Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Nexaph 3rd Party Testing
Prize
Peptide Critic Case and Pens
Ends in
3814 entries · 1657 participants
Enter →

Nexaph 3rd Party Testing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
glp2-tbeginner-questionlab-test
62 Posts 21 Posters 10.1k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • WesEqualshXcW WesEqualshXc

    I’m a noob as well but the way I understand it is the Nexaph telegram group is used so that researchers donate a sample from their own kits and Nexaph pays for the test. My understanding is that this gives researchers a reasonable assumption that the company didn’t “hand pick” certain samples they knew would look good on a COA. Thus making it more of a “random” and “fair” test. They only test for mass content and purity. So the benefit of a third party group test in my eyes would be that researchers could do more tests, (sterility, endotoxins, heavy metals) and a plus would be that you could get more samples to average out mass content. Being new to a lot of this. I will do the third party group testing. It just makes me feel more warmer and fuzzier inside.

    P Offline
    P Offline
    PeptideEd
    wrote last edited by
    #42

    @WesEqualshXc It also reduces (but does not eliminate) the possibility that Nexaph is shipping multiple batches under a single batches testing, because effectively the vials being tested are randomized across all the vials they send out under a given batch ID. Its all a statistical game, but the probabilities are better with Nexaph than with many others.

    I am generally a fan of Nexaph, and use them for many many things... but one thing I'm not a fan of is certain compounds (like 5-amino-1mq) Janoshik does not offer purity tests for (only mass tests) and since Nexaph exclusively uses Janoshik (for reasons I broadly agree with) I don't personally trust those tests. So I run my own. And what I can say is that at least for 5-amino-1mq not only do the third party tests I've commissioned directly via Analytic Formulations come back at excellent purity and acceptable (to me) mass (a bit overfilled, but manageable) but also are clean on sterility, heavy metals, and endotoxins.

    Again, its a statistical game, so take that simply as more data points to add into the risk tolerance computation 🙂

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • RandyR Randy

      @Stevepep

      This is the endo and mass/purity from the illustrious JEEP/BARN T30 batch from january. These results woke a lot of people up.

      https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/136052-Sterility2_A749RCAF7WEC

      https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/105625-TR30_HCGBEYR4X5CV

      K Offline
      K Offline
      kmckinley
      wrote last edited by
      #43

      @Randy What happens to the kits once these kinds of results are released? This is a little scary!

      RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K kmckinley

        @Randy What happens to the kits once these kinds of results are released? This is a little scary!

        RandyR Offline
        RandyR Offline
        Randy
        wrote last edited by Randy
        #44

        @kmckinley nothing.

        They claimed they we're taking steps and found the source blah blah blah "excipient testing". I'm aware, a few people asked for refunds and got them and there are others that are still filtering that batch.

        There was a issue with purity on a motsc batch and they did store credit. I had a bottle where the crimp was messed up and they gave me a refund for that.

        I do believe they do their best and they're trying to do the right thing but just realize their batches are 30,000 bottles and you're getting results for three of those bottles.

        Still less shady than Jenny on WhatsApp.

        "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

        K C 2 Replies Last reply
        1
        • RandyR Randy

          @kmckinley nothing.

          They claimed they we're taking steps and found the source blah blah blah "excipient testing". I'm aware, a few people asked for refunds and got them and there are others that are still filtering that batch.

          There was a issue with purity on a motsc batch and they did store credit. I had a bottle where the crimp was messed up and they gave me a refund for that.

          I do believe they do their best and they're trying to do the right thing but just realize their batches are 30,000 bottles and you're getting results for three of those bottles.

          Still less shady than Jenny on WhatsApp.

          K Offline
          K Offline
          kmckinley
          wrote last edited by
          #45

          @Randy Yikes! So, I am assuming they continue to sell said batches on the site? It is good to know they refunded some and I guess just like anything else we buy that breaks but I would hope they would have to "recall" or remove them as a safety precaution.

          RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • RandyR Randy

            @kmckinley nothing.

            They claimed they we're taking steps and found the source blah blah blah "excipient testing". I'm aware, a few people asked for refunds and got them and there are others that are still filtering that batch.

            There was a issue with purity on a motsc batch and they did store credit. I had a bottle where the crimp was messed up and they gave me a refund for that.

            I do believe they do their best and they're trying to do the right thing but just realize their batches are 30,000 bottles and you're getting results for three of those bottles.

            Still less shady than Jenny on WhatsApp.

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Commander
            wrote last edited by
            #46

            @Randy
            Although this is true, Jenny on WhatsApp is much hotter…. I am sure that is her real picture!!!

            Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

            RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • C Commander

              @Randy
              Although this is true, Jenny on WhatsApp is much hotter…. I am sure that is her real picture!!!

              RandyR Offline
              RandyR Offline
              Randy
              wrote last edited by
              #47

              @Commander its definitely her. Not some overweight middle aged man named Huang.

              "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

              1 Reply Last reply
              5
              • K kmckinley

                @Randy Yikes! So, I am assuming they continue to sell said batches on the site? It is good to know they refunded some and I guess just like anything else we buy that breaks but I would hope they would have to "recall" or remove them as a safety precaution.

                RandyR Offline
                RandyR Offline
                Randy
                wrote last edited by Randy
                #48

                @kmckinley no. I didnt say that. These sell out long before the sterility results from group tests come back. T30 is usually a presale and sells out at that point. That was the one failure we've seen in many hundreds of batches.

                "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                K 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • RandyR Randy

                  @kmckinley no. I didnt say that. These sell out long before the sterility results from group tests come back. T30 is usually a presale and sells out at that point. That was the one failure we've seen in many hundreds of batches.

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kmckinley
                  wrote last edited by
                  #49

                  @Randy That's not bad then considering the volume of product.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • vpepsV Online
                    vpepsV Online
                    vpeps
                    wrote last edited by
                    #50
                    This post is deleted!
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Stevepep

                      If anyone knows it would be interesting to get an answer. If purity is over 99pct most are over 99.5pct is it even statistically possible to have enough endotoxins or heavy metals to fail? The Jano guy straight up said it’s a waste of time. (I am paraphrasing) the Nexaph people apparently feel this way. Same for sterility. Most people believe the difference between 99.5 and 100 or whatever is just moisture from the manufacturing process or degradation. We see this is the random testing on telegram they always pass in the Nexaph threads.

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      JtCjEfF
                      wrote last edited by
                      #51

                      @Stevepep I just watched a video on YT, from "PepTok" (Rory from Crush) and he interviews Trustpoint Analytical. Starting at about 7:30 he has the best explanation on the differences Ive heard yet. This, combined with several other comments about LPS from other well know podcasters, specifically Huberman, and Im starting to have a better understanding.
                      Thought I would mention it here. Maybe it helps. I am not linking it here because my dumbass hasn't read all of the forum rules and I dont want to get in trouble.

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • WisGal64W Offline
                        WisGal64W Offline
                        WisGal64
                        wrote last edited by
                        #52

                        @jtcjeff can you share it in a DM? very interested in hearing what they have to say

                        “Not a guru, not a chemist-just here trying to keep my receptors AND my sanity responsive.”

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Stevepep

                          @ResearchCat the endotoxin testing is an interesting topic. According to the Jano guy with purity levels well over 90 pct it’s impossible for the toxins to be high enough not to pass so it’s unnecessary testing.

                          pep_researcherP Offline
                          pep_researcherP Offline
                          pep_researcher
                          wrote last edited by
                          #53
                          This post is deleted!
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Stevepep

                            @ResearchCat the endotoxin testing is an interesting topic. According to the Jano guy with purity levels well over 90 pct it’s impossible for the toxins to be high enough not to pass so it’s unnecessary testing.

                            pep_researcherP Offline
                            pep_researcherP Offline
                            pep_researcher
                            wrote last edited by pep_researcher
                            #54

                            @Stevepep said:

                            @ResearchCat the endotoxin testing is an interesting topic. According to the Jano guy with purity levels well over 90 pct it’s impossible for the toxins to be high enough not to pass so it’s unnecessary testing.

                            This is not true. Peter said endotoxin failures are rare, but not zero. He gave percentage failures in an interview. Endotoxins and purity have no correlation. A 99% pure product can still have high enough endotoxins.

                            The only nuance is endotoxin effect depends on research subject's weight and per dose endotoxin exposure. There's some limit you can find online.

                            Recently when JEEP Tirzepatide failed endo results, that limit exceeded despite high purity.

                            vpepsV S 2 Replies Last reply
                            4
                            • RandyR Randy

                              @Stevepep

                              This is the endo and mass/purity from the illustrious JEEP/BARN T30 batch from january. These results woke a lot of people up.

                              https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/136052-Sterility2_A749RCAF7WEC

                              https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/105625-TR30_HCGBEYR4X5CV

                              pep_researcherP Offline
                              pep_researcherP Offline
                              pep_researcher
                              wrote last edited by
                              #55

                              @Randy said:

                              @Stevepep

                              This is the endo and mass/purity from the illustrious JEEP/BARN T30 batch from january. These results woke a lot of people up.

                              https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/136052-Sterility2_A749RCAF7WEC

                              https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/105625-TR30_HCGBEYR4X5CV

                              THIS!

                              Boy this is a long thread. I didn't realize but this is exactly what I was referring to in my previous reply. Endotoxins and purity are not related.

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                                @Stevepep said:

                                @ResearchCat the endotoxin testing is an interesting topic. According to the Jano guy with purity levels well over 90 pct it’s impossible for the toxins to be high enough not to pass so it’s unnecessary testing.

                                This is not true. Peter said endotoxin failures are rare, but not zero. He gave percentage failures in an interview. Endotoxins and purity have no correlation. A 99% pure product can still have high enough endotoxins.

                                The only nuance is endotoxin effect depends on research subject's weight and per dose endotoxin exposure. There's some limit you can find online.

                                Recently when JEEP Tirzepatide failed endo results, that limit exceeded despite high purity.

                                vpepsV Online
                                vpepsV Online
                                vpeps
                                wrote last edited by
                                #56

                                @pep_researcher finally someone says it. Thank you!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • J JtCjEfF

                                  @Stevepep I just watched a video on YT, from "PepTok" (Rory from Crush) and he interviews Trustpoint Analytical. Starting at about 7:30 he has the best explanation on the differences Ive heard yet. This, combined with several other comments about LPS from other well know podcasters, specifically Huberman, and Im starting to have a better understanding.
                                  Thought I would mention it here. Maybe it helps. I am not linking it here because my dumbass hasn't read all of the forum rules and I dont want to get in trouble.

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  SkepticJen
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #57

                                  @JtCjEfF Good interview - thanks for letting us know!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                                    @Randy said:

                                    @Stevepep

                                    This is the endo and mass/purity from the illustrious JEEP/BARN T30 batch from january. These results woke a lot of people up.

                                    https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/136052-Sterility2_A749RCAF7WEC

                                    https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/105625-TR30_HCGBEYR4X5CV

                                    THIS!

                                    Boy this is a long thread. I didn't realize but this is exactly what I was referring to in my previous reply. Endotoxins and purity are not related.

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Stevepep
                                    wrote last edited by Stevepep
                                    #58

                                    @pep_researcher I saw this @randy posted it. That put that to bed. It just shows you how much bad information is out there. Which leads to sterility. Wouldn't filtering remove any bacteria or fungi? Isn't that the purpose? According to YouTube University, it does. It also says the bacteria, fungi, and yeast can form during storage. Meaning, during the time it was tested, it will pass, but after storage (some of us have years of peptides), it can fail as the peptide degrades. Another reason not to hoard, I guess.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                                      @Stevepep said:

                                      @ResearchCat the endotoxin testing is an interesting topic. According to the Jano guy with purity levels well over 90 pct it’s impossible for the toxins to be high enough not to pass so it’s unnecessary testing.

                                      This is not true. Peter said endotoxin failures are rare, but not zero. He gave percentage failures in an interview. Endotoxins and purity have no correlation. A 99% pure product can still have high enough endotoxins.

                                      The only nuance is endotoxin effect depends on research subject's weight and per dose endotoxin exposure. There's some limit you can find online.

                                      Recently when JEEP Tirzepatide failed endo results, that limit exceeded despite high purity.

                                      S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Stevepep
                                      wrote last edited by Stevepep
                                      #59

                                      @pep_researcher Interesting, listened to the Trustpoint and then the Jano guy on Peptock. It was great; it appears endotoxin is worthless if you test for sterility. He said it's never happened where you have high endotoxins and it passes sterility. It's also extremely rare to have endotoxins at all, but like 5% don't pass sterility. Testing for heavy metals is totally useless. So dumb me, I have been doing endotoxin and HPLC testing. I should be doing HPLC and sterility. All these test groups and our own personal testing tell the story. Endoxins are extremely rare. I am aware of only one failure, and it was Jeep.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • RandyR Randy

                                        @Stevepep

                                        This is the endo and mass/purity from the illustrious JEEP/BARN T30 batch from january. These results woke a lot of people up.

                                        https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/136052-Sterility2_A749RCAF7WEC

                                        https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/105625-TR30_HCGBEYR4X5CV

                                        F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        flyhigh
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #60

                                        @Randy The eu limit is 5 EU/kg of body weight/hour so in theory safe to use up to about 4-5 mgs weekly dose.😁

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • RandyR Offline
                                          RandyR Offline
                                          Randy
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #61

                                          380ish EU... For a a 200lb that's 80% of the limit. Let's not forget there are endotoxins in bac. The number isn't also some magical spot where an issue gets triggered. Usually research subjects have issues long before that. You're also assuming that you're not stacking it with other active research chemicals that have endotoxins in them.

                                          Most aren't doing 5 mg.

                                          "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          4

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups