Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Vendor Reviews & Orders
  3. Nexaph User Review: Excellent experience
Prize
Three Pens + Filters & Cartridges
Ends in
11899 entries · 4856 participants
Enter →

Nexaph User Review: Excellent experience

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vendor Reviews & Orders
nexaphreviewglp2-t
27 Posts 13 Posters 2.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Commander

    @stevensanto
    Like I said, they pick the vials they send to get tested..
    All I know is I sent out their CJC/Ipa blend for testing and it came back 30% less mass than their testing..

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Stevepep
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @Commander Gotcha ya you are talking about volume. My main concern is purity. 30pct is a big difference, though.

    C 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      matthewwalsh
      wrote last edited by matthewwalsh
      #12

      I've written plenty on here about my one and only experience with Nexaph - look it up if you want. Needless to say, I'll never do business with them again - 1 and done for me. If you have an issue with their product, don't expect any customer satisfaction from them - you'll be on your own. They are NOT here to serve that's for sure.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • S Stevepep

        @Commander Gotcha ya you are talking about volume. My main concern is purity. 30pct is a big difference, though.

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Commander
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @stevensanto
        Know how much is in that vial is VERY important for certain peps, reta, tiz, tesa, etc…

        Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • NewenoughN Offline
          NewenoughN Offline
          Newenough
          wrote last edited by Newenough
          #14

          There is an extensive article written and posted here on Peptide Critic about how Nexpah was potentially OVERFILLING of vials. Don't get me wrong, if it's over, it's still not correct. The article goes into more on how the different labs do the weighing, and techniques used. Also, I've read a number of post on the GLP forum, and reddit of people testing Nexpah products, and being good with the results. So, all I can say is it's not a perfect system we chose to play in, but it's a hell of a lot safer than rolling the btc dice and hoping for the best. People are getting better at policing these companies , and if Nexpah was a bad seed, it would have already been uprooted given the community involvement these days.

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • C Offline
            C Offline
            Commander
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            Who said Nexaph is a bad seed? They are just the same as the rest of the suppliers. You need to test ANY supplier. You are rolling the dice with all of them

            Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mrjoshua44M Offline
              mrjoshua44M Offline
              mrjoshua44
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              I've had nothing but great experiences ordering from Nexaph. I've ordered their Sermorelin, GHK-cu and KPV kits, and about to order the TB4 and MOTS-C kits.

              1 Reply Last reply
              4
              • J Offline
                J Offline
                jborja
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @randy hi Randy and Jeff. Hope you guys are well/ forgive me if this is the wrong thread to ask this, but can you help explain to a learning newb how yall are verifying that Nexaph and Ezpeptides are synthesizing in the US, as oppose to just warehousing? I struggled to explain to another fellow researcher. The TG groups even ran Cain’s videos pinned through a bit of AI and it came out that a lot of factors (materials and equipment used) are of US origin. Thanks in advance.

                RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Stevepep

                  @jasonkoerner Reta from Nexaph is terrific. I trusted their test and checked the QR code for the test and the vial top and was satisfied, and it works. I just ordered more. You can test at Freedom for $200 others are $300 there is a place in Florida that does it for $150. I have only tested for purity.

                  DRTasCanBD Offline
                  DRTasCanBD Offline
                  DRTasCanB
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @Stevepep what about finnrick? I may not be hip to something... But their website says that they will test user submitted vials for free. Is there something I'm missing about that? I also have ordered from Nexaph, very quick shipping. I would prefer if they had the mass spectrometry test as well the HPLC. There have been a lot of "bad" test results of user submitted vials of Nexaphs retatrutide on finnrick. Almost all of them revolve around the MG per vial...and 95% of those are because they are overfilled. The retatrutide has an E rating, which is the worst finnrick gives in believe, and I think it's 83+ samples..or maybe 93. I still bought from Nexaph, because across the board on forums and communities .. it has received high praise, and finnricks negatives are almost all because of overfill.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • DRTasCanBD Offline
                    DRTasCanBD Offline
                    DRTasCanB
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    In general, on finnrick, Nexaph has almost all.bad ratings, with the exception of BPC-157 or TB-500, I can't remember which one. And it was a B. I have not used either the Reta or the N-acetyl semax amidate that I got from there, but as soon as I do I will post a review.

                    RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • DRTasCanBD DRTasCanB

                      @Stevepep what about finnrick? I may not be hip to something... But their website says that they will test user submitted vials for free. Is there something I'm missing about that? I also have ordered from Nexaph, very quick shipping. I would prefer if they had the mass spectrometry test as well the HPLC. There have been a lot of "bad" test results of user submitted vials of Nexaphs retatrutide on finnrick. Almost all of them revolve around the MG per vial...and 95% of those are because they are overfilled. The retatrutide has an E rating, which is the worst finnrick gives in believe, and I think it's 83+ samples..or maybe 93. I still bought from Nexaph, because across the board on forums and communities .. it has received high praise, and finnricks negatives are almost all because of overfill.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stevepep
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @DRTasCanB bottom line finnrivks scoring is complete crap. If you check identity and purity on Nexaph it’s all good they were overweight so they gave them a crap score meaning they overfilled which is on the COA. Finnrick has a bunch of Chinese companies with great score and no websites or contact info. Just use them for identify and purity

                      DRTasCanBD 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • DRTasCanBD DRTasCanB

                        In general, on finnrick, Nexaph has almost all.bad ratings, with the exception of BPC-157 or TB-500, I can't remember which one. And it was a B. I have not used either the Reta or the N-acetyl semax amidate that I got from there, but as soon as I do I will post a review.

