Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community

Peptide Critic Community

  1. Randy the Rats Research Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Nexaph 3rd Party Testing
Prize
Red, White & Blue V2 Pens
Ends in
8161 entries · 1000 participants
Enter →

Nexaph 3rd Party Testing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
glp2-tbeginner-questionlab-test
62 Posts 21 Posters 2.1k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Stevepep

    @ResearchCat the endotoxin testing is an interesting topic. According to the Jano guy with purity levels well over 90 pct it’s impossible for the toxins to be high enough not to pass so it’s unnecessary testing.

    pep_researcherP Offline
    pep_researcherP Offline
    pep_researcher
    wrote last edited by
    #53
    This post is deleted!
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stevepep

      @ResearchCat the endotoxin testing is an interesting topic. According to the Jano guy with purity levels well over 90 pct it’s impossible for the toxins to be high enough not to pass so it’s unnecessary testing.

      pep_researcherP Offline
      pep_researcherP Offline
      pep_researcher
      wrote last edited by pep_researcher
      #54

      @Stevepep said:

      @ResearchCat the endotoxin testing is an interesting topic. According to the Jano guy with purity levels well over 90 pct it’s impossible for the toxins to be high enough not to pass so it’s unnecessary testing.

      This is not true. Peter said endotoxin failures are rare, but not zero. He gave percentage failures in an interview. Endotoxins and purity have no correlation. A 99% pure product can still have high enough endotoxins.

      The only nuance is endotoxin effect depends on research subject's weight and per dose endotoxin exposure. There's some limit you can find online.

      Recently when JEEP Tirzepatide failed endo results, that limit exceeded despite high purity.

      vpeptidesV S 2 Replies Last reply
      4
      • RandyR Randy

        @Stevepep

        This is the endo and mass/purity from the illustrious JEEP/BARN T30 batch from january. These results woke a lot of people up.

        https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/136052-Sterility2_A749RCAF7WEC

        https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/105625-TR30_HCGBEYR4X5CV

        pep_researcherP Offline
        pep_researcherP Offline
        pep_researcher
        wrote last edited by
        #55

        @Randy said:

        @Stevepep

        This is the endo and mass/purity from the illustrious JEEP/BARN T30 batch from january. These results woke a lot of people up.

        https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/136052-Sterility2_A749RCAF7WEC

        https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/105625-TR30_HCGBEYR4X5CV

        THIS!

        Boy this is a long thread. I didn't realize but this is exactly what I was referring to in my previous reply. Endotoxins and purity are not related.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

          @Stevepep said:

          @ResearchCat the endotoxin testing is an interesting topic. According to the Jano guy with purity levels well over 90 pct it’s impossible for the toxins to be high enough not to pass so it’s unnecessary testing.

          This is not true. Peter said endotoxin failures are rare, but not zero. He gave percentage failures in an interview. Endotoxins and purity have no correlation. A 99% pure product can still have high enough endotoxins.

          The only nuance is endotoxin effect depends on research subject's weight and per dose endotoxin exposure. There's some limit you can find online.

          Recently when JEEP Tirzepatide failed endo results, that limit exceeded despite high purity.

          vpeptidesV Online
          vpeptidesV Online
          vpeptides
          wrote last edited by
          #56

          @pep_researcher finally someone says it. Thank you!

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • J JtCjEfF

            @Stevepep I just watched a video on YT, from "PepTok" (Rory from Crush) and he interviews Trustpoint Analytical. Starting at about 7:30 he has the best explanation on the differences Ive heard yet. This, combined with several other comments about LPS from other well know podcasters, specifically Huberman, and Im starting to have a better understanding.
            Thought I would mention it here. Maybe it helps. I am not linking it here because my dumbass hasn't read all of the forum rules and I dont want to get in trouble.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            SkepticJen
            wrote last edited by
            #57

            @JtCjEfF Good interview - thanks for letting us know!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

              @Randy said:

              @Stevepep

              This is the endo and mass/purity from the illustrious JEEP/BARN T30 batch from january. These results woke a lot of people up.

              https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/136052-Sterility2_A749RCAF7WEC

              https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/105625-TR30_HCGBEYR4X5CV

              THIS!

              Boy this is a long thread. I didn't realize but this is exactly what I was referring to in my previous reply. Endotoxins and purity are not related.

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stevepep
              wrote last edited by Stevepep
              #58

              @pep_researcher I saw this @randy posted it. That put that to bed. It just shows you how much bad information is out there. Which leads to sterility. Wouldn't filtering remove any bacteria or fungi? Isn't that the purpose? According to YouTube University, it does. It also says the bacteria, fungi, and yeast can form during storage. Meaning, during the time it was tested, it will pass, but after storage (some of us have years of peptides), it can fail as the peptide degrades. Another reason not to hoard, I guess.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                @Stevepep said:

                @ResearchCat the endotoxin testing is an interesting topic. According to the Jano guy with purity levels well over 90 pct it’s impossible for the toxins to be high enough not to pass so it’s unnecessary testing.

                This is not true. Peter said endotoxin failures are rare, but not zero. He gave percentage failures in an interview. Endotoxins and purity have no correlation. A 99% pure product can still have high enough endotoxins.

                The only nuance is endotoxin effect depends on research subject's weight and per dose endotoxin exposure. There's some limit you can find online.

                Recently when JEEP Tirzepatide failed endo results, that limit exceeded despite high purity.

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Stevepep
                wrote last edited by Stevepep
                #59

                @pep_researcher Interesting, listened to the Trustpoint and then the Jano guy on Peptock. It was great; it appears endotoxin is worthless if you test for sterility. He said it's never happened where you have high endotoxins and it passes sterility. It's also extremely rare to have endotoxins at all, but like 5% don't pass sterility. Testing for heavy metals is totally useless. So dumb me, I have been doing endotoxin and HPLC testing. I should be doing HPLC and sterility. All these test groups and our own personal testing tell the story. Endoxins are extremely rare. I am aware of only one failure, and it was Jeep.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • RandyR Randy

                  @Stevepep

                  This is the endo and mass/purity from the illustrious JEEP/BARN T30 batch from january. These results woke a lot of people up.

                  https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/136052-Sterility2_A749RCAF7WEC

                  https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/105625-TR30_HCGBEYR4X5CV

                  F Offline
                  F Offline
                  flyhigh
                  wrote last edited by
                  #60

                  @Randy The eu limit is 5 EU/kg of body weight/hour so in theory safe to use up to about 4-5 mgs weekly dose.😁

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • RandyR Online
                    RandyR Online
                    Randy
                    wrote last edited by
                    #61

                    380ish EU... For a a 200lb that's 80% of the limit. Let's not forget there are endotoxins in bac. The number isn't also some magical spot where an issue gets triggered. Usually research subjects have issues long before that. You're also assuming that you're not stacking it with other active research chemicals that have endotoxins in them.

                    Most aren't doing 5 mg.

                    "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    4
                    • RandyR Randy

                      @TheHazmatGuy

                      Janoshik is a lab with nice equipment. They do tests, They were caught taking a bribe from one of the largest resellers (the now defunct SSA) well over a year ago now.

                      Nexaph does the bare minimum on testing but its a lot more than "Tess" on whatsapp. It's a great starting point. Especially considering their domestic pricing. They have had sterility failures. Most recently their t30 christmas batch failed at jano then trustpoint was sent a ton of vials and identified the culprit.

                      FRIGGIN' STAPH

                      1774112654067.webp

                      This is all public knowledge but bring it up in their TG and pitchforks come out. I dont like the tribalism in any of these communities. Its about the researcher in the end. Not who you buy from.

                      I still buy from nexaph. But this is why we filter.

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      jenmarca
                      wrote last edited by
                      #62

                      @Randy I am about to buy some filters for the first time ever. Your filter videos are super helpful!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1

                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                      Register Login
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups