Flawless Compounds User Review: Flawless customer service
-
This is a vendor review submitted by MCMAC3998 on PeptideCritic.com.
Rating:
(5/5)
Review
Good selection and prices with several discounts available. COA's readily available and easy to confirm. Post purchase customer service was the best I've encountered in 2 years of doing business with several other companies. I ordered on a Saturday and received them by Monday. I was kept updated by Flawless and FedEx daily. I don't think I ever received my peptides in 2 days no matter what day I purchased them. Most of the time the average I wait for my deliveries from other companies is 5-7 days. They're on it. Flawless service.
Read the full review: Flawless customer serviceDiscuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor.
Please keep discussions respectful and factual.
-
This is a vendor review submitted by MCMAC3998 on PeptideCritic.com.
Rating:
(5/5)
Review
Good selection and prices with several discounts available. COA's readily available and easy to confirm. Post purchase customer service was the best I've encountered in 2 years of doing business with several other companies. I ordered on a Saturday and received them by Monday. I was kept updated by Flawless and FedEx daily. I don't think I ever received my peptides in 2 days no matter what day I purchased them. Most of the time the average I wait for my deliveries from other companies is 5-7 days. They're on it. Flawless service.
Read the full review: Flawless customer serviceDiscuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor.
Please keep discussions respectful and factual.
@MCMAC3998 I'n curious what did you get and keep us posted on your experience with the products, I'm slowly going through their product line an interested in what other users are experienceing.
So far I can let you know the GHK and BPC are fantastic and the MOTS-C is one off the best I've researched. Second best actually but the first best was purelife peptides that got shut down so Flawless are technically in first spot. ISR is minimal, just a little pink for an hour or two then gone and output and endurance through the roof. I am trying Atomiks to compare I've hear theres is good too.
-
@MCMAC3998 I'n curious what did you get and keep us posted on your experience with the products, I'm slowly going through their product line an interested in what other users are experienceing.
So far I can let you know the GHK and BPC are fantastic and the MOTS-C is one off the best I've researched. Second best actually but the first best was purelife peptides that got shut down so Flawless are technically in first spot. ISR is minimal, just a little pink for an hour or two then gone and output and endurance through the roof. I am trying Atomiks to compare I've hear theres is good too.
@bfuller curious how do you know this so much of what I do is subjective. I get blood work every month to verify but still I cant say this is the best etc. for instance how the heck do you know GHK-CU or BPC 157 from flawless is the best based on what?
-
@bfuller curious how do you know this so much of what I do is subjective. I get blood work every month to verify but still I cant say this is the best etc. for instance how the heck do you know GHK-CU or BPC 157 from flawless is the best based on what?
@Stevepep I said the MOTS-C was the best and I am comparing my years of Garmin and Zwift data from my wahoo kicker smart trainer. Every dose I have hoped on the trainer I am getting PR's or second best times mostly within 10's of seconds of my best times and relative effort and HR are slighly lower for the same power outputs on the same courses. So that is objective as far as I'm concerned becasue I have done the same with other brands and the results haven't been the same, except for one brand that is no longer around. And it hasn't been just one ride its been several so far. Subjectively I feel awsome after the ride too like I could climb K2 but thats not really a data point, objectively my RHR and HRV and sleep scores are all going in the right direction for 48 hours after I dose too and recovery has been solid.
I said the BPC and GHK was fantastic (not the best) so far becasue I had inflamation in my knee and an irritated miniscus. It appears the peptides have pushed me through the stall in recovery and it is starting to improve and get better I had issues walking more than 2 KM or even sitting or driving. Now no issues walking more than 5 km and the aches are dissipating and not as stong and my joint isn't as stiff from sitting for longer periods of time- I had been going to physio and massage for 3 months and recovery stalled. I stopped going but kept the stretching and rolling routine going and added the peptides. Also with my high output rides my knee is fine and I don't suffer sharp pains in the knee during the ride or dull aches after especially laying down at night. So that is probably more subjective becasue I have no data other than I can tell you Ijust did a 5 hour drive and it was 100x less painful than the 2.5 hour drive I did a month before I took the BPC-GHK from flawless, stacked with TB-500 from a different lab. I'll find out whats wrong with my knee Tuesday, I have an MSK ultra sound and X-ray. Could be osteoarthritis, what ever it is it sucked really bad for the last few months. Therfore the BPC and GHK is probably more of a N of 1 subjective with personal feeling of relative pain scores and functiionality vs the MOTS I have the baslines and measurable performance metrics recorded to compare against.
The other crazy thing is I'm getting the numbers I'm getting and my knee isn't even 100%
-
@Stevepep I said the MOTS-C was the best and I am comparing my years of Garmin and Zwift data from my wahoo kicker smart trainer. Every dose I have hoped on the trainer I am getting PR's or second best times mostly within 10's of seconds of my best times and relative effort and HR are slighly lower for the same power outputs on the same courses. So that is objective as far as I'm concerned becasue I have done the same with other brands and the results haven't been the same, except for one brand that is no longer around. And it hasn't been just one ride its been several so far. Subjectively I feel awsome after the ride too like I could climb K2 but thats not really a data point, objectively my RHR and HRV and sleep scores are all going in the right direction for 48 hours after I dose too and recovery has been solid.
I said the BPC and GHK was fantastic (not the best) so far becasue I had inflamation in my knee and an irritated miniscus. It appears the peptides have pushed me through the stall in recovery and it is starting to improve and get better I had issues walking more than 2 KM or even sitting or driving. Now no issues walking more than 5 km and the aches are dissipating and not as stong and my joint isn't as stiff from sitting for longer periods of time- I had been going to physio and massage for 3 months and recovery stalled. I stopped going but kept the stretching and rolling routine going and added the peptides. Also with my high output rides my knee is fine and I don't suffer sharp pains in the knee during the ride or dull aches after especially laying down at night. So that is probably more subjective becasue I have no data other than I can tell you Ijust did a 5 hour drive and it was 100x less painful than the 2.5 hour drive I did a month before I took the BPC-GHK from flawless, stacked with TB-500 from a different lab. I'll find out whats wrong with my knee Tuesday, I have an MSK ultra sound and X-ray. Could be osteoarthritis, what ever it is it sucked really bad for the last few months. Therfore the BPC and GHK is probably more of a N of 1 subjective with personal feeling of relative pain scores and functiionality vs the MOTS I have the baslines and measurable performance metrics recorded to compare against.
The other crazy thing is I'm getting the numbers I'm getting and my knee isn't even 100%
@bfuller I get it I track everything, blood work, dexa, mile times, but it’s still subjective to say one is better than the other. I am about to start mots-c so maybe I may be wrong. Currently I am running a 6:47 mile and running 4 miles 3-4 times a week plus cross training and heavy lifting. Boxing 1-2 times per month. My fitness has peaked for sure and I am a fan of Nexaph but I can’t say my Nexaph stuff is better than my mile high stuff or glacier stuff I just have no way of quantifying that. I do know the testing at Nexaph is top notch because it Janoshik. To me it’s impossible to say my ghk-cu from c is better than from y. I am not that much of a fanboy
-
@Stevepep I said the MOTS-C was the best and I am comparing my years of Garmin and Zwift data from my wahoo kicker smart trainer. Every dose I have hoped on the trainer I am getting PR's or second best times mostly within 10's of seconds of my best times and relative effort and HR are slighly lower for the same power outputs on the same courses. So that is objective as far as I'm concerned becasue I have done the same with other brands and the results haven't been the same, except for one brand that is no longer around. And it hasn't been just one ride its been several so far. Subjectively I feel awsome after the ride too like I could climb K2 but thats not really a data point, objectively my RHR and HRV and sleep scores are all going in the right direction for 48 hours after I dose too and recovery has been solid.
I said the BPC and GHK was fantastic (not the best) so far becasue I had inflamation in my knee and an irritated miniscus. It appears the peptides have pushed me through the stall in recovery and it is starting to improve and get better I had issues walking more than 2 KM or even sitting or driving. Now no issues walking more than 5 km and the aches are dissipating and not as stong and my joint isn't as stiff from sitting for longer periods of time- I had been going to physio and massage for 3 months and recovery stalled. I stopped going but kept the stretching and rolling routine going and added the peptides. Also with my high output rides my knee is fine and I don't suffer sharp pains in the knee during the ride or dull aches after especially laying down at night. So that is probably more subjective becasue I have no data other than I can tell you Ijust did a 5 hour drive and it was 100x less painful than the 2.5 hour drive I did a month before I took the BPC-GHK from flawless, stacked with TB-500 from a different lab. I'll find out whats wrong with my knee Tuesday, I have an MSK ultra sound and X-ray. Could be osteoarthritis, what ever it is it sucked really bad for the last few months. Therfore the BPC and GHK is probably more of a N of 1 subjective with personal feeling of relative pain scores and functiionality vs the MOTS I have the baslines and measurable performance metrics recorded to compare against.
The other crazy thing is I'm getting the numbers I'm getting and my knee isn't even 100%
@Stevepep I said the MOTS-C was the best and I am comparing my years of Garmin and Zwift data from my wahoo kicker smart trainer. Every dose I have hoped on the trainer I am getting PR's or second best times mostly within 10's of seconds of my best times and relative effort and HR are slighly lower for the same power outputs on the same courses. So that is objective as far as I'm concerned becasue I have done the same with other brands and the results haven't been the same, except for one brand that is no longer around. And it hasn't been just one ride its been several so far. Subjectively I feel awsome after the ride too like I could climb K2 but thats not really a data point, objectively my RHR and HRV and sleep scores are all going in the right direction for 48 hours after I dose too and recovery has been solid.
