New to Peptide Critic - Not to Peptides and Bioregulators
-
@bfuller PSI is pretty new to the space I assume. They don't seem to have much of a following yet. I like their stuff.
@Shaqdiesel I like them too because they bring up a lot of random and hard-to-find (but also hard-to-check) information, and also they are amusing. Brenden Henry is some kind of a savant, getting really deep into the subject, but he lacks some, I guess, education, to integrate it, to understand things like the mechanical studies don't always translate to evidence-based effects in humans, or that if a compound affects some complexes and pathways in-vitro, and those pathways are known to promote some kind effect, it doesn't mean those compounds will also necessarily have that effect. Their business looks so messed, their website design is ridiculous, looking like some scammers from 1990s selling magic pills. I got their book, it is printed in a large text and maybe 60% of its text is a copy/paste of the same paragraphs over and over, looking more like somebody's notes piled together without a proper editing. Also, it doesn't have any references, and they offer you to buy the references separately for over $1000
With the book they gave me a bunch of "bonuses" of mostly useless, questionable and even ridiculous information too.
They also have a doctor on the team who studies in Russia and sits somewhere in Republic of Georgia, acting like a kind of House M.D. and looking like he is always under some influence (actually drinking wine and vaping on the videos). It's a nice show and fun to watch, they pull interesting ideas and protocols, but I noticed a lot of mistakes and misleading information, way too much for "The Global Scientific Authority on Peptide Research" and "the world's biggest & most scientifically backed book on peptides ever written"
At the same time they are the best so far on the bioregulators, simply because the rest are even worse. -
@Shaqdiesel I like them too because they bring up a lot of random and hard-to-find (but also hard-to-check) information, and also they are amusing. Brenden Henry is some kind of a savant, getting really deep into the subject, but he lacks some, I guess, education, to integrate it, to understand things like the mechanical studies don't always translate to evidence-based effects in humans, or that if a compound affects some complexes and pathways in-vitro, and those pathways are known to promote some kind effect, it doesn't mean those compounds will also necessarily have that effect. Their business looks so messed, their website design is ridiculous, looking like some scammers from 1990s selling magic pills. I got their book, it is printed in a large text and maybe 60% of its text is a copy/paste of the same paragraphs over and over, looking more like somebody's notes piled together without a proper editing. Also, it doesn't have any references, and they offer you to buy the references separately for over $1000
With the book they gave me a bunch of "bonuses" of mostly useless, questionable and even ridiculous information too.
They also have a doctor on the team who studies in Russia and sits somewhere in Republic of Georgia, acting like a kind of House M.D. and looking like he is always under some influence (actually drinking wine and vaping on the videos). It's a nice show and fun to watch, they pull interesting ideas and protocols, but I noticed a lot of mistakes and misleading information, way too much for "The Global Scientific Authority on Peptide Research" and "the world's biggest & most scientifically backed book on peptides ever written"
At the same time they are the best so far on the bioregulators, simply because the rest are even worse.@vpeptides Great summary.
-
@Shaqdiesel I like them too because they bring up a lot of random and hard-to-find (but also hard-to-check) information, and also they are amusing. Brenden Henry is some kind of a savant, getting really deep into the subject, but he lacks some, I guess, education, to integrate it, to understand things like the mechanical studies don't always translate to evidence-based effects in humans, or that if a compound affects some complexes and pathways in-vitro, and those pathways are known to promote some kind effect, it doesn't mean those compounds will also necessarily have that effect. Their business looks so messed, their website design is ridiculous, looking like some scammers from 1990s selling magic pills. I got their book, it is printed in a large text and maybe 60% of its text is a copy/paste of the same paragraphs over and over, looking more like somebody's notes piled together without a proper editing. Also, it doesn't have any references, and they offer you to buy the references separately for over $1000
With the book they gave me a bunch of "bonuses" of mostly useless, questionable and even ridiculous information too.
They also have a doctor on the team who studies in Russia and sits somewhere in Republic of Georgia, acting like a kind of House M.D. and looking like he is always under some influence (actually drinking wine and vaping on the videos). It's a nice show and fun to watch, they pull interesting ideas and protocols, but I noticed a lot of mistakes and misleading information, way too much for "The Global Scientific Authority on Peptide Research" and "the world's biggest & most scientifically backed book on peptides ever written"
At the same time they are the best so far on the bioregulators, simply because the rest are even worse.@vpeptides Hey question for you. I've always done bio regs for 10-20 days for example minus cartalax.
I've heard PSI recomend pinealon subq @ 1 mg for 6 months with a plethora of other things to a lady who was suffereing from fatigue and brain fog in her mid 60's.
Do you know what the dosing protocols looked like for the Athletic studies they reference? Is it in the book? Brendan always says he reads all the comments and responds to everyone, but he hasn't responded to me when I asked what an athletic protocol would look like.
-
@vpeptides Hey question for you. I've always done bio regs for 10-20 days for example minus cartalax.
I've heard PSI recomend pinealon subq @ 1 mg for 6 months with a plethora of other things to a lady who was suffereing from fatigue and brain fog in her mid 60's.
Do you know what the dosing protocols looked like for the Athletic studies they reference? Is it in the book? Brendan always says he reads all the comments and responds to everyone, but he hasn't responded to me when I asked what an athletic protocol would look like.
@bfuller I left many comments there I don't recall he ever responded to any. The study referenced in the book was in rats
Increased the maximum treadmill run time in rats by 254% within 10 days. This was at a dosage of 75mcg/kg, which in mice converts to 150mcg/kg and humans. I don't know whether mice and rats to human conversion is the same in this case.It is 12mg then for 80kg person. (see correction below) -
@bfuller I left many comments there I don't recall he ever responded to any. The study referenced in the book was in rats
Increased the maximum treadmill run time in rats by 254% within 10 days. This was at a dosage of 75mcg/kg, which in mice converts to 150mcg/kg and humans. I don't know whether mice and rats to human conversion is the same in this case.It is 12mg then for 80kg person. (see correction below)@vpeptides This is how I know big Tech is spying on us. This video popped up in my feed while I was doing cardio today. Coincedence, maybe but this happens way too often. It was really god though, I had seen the whole interview previously, he actually talks about the human study in athletes and taking it in the AM and pre HIIT workouts etc.
How Pinealon Might Improve Sleep & Cognitive Function | Dr. Abud Bakri & Dr. Andrew Huberman -
@vpeptides This is how I know big Tech is spying on us. This video popped up in my feed while I was doing cardio today. Coincedence, maybe but this happens way too often. It was really god though, I had seen the whole interview previously, he actually talks about the human study in athletes and taking it in the AM and pre HIIT workouts etc.
How Pinealon Might Improve Sleep & Cognitive Function | Dr. Abud Bakri & Dr. Andrew Huberman -
@vpeptides Great summary.
Here is a good one of Optimal Nathan on the DDT Podcast. I'm geting more interested in doing some of Optimal Nathans classes on Bioregulators the more I listen to his podcasts and interviews.
The Complete Bioregulator Masterclass -
@vpeptides This is how I know big Tech is spying on us. This video popped up in my feed while I was doing cardio today. Coincedence, maybe but this happens way too often. It was really god though, I had seen the whole interview previously, he actually talks about the human study in athletes and taking it in the AM and pre HIIT workouts etc.
How Pinealon Might Improve Sleep & Cognitive Function | Dr. Abud Bakri & Dr. Andrew Huberman@bfuller I watched it before. Here is one for you.
What's weird, in the book, the quote I posted above, literally, is definitely taken from this video and it is cut in the middle of the sentenceand humans... so I thought 150mcg/kg is in humans, but it is in mice, but in video he continues (at 13:38 and 22:25)and in humans approximately 851 mcg for 70kg human. I tell you this book is half-baked.
-
@bfuller I watched it before. Here is one for you.
What's weird, in the book, the quote I posted above, literally, is definitely taken from this video and it is cut in the middle of the sentenceand humans... so I thought 150mcg/kg is in humans, but it is in mice, but in video he continues (at 13:38 and 22:25)and in humans approximately 851 mcg for 70kg human. I tell you this book is half-baked.@vpeptides Thoughts on what a dosing protocol for testagen/prostomax/vesilute/ vesugen sub q injectibles would be good, I see recomedations all over the place. Theres a 50% off sale on BLL - I want to see if taking this stack will stop my 3:00 am wake up to pee and boost lift my test at the same time
I'm thinking 1-2 mg of each for 10-20 days like most of the synthestic Bio regulatorrs yeah, does the book have any tips on those.
-
@vpeptides Thoughts on what a dosing protocol for testagen/prostomax/vesilute/ vesugen sub q injectibles would be good, I see recomedations all over the place. Theres a 50% off sale on BLL - I want to see if taking this stack will stop my 3:00 am wake up to pee and boost lift my test at the same time
I'm thinking 1-2 mg of each for 10-20 days like most of the synthestic Bio regulatorrs yeah, does the book have any tips on those.
@bfuller It looks like a good combo. 1 mg also sounds reasonable. Vesilute is the least researched but also it's a dipeptide and a base of many other bioregulators, so it's fine. In my notes I have: "Use (Vesilute) 15 minutes after Vesugen for vessel blood circulation". I think a good idea is to inject all of them with some pauses in between.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login