Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Vendor Reviews & Orders
  3. Nexaph User Review: $$$$$
Prize
Peptide Critic Case and Pens
Ends in
3814 entries · 1657 participants
Enter →

Nexaph User Review: $$$$$

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vendor Reviews & Orders
nexaphreviewmots-c
78 Posts 26 Posters 9.3k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Bronze41

    @Commander Do they have a telegram invite link or do you only deal with them on whatsapp?

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Bronze41
    wrote last edited by
    #45

    I see on their website you go to contact and find the sales rep. Thank you!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Offline
      C Offline
      Commander
      wrote last edited by
      #46

      Make sure it is their we site and not a scammer site. On their website is a link to their Telegram account.
      @randy Am I allowed to post a link to LN’s Telegram group?

      Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Commander

        Make sure it is their we site and not a scammer site. On their website is a link to their Telegram account.
        @randy Am I allowed to post a link to LN’s Telegram group?

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Stevepep
        wrote last edited by
        #47

        @Commander
        Please don’t want to get scammed it’s already happened to me with the bs website being a fake

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • MyBM Offline
          MyBM Offline
          MyB
          wrote last edited by
          #48

          @commander Post in grey zone and tag Stevepep or send it to him as a private message.

          Follows research backed science, not “trust me” bro’s.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • hunt_akH Offline
            hunt_akH Offline
            hunt_ak
            wrote last edited by
            #49

            @commander are you ordering through WhatsApp or Telegram from LN? I'd like that contact info if you can....

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Commander

              @alohayall

              Telegram is the best place. I know Telegram is a hot mess, run on texts with a 1000 different pictures of nothing that has to do with the topics being talked about.
              Seems like people are on there thst having nothing better to do than post worthless stuff. BUT that is the best place to find reliable grey vendors. I use LN Peptides for almost everything, but there are a few other vendors that have good deals on some stuff. I just picked up Buffered NAD500+ $80 a kit (10 vials), free shipping in the USA and it is shipped from the USA, from Barn.
              Best place to start is in the Stairway To Grey message section. Jeff (Randy) encouraged me to look there and he was 100% right, you cannot match the prices.
              LN Peptides, isn’t an approved vendor on STG, but they have the best prices I found. Ordered 5 big orders from them so far (3k each), got them all in 2 to 4 weeks. In my opinion they are the best (but my opinion doesn’t mean crap)
              One thing, before you start looking at Grey, no Cryto very well or you will get murdered in fees.
              I spent a couple of weeks figuring the best, cheapest way to buy and sell crypto. I will help you skip the pain I felt… Open a Robinhood account, link your debt card, open a Trust Wallet account. Buy USDC on Robinhood (no fees), then transfer it to your Trust Wallet (free) than transfer it from Trust Wallet to the vendor (in USDC-Sol) and there is less than $1 fees.
              Make sure you do your debit card in Robinhood, not bank account, debt card is instant purchase ($1000 every 24 hours limit). Bank account is 5 to 7 day hold…

              A Offline
              A Offline
              alohayall
              wrote last edited by
              #50

              @Commander thank you

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Commander

                Although Nexaph has fallen out of my favor for various reasons, they are the best prices you are going to get unless you go grey. You also get your product in usually 4 days or less.
                I won’t buy from them anymore, but for other reasons…

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Radasaurus
                wrote last edited by Radasaurus
                #51

                @Commander

                A few months ago, I was preparing to order from Nexaph, but then read all the negative reviews and saw their COA’s which seemed very suspicious.

                The complaints have been mostly about completely ineffective products (obviously a deliberate scam), and there are some who have tested the orders they received and results showed nothing in the vials! That was enough to scare me away - injecting God knows what into my bloodstream would be the epitome of stupid in my opinion, and a foolish risk I would never take.

                I attempted to warn prospective buyers on Reddit and, as usual, was verbally assaulted by some readers for having a dissenting opinion (go figure 🙄). Probably their employees, so I decided to just let natural selection eventually take over and let them be.

                RandyR C 2 Replies Last reply
                -2
                • MyBM Offline
                  MyBM Offline
                  MyB
                  wrote last edited by
                  #52

                  @radasaurus care to point us to the direction of Nexaph having nothing in the vials?
                  I know there was a recent incident where there was not filler/buffer pucks, but Randy had them tested and confirmed they contained the peptide.

                  Follows research backed science, not “trust me” bro’s.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • R Radasaurus

                    @Commander

                    A few months ago, I was preparing to order from Nexaph, but then read all the negative reviews and saw their COA’s which seemed very suspicious.

                    The complaints have been mostly about completely ineffective products (obviously a deliberate scam), and there are some who have tested the orders they received and results showed nothing in the vials! That was enough to scare me away - injecting God knows what into my bloodstream would be the epitome of stupid in my opinion, and a foolish risk I would never take.

                    I attempted to warn prospective buyers on Reddit and, as usual, was verbally assaulted by some readers for having a dissenting opinion (go figure 🙄). Probably their employees, so I decided to just let natural selection eventually take over and let them be.

                    RandyR Offline
                    RandyR Offline
                    Randy
                    wrote last edited by Randy
                    #53

                    @Radasaurus if there is an actual issue with nexaph please share it. Nobody is going to accost you. We don't get tribal with our fat juice suppliers here.

                    Id love to see these tests, or any screenshots, the suspicious COA's etc.

                    "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                    R 2 Replies Last reply
                    1
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      stevencarter
                      wrote last edited by
                      #54

                      Nexaph has been very good to me as far as price and quality. The whole making a profile thing tk see the prices isnt a big deal. I dont understand why this person wanted to talk trash on nexaph. I have researched reta, tesa/ipa, kpv, pda, and tb4 from nexaph over the past 4 months and im about to go back and get some mots c. There is absolutely no reason at all to complain about the price either. Nexaph is like half the price of what peptide sciences used to be. I say keep up the good work.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • RandyR Randy

                        @Radasaurus if there is an actual issue with nexaph please share it. Nobody is going to accost you. We don't get tribal with our fat juice suppliers here.

                        Id love to see these tests, or any screenshots, the suspicious COA's etc.

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Radasaurus
                        wrote last edited by Radasaurus
                        #55

                        @Randy
                        Go to trustpilot.com. Here’s also a link to Finnrick’s testing results for Nexaph, which is also very negative: https://www.finnrick.com/vendors/nexaph

                        They score low in quantity and quality in many test results and even content - in a recent test from May shows between 8-12% of the claimed content of product (in this case retatrutide). And God forbid you complain to them, they don’t respond and will blacklist you from their Telegram group.

                        P S 2 Replies Last reply
                        -1
                        • R Radasaurus

                          @Randy
                          Go to trustpilot.com. Here’s also a link to Finnrick’s testing results for Nexaph, which is also very negative: https://www.finnrick.com/vendors/nexaph

                          They score low in quantity and quality in many test results and even content - in a recent test from May shows between 8-12% of the claimed content of product (in this case retatrutide). And God forbid you complain to them, they don’t respond and will blacklist you from their Telegram group.

                          P Offline
                          P Offline
                          PeptidePete
                          wrote last edited by
                          #56

                          @Radasaurus said:

                          @Randy
                          Go to trustpilot.com. Here’s also a link to Finnrick’s testing results for Nexaph, which is also very negative: https://www.finnrick.com/vendors/nexaph

                          A-ha...Someone either needs higher quality due diligence or "something else" is afoot.

                          Finnrick has zero credibility in my world and I care deeply about quantified quality. This particular red herring has been debunked multiple times but I guess the hook continues to catch unsuspecting fish (holy mixed metaphors). IYKYK.

                          Much of my deep stash is NEXAPH and I love doing business with them.

                          Cheers

                          R 2 Replies Last reply
                          3
                          • P PeptidePete

                            @Radasaurus said:

                            @Randy
                            Go to trustpilot.com. Here’s also a link to Finnrick’s testing results for Nexaph, which is also very negative: https://www.finnrick.com/vendors/nexaph

                            A-ha...Someone either needs higher quality due diligence or "something else" is afoot.

                            Finnrick has zero credibility in my world and I care deeply about quantified quality. This particular red herring has been debunked multiple times but I guess the hook continues to catch unsuspecting fish (holy mixed metaphors). IYKYK.

                            Much of my deep stash is NEXAPH and I love doing business with them.

                            Cheers

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Radasaurus
                            wrote last edited by
                            #57

                            @PeptidePete
                            Cheers? Good grief 🙄.

                            Someone asked where I saw the reviews and I replied - blow your money and inject whatever you like into your bloodstream, I could care less. In fact, I suggest you double your dosages.

                            As with the assaults from the Reddit clowns, I wish you the best of luck surviving natural selection.

                            WisGal64W 1 Reply Last reply
                            -1
                            • P PeptidePete

                              @Radasaurus said:

                              @Randy
                              Go to trustpilot.com. Here’s also a link to Finnrick’s testing results for Nexaph, which is also very negative: https://www.finnrick.com/vendors/nexaph

                              A-ha...Someone either needs higher quality due diligence or "something else" is afoot.

                              Finnrick has zero credibility in my world and I care deeply about quantified quality. This particular red herring has been debunked multiple times but I guess the hook continues to catch unsuspecting fish (holy mixed metaphors). IYKYK.

                              Much of my deep stash is NEXAPH and I love doing business with them.

                              Cheers

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Radasaurus
                              wrote last edited by
                              #58

                              @PeptidePete
                              Cheers? Good grief 🙄.

                              Someone asked where I saw the reviews and I replied - blow your money and inject whatever you like into your bloodstream, I could care less. In fact, I suggest you double your dosages.

                              As with the assaults from the Reddit clowns, I wish you the best of luck surviving natural selection.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              -1
                              • R Radasaurus

                                @Commander

                                A few months ago, I was preparing to order from Nexaph, but then read all the negative reviews and saw their COA’s which seemed very suspicious.

                                The complaints have been mostly about completely ineffective products (obviously a deliberate scam), and there are some who have tested the orders they received and results showed nothing in the vials! That was enough to scare me away - injecting God knows what into my bloodstream would be the epitome of stupid in my opinion, and a foolish risk I would never take.

                                I attempted to warn prospective buyers on Reddit and, as usual, was verbally assaulted by some readers for having a dissenting opinion (go figure 🙄). Probably their employees, so I decided to just let natural selection eventually take over and let them be.

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Commander
                                wrote last edited by
                                #59

                                @Radasaurus
                                I test a couple of their products after my first test of one of their products came back 30% lower dose than their COA said. I took a lot of shit for it. I will never use them again based on the test results I got back and when I confronted Nexaph they wouldn’t even return my emails. But in my opinion, they are good for anyone else who wants to argue for them, buy away. I moved on.
                                So now I test everything! I have had a couple things from different vendors come back a lot lower than what the Vendors COAs said. I keep that to myself.
                                My suggestion, test your stuff - DO NOT WARN ANYONE if the test results come back different from the vendors COA. I do not care what ANYONE says, they will challenge you and argue with you how you are wrong and whoever you used to test is wrong and bla bla bla..
                                I have been there done that. I really don’t care what other people think or inject, I don’t care if other people get results or not. Instead of arguing either you, they should just pay themselves and send the same stuff out as you, then they would have a leg to stand on.
                                But what you will always see is people arguing with you about your test results when they were too cheap to send them out themselves.
                                And for anyone who says, that is wrong we don’t argue bla bla bla, save it, spend your own money and have your stuff tested.

                                Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Radasaurus
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #60

                                  Yep, 100%. I try to save people their hard earned money and from doing something stupid by injecting garbage. It’s usually on Reddit but now here… every time - like you said - a few nut jobs have some strange gene that makes them only want to insult you for having an opinion that differs from theirs. Go figure.

                                  This nutter even downgraded my comments so now I can’t give a thumbs up to applaud someone for their contributions on the site. Also like you said, I’m done trying to warn and help out fellow biohackers 🙄. Eventually Darwinism will take over and buying/injecting themselves with garbage will weed them out of existence, which is good for humanity long term 🤣.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • RandyR Randy

                                    @Radasaurus if there is an actual issue with nexaph please share it. Nobody is going to accost you. We don't get tribal with our fat juice suppliers here.

                                    Id love to see these tests, or any screenshots, the suspicious COA's etc.

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Radasaurus
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #61

                                    @Randy unfortunately there is a bad egg in every batch and I DID get accosted here for having a dissenting opinion (based on data) that differed from his.

                                    So I’m done here, just like with Reddit. I simply don’t need the grief.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    -4
                                    • MyBM Offline
                                      MyBM Offline
                                      MyB
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #62

                                      @radasaurus Proof would be a COA from a test, whether yours or someone else’s .
                                      What’s not proof is a review you read somewhere else like TrustPilot, or pointing to Finnricks letter grading. That is most likely why you got down voted.

                                      Follows research backed science, not “trust me” bro’s.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        PeptideEd
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #63

                                        @radasaurus Here's what I've seen so far from Nexaph. Fennrick doesn't like them because Fennrick weights heavily whether the sample's mass matches the label. Nexaph tends to overfill a bit. If that's a problem for someone, then they probably shouldn't use Nexaph. It is however a very common problem, and I've rarely found a vendor who doesn't have it.