I said the BPC and GHK was fantastic (not the best) so far becasue I had inflamation in my knee and a irritated miniscus that it appears the peptides hasve pushed me through the stall in recovery and it is starting to improve and get better I had issues walking more than 2 KM or even sitting or driving. Now no issues walking more than 5 km and the aches are dissipating and not as stong and my joint isn't as stiff from sitting for longer periods of time- I had been going to physio and massage for 3 months and recovery stalled. I stopped going but kept the stretching and rolling routine going and added the peptides. Also with my high output rides my knee is fine and I don't suffer sharp pains in the knee during the ride or dull aches after especially laying down at night. So that is probably more subjective becasue I have no data other than I can tell you Ijust did a 5 hour drive and it was 100x less painful than the 2.5 hour drive I did before a month before I took the BPC-GHK from flawless, stacked with TB-500 from a different lab. I'll find out whats wrong with my knee Tuesday, I have an MSK ultra sound and X-ray. Could be osteoarthritis, what ever it is it sucked really bad for the last few months. Therfore the BPC and GHK is probably more of a N of 1 subjective with personal feeling of relative pain scores and functiionality vs the MOTS I have the baslines and measurable performance metrics recorded to compare against.
The other crazy thing is I'm getting the numbers I'm getting and my knee isn't even 100%
Nice retort.
-
@bfuller I get it I track everything, blood work, dexa, mile times, but it’s still subjective to say one is better than the other. I am about to start mots-c so maybe I may be wrong. Currently I am running a 6:47 mile and running 4 miles 3-4 times a week plus cross training and heavy lifting. Boxing 1-2 times per month. My fitness has peaked for sure and I am a fan of Nexaph but I can’t say my Nexaph stuff is better than my mile high stuff or glacier stuff I just have no way of quantifying that. I do know the testing at Nexaph is top notch because it Janoshik. To me it’s impossible to say my ghk-cu from c is better than from y. I am not that much of a fanboy
@Stevepep Fair enough, your personality is more reserved precise and skeptical and mine is outgoing and optomistic. Together we couold become the Siskel and Ebert of peptide reviews if we started YouTube channel eh?!
I've heard Nexaph is solid, I actually reached out to them first based on Randy Uncle Wang Brand and the comments on the site but they don't ship to Canada unfotunately, its sounds like we would give Nexaph two thumbs up if we reviewed them on our show though.
-
I agree - they have been Flawless with me. Just placed 2 orders this week. Already received one and get the one I placed today on Monday! Product/service/info/packaging has been second to none.
-
@Stevepep Fair enough, your personality is more reserved precise and skeptical and mine is outgoing and optomistic. Together we couold become the Siskel and Ebert of peptide reviews if we started YouTube channel eh?!
I've heard Nexaph is solid, I actually reached out to them first based on Randy Uncle Wang Brand and the comments on the site but they don't ship to Canada unfotunately, its sounds like we would give Nexaph two thumbs up if we reviewed them on our show though.
-
@Stevepep Fair enough, your personality is more reserved precise and skeptical and mine is outgoing and optomistic. Together we couold become the Siskel and Ebert of peptide reviews if we started YouTube channel eh?!
I've heard Nexaph is solid, I actually reached out to them first based on Randy Uncle Wang Brand and the comments on the site but they don't ship to Canada unfotunately, its sounds like we would give Nexaph two thumbs up if we reviewed them on our show though.
@bfuller IMO - you're much better off with Flawless Compounds - love buying from them! From my experience (which is documented in various places on this forum), NEXAPH gets a BIG thumbs down from me (among other fingers I could use).
-
Not so flawless. Their Tesamorelin for example. Current batch 10mg FL-010221. Listed as Purity 99.71%, open COA next to this claim: Purity 97.95%. Oops.
@vpeptides below 98 ouch. This is really a bad look and extremely shady to show something different than the testing. This and the fact they had to be shamed into giving a refund for bad product is enough for me to say no thanks.
-
@MCMAC3998 I'n curious what did you get and keep us posted on your experience with the products, I'm slowly going through their product line an interested in what other users are experienceing.
So far I can let you know the GHK and BPC are fantastic and the MOTS-C is one off the best I've researched. Second best actually but the first best was purelife peptides that got shut down so Flawless are technically in first spot. ISR is minimal, just a little pink for an hour or two then gone and output and endurance through the roof. I am trying Atomiks to compare I've hear theres is good too.
@bfuller I bought Cerebrolysin. I don't think I'm qualified to speak to anything except for how it works for me personally. I have tried Semax, Selank, and Pinealon from other companies which had no effect on me. I'm hopeful this works. I'll keep you posted.
-
They definitely have a fast turnaround, I’ve ordered from flawless multiple times. Placed an order early Saturday morning for TB, with their sale still running and the coupon code the kit price was less than nexaph which is hard to beat.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login