with the Lobster name as the source versus private groups that didn't name him as the source. Supposedly the same batches of products getting different results depending on who sent them in. Makes you question some of the politics behind the labs. Who can you really trust?
-
@Stevepep Yeah. The testing lab space could use some more players. Jano and Vanguard are about the only options besides those you just named.
Lobster has posted some interesting Jano test results in his TG group. I don't know how to verify this as true, but he has posted COAs of his products from multiple labs and from Janoshik where he compares the results from Jano that were from samples that he sent and samples that Group Buy Testing Groups sent in of the same products from the same batch where. Jano's results were consistently lower for products with the Lobster name as the source versus private groups that didn't name him as the source. Supposedly the same batches of products getting different results depending on who sent them in. Makes you question some of the politics behind the labs. Who can you really trust?
-
-
-
Nexaph latest KPV is also sub 99. What's going on I wonder?
-
Nexaph latest KPV is also sub 99. What's going on I wonder?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login