@anthony I was a little disappointed when I saw this. Don't get me wrong, I think Nexaph is handling this the right way, putting it front and center and adding a discount, and while they are probably correct that this is an acceptable level of purity... its a bit below my personal risk tolerance. The source of my disappointment is I would really like to order some MOTS-C from them 
PeptideEd
Posts
-
Discussion: Nexaph -
Discussion: Nexaph@jamiegallien I've only also ever seen purity, identity, weight (and occasionally, as in 5-amino-1mq not purity and identity because Janoshik does not offer it for 5-amino-1mq). That said I did send three vials of my 5-amino-1mq from them out for testing for identity, purity, weight, heavy metals, and sterility and it it came back clean (purity over 99.7%, weight in normal range of overfills, sterile and without heavy metals).
-
Nexaph 5-amino-1-mg@myb I have a bunch of that batch as well. I haven't started using it yet, but I did sent three vials out for independent testing (I didn't like Janoshik's lack of purity testing). Came back 99.7% pure. Also ran heavy metal and sterility testing... came back clean on those too.
-
EZ Peptides COAs@mindset-modality I don't know for sure, but I have a pretty educated guess. EZ Peptides is basically the single vial arm of Nexaph. Janoshik, the lab the creates COAs for many suppliers including Nexaph, will, for a fee, allow an original supplier like Nexaph to create a new COA from the same initial sample for a subsidiary/affiliate. Nexaph sells vials in kits of 10 without per vial labels. So my guess is that you are seeing the hand written per-vial lables from Nexaph's samples when you look at EZ Peptides' COAs.
Please note that this is all above board, at least in my opinion. This is all broadly known and understood. Does that help at all?