Question(s) for y'all - EZ Peptides vial QR / batch code mismatch
-
First off, if this needs to be moved into the Discussion thread, sorry, wasn't sure.
Hi everyone. Been lurking here for a little while and really like the no BS discussions. Researching peps shouldn't be a game of spot-the-con. I've got an interesting (to me) situation. I'll try to be concise.The order: 3 vials TB-500 Frag 17-23 10mg (not TB4) from EZ Peptides for a very specific, short-term project (hence the singles). I received them last night. 1 vial from the EZP-TBH06172026-06 batch and 2 vials from EZP-TBH05142026-05 batch. Call them -05 and -06
The problem:
- Scan the QR on either vial marked with the -05 batch number and it takes you to the Janoshik report for the -06 batch.
- Scan the QR on the -06 vial and you get the EZ COA report which has the link to Janoshik.
- Go to the product page and that batch isn't even listed. There's a clear gap in the COA list. -04 -06 -07
- Search their COA portal and it says the COA hasn't been released.
- Go to their COA by Product page and the COA is listed under TB-500 but the links points to the -06 COA.
- I went further but I'll stop
The question(s): How hard would you call them out on this? Refund? Replace? Would/could you trust any of their labels? If you're a TB-500 researcher, you'll remember that the -05 batch had a mean quantity of 7.52mg or -24.8%.
I'm less concerned about being shorted than I am about the obvious "mistake" they made. I've never had to deal with a vendor that has a good reputation but does something lousy. I've got deep-dive research that points to a concerted effort to scrub the -05 COA (all versions) from the public eye, but that's tin-foil hat territory. lol
I can share it if anyone wants.Thanks for reading and for any advice. And if someone has the EZP version of that batch's COA, I'd love to have a copy. I have the Nexaph and Ameona versions but, maybe if I collect the set I'll win a free bottle of Uncle Wang's Toilet Water
-
First off, if this needs to be moved into the Discussion thread, sorry, wasn't sure.
Hi everyone. Been lurking here for a little while and really like the no BS discussions. Researching peps shouldn't be a game of spot-the-con. I've got an interesting (to me) situation. I'll try to be concise.The order: 3 vials TB-500 Frag 17-23 10mg (not TB4) from EZ Peptides for a very specific, short-term project (hence the singles). I received them last night. 1 vial from the EZP-TBH06172026-06 batch and 2 vials from EZP-TBH05142026-05 batch. Call them -05 and -06
The problem:
- Scan the QR on either vial marked with the -05 batch number and it takes you to the Janoshik report for the -06 batch.
- Scan the QR on the -06 vial and you get the EZ COA report which has the link to Janoshik.
- Go to the product page and that batch isn't even listed. There's a clear gap in the COA list. -04 -06 -07
- Search their COA portal and it says the COA hasn't been released.
- Go to their COA by Product page and the COA is listed under TB-500 but the links points to the -06 COA.
- I went further but I'll stop
The question(s): How hard would you call them out on this? Refund? Replace? Would/could you trust any of their labels? If you're a TB-500 researcher, you'll remember that the -05 batch had a mean quantity of 7.52mg or -24.8%.
I'm less concerned about being shorted than I am about the obvious "mistake" they made. I've never had to deal with a vendor that has a good reputation but does something lousy. I've got deep-dive research that points to a concerted effort to scrub the -05 COA (all versions) from the public eye, but that's tin-foil hat territory. lol
I can share it if anyone wants.Thanks for reading and for any advice. And if someone has the EZP version of that batch's COA, I'd love to have a copy. I have the Nexaph and Ameona versions but, maybe if I collect the set I'll win a free bottle of Uncle Wang's Toilet Water
First off, if this needs to be moved into the Discussion thread, sorry, wasn't sure.
Hi everyone. Been lurking here for a little while and really like the no BS discussions. Researching peps shouldn't be a game of spot-the-con. I've got an interesting (to me) situation. I'll try to be concise.The order: 3 vials TB-500 Frag 17-23 10mg (not TB4) from EZ Peptides for a very specific, short-term project (hence the singles). I received them last night. 1 vial from the EZP-TBH06172026-06 batch and 2 vials from EZP-TBH05142026-05 batch. Call them -05 and -06
The problem:
- Scan the QR on either vial marked with the -05 batch number and it takes you to the Janoshik report for the -06 batch.
- Scan the QR on the -06 vial and you get the EZ COA report which has the link to Janoshik.
- Go to the product page and that batch isn't even listed. There's a clear gap in the COA list. -04 -06 -07
- Search their COA portal and it says the COA hasn't been released.
- Go to their COA by Product page and the COA is listed under TB-500 but the links points to the -06 COA.
- I went further but I'll stop
The question(s): How hard would you call them out on this? Refund? Replace? Would/could you trust any of their labels? If you're a TB-500 researcher, you'll remember that the -05 batch had a mean quantity of 7.52mg or -24.8%.
I'm less concerned about being shorted than I am about the obvious "mistake" they made. I've never had to deal with a vendor that has a good reputation but does something lousy. I've got deep-dive research that points to a concerted effort to scrub the -05 COA (all versions) from the public eye, but that's tin-foil hat territory. lol
I can share it if anyone wants.Thanks for reading and for any advice. And if someone has the EZP version of that batch's COA, I'd love to have a copy. I have the Nexaph and Ameona versions but, maybe if I collect the set I'll win a free bottle of Uncle Wang's Toilet Water
Did you contact them?
-
First off, if this needs to be moved into the Discussion thread, sorry, wasn't sure.
Hi everyone. Been lurking here for a little while and really like the no BS discussions. Researching peps shouldn't be a game of spot-the-con. I've got an interesting (to me) situation. I'll try to be concise.The order: 3 vials TB-500 Frag 17-23 10mg (not TB4) from EZ Peptides for a very specific, short-term project (hence the singles). I received them last night. 1 vial from the EZP-TBH06172026-06 batch and 2 vials from EZP-TBH05142026-05 batch. Call them -05 and -06
The problem:
- Scan the QR on either vial marked with the -05 batch number and it takes you to the Janoshik report for the -06 batch.
- Scan the QR on the -06 vial and you get the EZ COA report which has the link to Janoshik.
- Go to the product page and that batch isn't even listed. There's a clear gap in the COA list. -04 -06 -07
- Search their COA portal and it says the COA hasn't been released.
- Go to their COA by Product page and the COA is listed under TB-500 but the links points to the -06 COA.
- I went further but I'll stop
The question(s): How hard would you call them out on this? Refund? Replace? Would/could you trust any of their labels? If you're a TB-500 researcher, you'll remember that the -05 batch had a mean quantity of 7.52mg or -24.8%.
I'm less concerned about being shorted than I am about the obvious "mistake" they made. I've never had to deal with a vendor that has a good reputation but does something lousy. I've got deep-dive research that points to a concerted effort to scrub the -05 COA (all versions) from the public eye, but that's tin-foil hat territory. lol
I can share it if anyone wants.Thanks for reading and for any advice. And if someone has the EZP version of that batch's COA, I'd love to have a copy. I have the Nexaph and Ameona versions but, maybe if I collect the set I'll win a free bottle of Uncle Wang's Toilet Water
Did you contact them?
-
@mydogdaryl423 @randy Yep. I reached out to them tonight and got an answer in just over an hour with an offer of refund/reship/store credit. But more importantly, they took full ownership for the whole shipment being wrong, not just the two -05 vials. I should have gotten all -07.
So yeah, I'm impressed, happy with the resolution, and a bit chagrined at my snark in this post. I did, though, honestly want the feedback from the community., Plus, what I've dug up about that particular COA still isn't cool (but not limited to EZ). I let that go, though.
I'll follow up with a proper review once I start my RS on the protocol and get past the 2 week point. And Randy, I've got some hospira so don't worry about my RS getting toilet water this time.
Thanks y'all@mmp nice
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login