                        RandyR Offline
                        RandyR Offline
                        Randy
                        wrote last edited by Randy
                        #21

                        @DRTasCanB finnrick is a clown show. I don't care about their rating. What matters is how much is in the vial and if it's what it's supposed to be. Every single nextaph test is what its supposed to be. Nexaph overfills. Hence the bad rating.

                        And just so we're clear, I can send finnrick a vial of shitty oxytocin from China and say it's nexaph tirzepatide. They will test it and post the failed result. Makes you wonder if anyone's ever done this (they have)

                        I've spent north of 15K with them over the years. Its the easy button

                        "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                        DRTasCanBD N 2 Replies Last reply
                        3
                        • J jborja

                          @randy hi Randy and Jeff. Hope you guys are well/ forgive me if this is the wrong thread to ask this, but can you help explain to a learning newb how yall are verifying that Nexaph and Ezpeptides are synthesizing in the US, as oppose to just warehousing? I struggled to explain to another fellow researcher. The TG groups even ran Cain’s videos pinned through a bit of AI and it came out that a lot of factors (materials and equipment used) are of US origin. Thanks in advance.

                          RandyR Offline
                          RandyR Offline
                          Randy
                          wrote last edited by Randy
                          #22

                          @jborja We are aware of where they order some of their raws from. Nobody orders raws unless they're finishing the product.

                          The location of the lyophalizing has always been a significant controversy surrounding them. Could they be dipping into Chinese finished supply? Sure.

                          Another thing I should note is Cane pissed a lot of people in STG off because he wouldn't play ball with them, which is why they're blacklisted in there and a lot of the "OG's" dislike them. This is where the bad attitude towards them comes from. We are also blacklisted in there because I'm very open that the people running STG are a cabal of dingbats that can't get past taking kickbacks from chinese resellers.

                          Whether it's finished in the states or not really doesn't matter. What matters is a consistent record of delivering quality research products. There have been hiccups but in my experience they have always been addressed and handled properly.

                          We do have an affiliate relationship with EZPeptides. We dont with nexaph....and I consistently just say go there.

                          "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • RandyR Randy

                            @DRTasCanB finnrick is a clown show. I don't care about their rating. What matters is how much is in the vial and if it's what it's supposed to be. Every single nextaph test is what its supposed to be. Nexaph overfills. Hence the bad rating.

                            And just so we're clear, I can send finnrick a vial of shitty oxytocin from China and say it's nexaph tirzepatide. They will test it and post the failed result. Makes you wonder if anyone's ever done this (they have)

                            I've spent north of 15K with them over the years. Its the easy button

                            DRTasCanBD Offline
                            DRTasCanBD Offline
                            DRTasCanB
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            @Randy Awesome. I appreciate the clarity on that.
                            I have been wondering what was up with them, and now I know. As far as Nexaph goes, I ignored finnrick on them as well, because of this community and others giving Nexaph a ton of praise. This is the very community that pointed me in Nexaphs direction.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            -1
                            • S Stevepep

                              @DRTasCanB bottom line finnrivks scoring is complete crap. If you check identity and purity on Nexaph it’s all good they were overweight so they gave them a crap score meaning they overfilled which is on the COA. Finnrick has a bunch of Chinese companies with great score and no websites or contact info. Just use them for identify and purity

                              DRTasCanBD Offline
                              DRTasCanBD Offline
                              DRTasCanB
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              @stevepep i am glad that @randy and yourself cleared that up for me. Again, ignored them as well, and like I said in the previous post, they were getting bad scores almost exclusively for being overfilled, and that's why I ignored finnrick.

                              Now knowing that communities in general avoid finnrick testing, and why, I am glad I went with my gut instinct on Nexaph and bought anyways. This community, and the post on the Uncle Wang batch was the reason I went with Nexaph despite finnrick. I actually switch from evolvebiopep, to Nexaph.

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • DRTasCanBD DRTasCanB

                                @stevepep i am glad that @randy and yourself cleared that up for me. Again, ignored them as well, and like I said in the previous post, they were getting bad scores almost exclusively for being overfilled, and that's why I ignored finnrick.

                                Now knowing that communities in general avoid finnrick testing, and why, I am glad I went with my gut instinct on Nexaph and bought anyways. This community, and the post on the Uncle Wang batch was the reason I went with Nexaph despite finnrick. I actually switch from evolvebiopep, to Nexaph.

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stevepep
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                @DRTasCanB I find Nexaph to be great. Tons of people use them as a more expensive grey but you know what you are getting. It’s my go to. Crush is another good one. They are similar but do the drop nonsense

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Christopher
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  Nexaph is now my go-to vendor for peptides, and occasionally I'll use their sister site EZ-peps if researching something new. I've yet to have any issues with their products, pricing is great vs single-vial vendors, shipping is fast and the few times I've reached out to Cane I've gotten a quick response. No hairs in my vials or cracked ones either 🙂

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • RandyR Randy

                                    @DRTasCanB finnrick is a clown show. I don't care about their rating. What matters is how much is in the vial and if it's what it's supposed to be. Every single nextaph test is what its supposed to be. Nexaph overfills. Hence the bad rating.

                                    And just so we're clear, I can send finnrick a vial of shitty oxytocin from China and say it's nexaph tirzepatide. They will test it and post the failed result. Makes you wonder if anyone's ever done this (they have)

                                    I've spent north of 15K with them over the years. Its the easy button

                                    N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    NotThatCreative
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27
                                    This post is deleted!
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0

                                    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                    Register Login
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups