@mydogdaryl423 @randy Yep. I reached out to them tonight and got an answer in just over an hour with an offer of refund/reship/store credit. But more importantly, they took full ownership for the whole shipment being wrong, not just the two -05 vials. I should have gotten all -07.

So yeah, I'm impressed, happy with the resolution, and a bit chagrined at my snark in this post. I did, though, honestly want the feedback from the community., Plus, what I've dug up about that particular COA still isn't cool (but not limited to EZ). I let that go, though.

I'll follow up with a proper review once I start my RS on the protocol and get past the 2 week point. And Randy, I've got some hospira so don't worry about my RS getting toilet water this time.
Thanks y'all

@mmp nice

First off, if this needs to be moved into the Discussion thread, sorry, wasn't sure.
Hi everyone. Been lurking here for a little while and really like the no BS discussions. Researching peps shouldn't be a game of spot-the-con. I've got an interesting (to me) situation. I'll try to be concise.

The order: 3 vials TB-500 Frag 17-23 10mg (not TB4) from EZ Peptides for a very specific, short-term project (hence the singles). I received them last night. 1 vial from the EZP-TBH06172026-06 batch and 2 vials from EZP-TBH05142026-05 batch. Call them -05 and -06

The problem:

1. Scan the QR on either vial marked with the -05 batch number and it takes you to the Janoshik report for the -06 batch.
2. Scan the QR on the -06 vial and you get the EZ COA report which has the link to Janoshik.
3. Go to the product page and that batch isn't even listed. There's a clear gap in the COA list. -04 -06 -07
4. Search their COA portal and it says the COA hasn't been released.
5. Go to their COA by Product page and the COA is listed under TB-500 but the links points to the -06 COA.
6. I went further but I'll stop

The question(s): How hard would you call them out on this? Refund? Replace? Would/could you trust any of their labels? If you're a TB-500 researcher, you'll remember that the -05 batch had a mean quantity of 7.52mg or -24.8%.

I'm less concerned about being shorted than I am about the obvious "mistake" they made. I've never had to deal with a vendor that has a good reputation but does something lousy. I've got deep-dive research that points to a concerted effort to scrub the -05 COA (all versions) from the public eye, but that's tin-foil hat territory. lol
I can share it if anyone wants.

Thanks for reading and for any advice. And if someone has the EZP version of that batch's COA, I'd love to have a copy. I have the Nexaph and Ameona versions but, maybe if I collect the set I'll win a free bottle of Uncle Wang's Toilet Water