                                        What I do know is I've run my own testing on two different batches of their 5-amino-1mq. I choose to do this specifically for 5-amino-1mq because Nexaph runs all of their testing through Jashonik. For 5-amino-1mq Jashonik doesn't provide purity testing. I'm a bit of a stickler on wanting purity testing.. so for each of two batches of their 5-amino-1mg I ran three vials from each batch through Analytic Formulations for testing for mass, purity, heavy metals, endotoxins, and sterility. Passed on all counts with flying colors.

                                        I don't do my own testing for everything I buy from them. But I do have their COAs, and on telegram the community donates vials they have received from batches ordered from Nexaph for testing as well... and so I have those COAs as well.

                                        Is it perfect: absolutely not. I could point out to you at great lengths the potential weaknesses in the chain that could be exploited by a vendor who is actively seeking to cheat you. Is it better than what I get from a telehealth vendor working with a compounding pharmacy: enormously (try finding dosages or any proof of them meeting standards on their websites... I'll wait).

                                        I'm a trust but verify kind of person. I've got the training and background to make decent (not good, but decent) risk evaluations based on data. I trust Nexaph exactly as far as I can verify them. That said... I feel better about their verification than I do about most folks.

                                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • P PeptideEd

                                          @radasaurus Here's what I've seen so far from Nexaph. Fennrick doesn't like them because Fennrick weights heavily whether the sample's mass matches the label. Nexaph tends to overfill a bit. If that's a problem for someone, then they probably shouldn't use Nexaph. It is however a very common problem, and I've rarely found a vendor who doesn't have it.

                                          What I do know is I've run my own testing on two different batches of their 5-amino-1mq. I choose to do this specifically for 5-amino-1mq because Nexaph runs all of their testing through Jashonik. For 5-amino-1mq Jashonik doesn't provide purity testing. I'm a bit of a stickler on wanting purity testing.. so for each of two batches of their 5-amino-1mg I ran three vials from each batch through Analytic Formulations for testing for mass, purity, heavy metals, endotoxins, and sterility. Passed on all counts with flying colors.

                                          I don't do my own testing for everything I buy from them. But I do have their COAs, and on telegram the community donates vials they have received from batches ordered from Nexaph for testing as well... and so I have those COAs as well.

                                          Is it perfect: absolutely not. I could point out to you at great lengths the potential weaknesses in the chain that could be exploited by a vendor who is actively seeking to cheat you. Is it better than what I get from a telehealth vendor working with a compounding pharmacy: enormously (try finding dosages or any proof of them meeting standards on their websites... I'll wait).

                                          I'm a trust but verify kind of person. I've got the training and background to make decent (not good, but decent) risk evaluations based on data. I trust Nexaph exactly as far as I can verify them. That said... I feel better about their verification than I do about most folks.

                                          P Offline
                                          P Offline
                                          PeptidePete
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #64

                                          @PeptideEd said:

                                          @radasaurus Here's what I've seen so far from Nexaph. Fennrick doesn't like them because Fennrick weights heavily whether the sample's mass matches the label. Nexaph tends to overfill a bit. If that's a problem for someone, then they probably shouldn't use Nexaph. It is however a very common problem, and I've rarely found a vendor who doesn't have it.

                                          What I do know is I've run my own testing on two different batches of their 5-amino-1mq. I choose to do this specifically for 5-amino-1mq because Nexaph runs all of their testing through Jashonik. For 5-amino-1mq Jashonik doesn't provide purity testing. I'm a bit of a stickler on wanting purity testing.. so for each of two batches of their 5-amino-1mg I ran three vials from each batch through Analytic Formulations for testing for mass, purity, heavy metals, endotoxins, and sterility. Passed on all counts with flying colors.

                                          I don't do my own testing for everything I buy from them. But I do have their COAs, and on telegram the community donates vials they have received from batches ordered from Nexaph for testing as well... and so I have those COAs as well.

                                          Is it perfect: absolutely not. I could point out to you at great lengths the potential weaknesses in the chain that could be exploited by a vendor who is actively seeking to cheat you. Is it better than what I get from a telehealth vendor working with a compounding pharmacy: enormously (try finding dosages or any proof of them meeting standards on their websites... I'll wait).

                                          I'm a trust but verify kind of person. I've got the training and background to make decent (not good, but decent) risk evaluations based on data. I trust Nexaph exactly as far as I can verify them. That said... I feel better about their verification than I do about most folks.

                                          But Finnrick? And selfless care for others?

                                          😂

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups