Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community

Peptide Critic Community

  1. Randy the Rats Research Forum
  2. Vendor Reviews & Orders
  3. nexaph - BUYER BEWARE
Prize
Enter to Win a Gansulin Auto Injector Pen, with Carts a Pepboys Vial Storage Case
Ends in
3813 entries · 1000 participants
Enter →

nexaph - BUYER BEWARE

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vendor Reviews & Orders
nexaphqualitycustomer-servicereview
11 Posts 4 Posters 435 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RandyR Offline
    RandyR Offline
    Randy
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    I totally understand where you're coming from. I have the same batch. They did tell us. Realistically, the size of the puck has nothing to do with the contents.

    "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • RandyR Randy

      I totally understand where you're coming from. I have the same batch. They did tell us. Realistically, the size of the puck has nothing to do with the contents.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      matthewwalsh
      wrote last edited by matthewwalsh
      #3

      @Randy Yes, they have consistently defended their position (what else can they do?) but I have to say it doesn't instill confidence when the material is so different from vial to vial - anyone can see that. A visual inspection is the first step in any QC process which this does not pass. And unless every vial were to be tested - it can't be trusted - at least not by me.

      Something happened in the manufacturing process that caused this inconsistency and I'm suppose to inject my beloved rat with this - can't bring myself to do it - so $200 in the garbage. As a first and only time fool of theirs - I expected much better. To say they mentioned a "cosmetic issue" with the batch doesn't cover the inconsistency - I was expecting 10 vials with a small puck - that is what was advertised and that is not what was received.

      Of course, you have a much much longer track record and experience with this company and I don't. But I'm just relating my experience and I appreciate you allowing us to do so.

      RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • C Offline
        C Offline
        Commander
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        Shrunken puck? It looks more like disappeared puck…

        Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • M matthewwalsh

          @Randy Yes, they have consistently defended their position (what else can they do?) but I have to say it doesn't instill confidence when the material is so different from vial to vial - anyone can see that. A visual inspection is the first step in any QC process which this does not pass. And unless every vial were to be tested - it can't be trusted - at least not by me.

          Something happened in the manufacturing process that caused this inconsistency and I'm suppose to inject my beloved rat with this - can't bring myself to do it - so $200 in the garbage. As a first and only time fool of theirs - I expected much better. To say they mentioned a "cosmetic issue" with the batch doesn't cover the inconsistency - I was expecting 10 vials with a small puck - that is what was advertised and that is not what was received.

          Of course, you have a much much longer track record and experience with this company and I don't. But I'm just relating my experience and I appreciate you allowing us to do so.

          RandyR Offline
          RandyR Offline
          Randy
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @matthewwalsh wanna have some fun with that kit? I dont have any with a disappearing puck...but you do. Ill pay for some tests 🙂

          "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            matthewwalsh
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            Well, OK peptide guru... just tell me what you want me to do and I'll do it!

            RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • RandyR Randy

              @matthewwalsh wanna have some fun with that kit? I dont have any with a disappearing puck...but you do. Ill pay for some tests 🙂

              S Offline
              S Offline
              striving4awesome
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @Randy

              I have that same batch. Not as bad, but almost as bad as @matthewwalsh .

              I'm a member of a great Private Testing group over at Telegram. The testing group does very thorough testing on batches of interest. Much more than Mass/Purity. We always do Sterility, Endo. And most times, unless there are too few of us and the cost per person gets too high, we do the whole 9 yards (Heavy metals, etc.), and more, depending on how many participants and the total cost.

              A few of us have set up a testing sub-topic for this batch. It's still in the recruiting stage. There are 5 of us so far.

              I've christened this "The Ugly Duckling" batch, and it's been refined to "The Ugly Puckling" batch by the leader.

              I promise you'll love the group leader and the mods.

              Maybe we could get you to join us over there for a group test? And we can test the batch 9 ways to Sunday.

              If you're interested, reach out to me, I'll give you my Telegram username, and I'll send you an invite to the group.

              RandyR M 2 Replies Last reply
              4
              • M matthewwalsh

                Well, OK peptide guru... just tell me what you want me to do and I'll do it!

                RandyR Offline
                RandyR Offline
                Randy
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @matthewwalsh Check your DM's

                "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S striving4awesome

                  @Randy

                  I have that same batch. Not as bad, but almost as bad as @matthewwalsh .

                  I'm a member of a great Private Testing group over at Telegram. The testing group does very thorough testing on batches of interest. Much more than Mass/Purity. We always do Sterility, Endo. And most times, unless there are too few of us and the cost per person gets too high, we do the whole 9 yards (Heavy metals, etc.), and more, depending on how many participants and the total cost.

                  A few of us have set up a testing sub-topic for this batch. It's still in the recruiting stage. There are 5 of us so far.

                  I've christened this "The Ugly Duckling" batch, and it's been refined to "The Ugly Puckling" batch by the leader.

                  I promise you'll love the group leader and the mods.

                  Maybe we could get you to join us over there for a group test? And we can test the batch 9 ways to Sunday.

                  If you're interested, reach out to me, I'll give you my Telegram username, and I'll send you an invite to the group.

                  RandyR Offline
                  RandyR Offline
                  Randy
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @striving4awesome That sounds like an awesome group. Unless they have no issue with me blasting the results to the world (they usually dont) its probably not a fit. Ill have afi do mass/purity on the worst looking ones plus endo/sterility.

                  "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • RandyR Randy

                    @striving4awesome That sounds like an awesome group. Unless they have no issue with me blasting the results to the world (they usually dont) its probably not a fit. Ill have afi do mass/purity on the worst looking ones plus endo/sterility.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    striving4awesome
                    wrote last edited by striving4awesome
                    #10

                    @Randy

                    You know what, you're right; they usually aren't published.

                    But I have it pretty good with the group.

                    And.... This is a special situation.

                    I think they may be open to it here.

                    Want me to ask? I think I can get a yes for you.

                    I'd personally be thrilled to have you join us over there.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • S striving4awesome

                      @Randy

                      I have that same batch. Not as bad, but almost as bad as @matthewwalsh .

                      I'm a member of a great Private Testing group over at Telegram. The testing group does very thorough testing on batches of interest. Much more than Mass/Purity. We always do Sterility, Endo. And most times, unless there are too few of us and the cost per person gets too high, we do the whole 9 yards (Heavy metals, etc.), and more, depending on how many participants and the total cost.

                      A few of us have set up a testing sub-topic for this batch. It's still in the recruiting stage. There are 5 of us so far.

                      I've christened this "The Ugly Duckling" batch, and it's been refined to "The Ugly Puckling" batch by the leader.

                      I promise you'll love the group leader and the mods.

                      Maybe we could get you to join us over there for a group test? And we can test the batch 9 ways to Sunday.

                      If you're interested, reach out to me, I'll give you my Telegram username, and I'll send you an invite to the group.

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      matthewwalsh
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @striving4awesome So what I'm hearing is that your pucks & Jeff's are bigger than mine - so apparently size matters... 😉

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups