Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community

Peptide Critic Community

  1. Randy the Rats Research Forum
  2. Supplies, Mixing & Storage
  3. Reconstitution using COA mg mass information?
Prize
Red, White & Blue V2 Pens
Ends in
3023 entries · 1000 participants
Enter →

Reconstitution using COA mg mass information?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Supplies, Mixing & Storage
glp3-rreconstitution
10 Posts 6 Posters 221 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Totorosaurus
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    From reading the blog post https://peptidecritic.com/blog/why-test-results-vary-between-labs-multi-lab-coa-comparison, I started to wonder about how much it might matter which mg number is used for the reconstitution calculations.

    Given the variation between COAs as well as variation between individual vials from the same assumed origin batch, how should that mg mass report be used for reconstitution?
    The variations go from 0.17 mg to 2.8 mg over a baseline expected 10.0 mg.
    If reconstituted as expected for 10 mg, the additional dose per expected mg would be anywhere from 0.017 mg to 0.28 mg over?
    Is that even statistically or bioactively significant?
    In other words, should we be reconstituting for the expected mass of mg or at the COA reported mass of mg?
    Overfill for higher mg mass would be smaller additional dosages, so would it really matter at all?

    Thanks for your thoughts!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      markgroce
      wrote last edited by markgroce
      #2

      Funny, I read that, and had the same question. My thought was anyone sitting on either the low or high end of titration may be affected? Maybe? Curious myself...

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Offline
        R Offline
        ResearchCat
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        I usually average the COA test results, or if only one then I use that. Most of the stuff I get is 10-20% overfilled. The way I see it, for most peptides, if I take a little more or a littler less, it (probably) isn’t a big deal. But if I take too much of a GLP-1, I might make myself or my wife sick.

        I always recommend starting slow and working your way up if you are new to a peptide or aren’t comfortable with the dose accuracy.

        100% Natty. You know, aside from the Klow, Tesa, Tirz, CJC/Ipa, SS-31, Semax, Dihexa, Epitalon, MOTS-C, creatine, Cheetos, protein shakes, and a holocaust of chicken thighs.

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • T Offline
          T Offline
          Totorosaurus
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          My rat is at 8mg reta so I'd rather not get a 2mg overage by not accounting for the COA mass. Probably going to drop back to 6 then 4 mg since 60 lbs down over 8 months to a maintenence dose.
          Other rats starting so I'm trying to dial in a responsible set of reconstitution and dosing metrics.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Hammertime65H Offline
            Hammertime65H Offline
            Hammertime65
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            I got some Mots 40 that tested at 45. That's the number I'm going with when reconstituting.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • hunt_akH Offline
              hunt_akH Offline
              hunt_ak
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @hammertime65 seems reasonable as that's more than a 10% discrepancy on dosage. What's a guy to do in this realm of potential inaccuracy, shooting with kentucky windage, and hoping for the best...haha!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Offline
                R Offline
                ResearchCat
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @hunt_ak start low and titrate up.

                100% Natty. You know, aside from the Klow, Tesa, Tirz, CJC/Ipa, SS-31, Semax, Dihexa, Epitalon, MOTS-C, creatine, Cheetos, protein shakes, and a holocaust of chicken thighs.

                hunt_akH 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R ResearchCat

                  @hunt_ak start low and titrate up.

                  hunt_akH Offline
                  hunt_akH Offline
                  hunt_ak
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @ResearchCat said:

                  @hunt_ak start low and titrate up.

                  Always, agree 100%

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • R ResearchCat

                    I usually average the COA test results, or if only one then I use that. Most of the stuff I get is 10-20% overfilled. The way I see it, for most peptides, if I take a little more or a littler less, it (probably) isn’t a big deal. But if I take too much of a GLP-1, I might make myself or my wife sick.

                    I always recommend starting slow and working your way up if you are new to a peptide or aren’t comfortable with the dose accuracy.

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    theckman80
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @ResearchCat I also average the three vial mass measurements.

                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • T theckman80

                      @ResearchCat I also average the three vial mass measurements.

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      theckman80
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      Ive been keeping sn eye on the discord and telegram groups for third party testing and taking data. So fsr the stuff I've ordered has been lived across those and the tests provided by who I've purchased from.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups