Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Nexaph reliability?
Prize
Three Pens + Filters & Cartridges
Ends in
11973 entries · 4904 participants
Enter →

Nexaph reliability?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
66 Posts 25 Posters 5.5k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • RandyR Randy

    I think he's referring to the MZ biolabs one he posted in another thread. Honestly there is a reason nobody really uses MZ except a few boomer companies. I've seen them show 30% +/- fills on things that are later debunked by another lab. Point being they have a record of flubbing the numbers.

    Could the test be accurate? Yes. Is there a chance their standard is off or someone made an oopsie with your sample? Yes.

    Send a vial to AFI, Trustpointe, Vanguard, Jano or Kovera (pains me to say it)

    R Offline
    R Offline
    ReallyRandy
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    @Randy Thank you

    atlas01A 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • atlas01A atlas01

      Your test came from a sketchy lab nobody’s heard of. Nexaph is very transparent with their testing, and many people (including myself) participate in group tests to validate their claims.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      ReallyRandy
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @atlas01 are you talking about US nexaph? I didn't know there were two. I wqs chatting with Nexaph overseas I guess. They had no record of it.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R ReallyRandy

        @Randy Thank you

        atlas01A Offline
        atlas01A Offline
        atlas01
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        @ReallyRandy Every post you’ve made on here is an attempt to find dirt on Nexaph

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • atlas01A atlas01

          @ReallyRandy Every post you’ve made on here is an attempt to find dirt on Nexaph

          R Offline
          R Offline
          ReallyRandy
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @atlas01 Not really. I love their products and prices. I just don't want to throw my money away. I got on Telegram and thought I was chatting with the people who I ordered from. They said they have nothing to do with US Nexaph. I didn't know there were two. Do you know which one you order from? I'm looking for help. Thank you.

          S S B 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • R ReallyRandy

            @atlas01 Not really. I love their products and prices. I just don't want to throw my money away. I got on Telegram and thought I was chatting with the people who I ordered from. They said they have nothing to do with US Nexaph. I didn't know there were two. Do you know which one you order from? I'm looking for help. Thank you.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Shaqdiesel
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            @ReallyRandy As far as I know there is only 1 Nexaph. Maybe you got the wrong TG channel?

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • RandyR Randy

              I think he's referring to the MZ biolabs one he posted in another thread. Honestly there is a reason nobody really uses MZ except a few boomer companies. I've seen them show 30% +/- fills on things that are later debunked by another lab. Point being they have a record of flubbing the numbers.

              Could the test be accurate? Yes. Is there a chance their standard is off or someone made an oopsie with your sample? Yes.

              Send a vial to AFI, Trustpointe, Vanguard, Jano or Kovera (pains me to say it)

              E Offline
              E Offline
              e_kantor2
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @Randy you have trust behind kovera results?

              RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • R ReallyRandy

                @atlas01 Not really. I love their products and prices. I just don't want to throw my money away. I got on Telegram and thought I was chatting with the people who I ordered from. They said they have nothing to do with US Nexaph. I didn't know there were two. Do you know which one you order from? I'm looking for help. Thank you.

                S Online
                S Online
                Stevepep
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @ReallyRandy Cain is on SNP on Telegram; that is their official channel. There is only one. He reponds their frequently. You can also email him through the website and he is very responsive.

                R 2 Replies Last reply
                4
                • S Stevepep

                  @ReallyRandy Cain is on SNP on Telegram; that is their official channel. There is only one. He reponds their frequently. You can also email him through the website and he is very responsive.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  ReallyRandy
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @Stevepep thanks

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • E e_kantor2

                    @Randy you have trust behind kovera results?

                    RandyR Offline
                    RandyR Offline
                    Randy
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @e_kantor2 They test what they are sent and they report back what appear to be accurate results. Since the nonsense with the owner I have had multiple community members send samples in (mislabeled or properly labeled) since I wanted to be sure.

                    I'm sure...but I personally wont use them.

                    "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                    pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
                    6
                    • S Stevepep

                      @ReallyRandy Cain is on SNP on Telegram; that is their official channel. There is only one. He reponds their frequently. You can also email him through the website and he is very responsive.

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      ReallyRandy
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @Stevepep Thanks. I wqs on the wrong Chanel. Cain sent me the link. Now I'm on the correct one. Thank you.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • S Shaqdiesel

                        @ReallyRandy As far as I know there is only 1 Nexaph. Maybe you got the wrong TG channel?

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        ReallyRandy
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        @Shaqdiesel You were correct. Thank you

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Steve
                          wrote last edited by
                          #17

                          I’ve had a few orders from them and all have been verified with 3rd party testing. I can’t remember all of the vendors used but they ran from Freedom to Vanguard and Jano so I’m happy with that. There’s a strong 3rd party testing community for them which is not the case with most.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • RandyR Randy

                            @e_kantor2 They test what they are sent and they report back what appear to be accurate results. Since the nonsense with the owner I have had multiple community members send samples in (mislabeled or properly labeled) since I wanted to be sure.

                            I'm sure...but I personally wont use them.

                            pep_researcherP Offline
                            pep_researcherP Offline
                            pep_researcher
                            wrote last edited by
                            #18

                            @Randy After the back to back ILS glitches, now I'm skeptical to buy/use any products with their COAs. I've a few vials with ILS COAs in my stash.

                            What do you think?

                            vpepsV 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                              @Randy After the back to back ILS glitches, now I'm skeptical to buy/use any products with their COAs. I've a few vials with ILS COAs in my stash.

                              What do you think?

                              vpepsV Online
                              vpepsV Online
                              vpeps
                              wrote last edited by
                              #19

                              Did anybody get Nexaph's Tesamorelin? Is it a good quality one? They have no ready COA for the one they sell now.

                              Also, I wouldn't be so alarmed about 100% purity. Tools have an error margin. It is usually both ways: +-, like +-0.005%. If your measured value is 100.000% +-0.005%, it means it can be 99.995% - 100.000% (obviously it can't be over 100%). I take it this way.

                              attentiion is all you need

                              D C 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • P Offline
                                P Offline
                                PeptideEd
                                wrote last edited by PeptideEd
                                #20

                                @vpeptides I have used Nexaph Tesamorelin in the past (in fact, I just recently got more from them). Now all batches I both received and used had COAs that fell within my comfort zone. That said, I have purchased things in the past from Nexaph that did not have COAs at the time they arrived. I simply waited (approximately a week I believe) for the COAs to catch up before deciding whether to use them or not. YMMV.

                                Oh... and one other matter. Since Nexaph sends all of their testing to Janoshik, and Janoshik does not provide purity for 5-amino-1mq, I have sent the 5-amino-1mq I purchased from Nexaph out for testing to a different lab. Always came back golden.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • R ReallyRandy

                                  @atlas01 Not really. I love their products and prices. I just don't want to throw my money away. I got on Telegram and thought I was chatting with the people who I ordered from. They said they have nothing to do with US Nexaph. I didn't know there were two. Do you know which one you order from? I'm looking for help. Thank you.

                                  B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  BigPapi
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #21

                                  @reallyrandy I was in the wrong nexaph telegram for awhile. If you bought directly from that group you likely got scammed. Nexaph has a telegram but does not sell anything

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • vpepsV vpeps

                                    Did anybody get Nexaph's Tesamorelin? Is it a good quality one? They have no ready COA for the one they sell now.

                                    Also, I wouldn't be so alarmed about 100% purity. Tools have an error margin. It is usually both ways: +-, like +-0.005%. If your measured value is 100.000% +-0.005%, it means it can be 99.995% - 100.000% (obviously it can't be over 100%). I take it this way.

                                    D Offline
                                    D Offline
                                    derekg1
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #22

                                    @vpeptides said:

                                    Did anybody get Nexaph's Tesamorelin? Is it a good quality one? They have no ready COA for the one they sell now.

                                    Also, I wouldn't be so alarmed about 100% purity. Tools have an error margin. It is usually both ways: +-, like +-0.005%. If your measured value is 100.000% +-0.005%, it means it can be 99.995% - 100.000% (obviously it can't be over 100%). I take it this way.

                                    Testing their tesa/ipa blend now. It’s doing well for my little rat.

                                    N 1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • ResearchCatR Online
                                      ResearchCatR Online
                                      ResearchCat
                                      wrote last edited by ResearchCat
                                      #23

                                      I have researched Nexaph Tesa. Been happy with it. Except the swelling and joint aches, which in retrospect probably means dosage was too high.

                                      Edit: IIRC, i had to delay researching it for a month or two as the testing was in process, but they had 3 different batches in the testing pipeline, so it maybe just took a while. Makes sense if you bought it right when it was in stock.

                                      Yeah, well, I’m just here for the research, man. - The Dude

                                      If I haven’t liked your post, no offense. I have exceeded my daily allowance.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • vpepsV vpeps

                                        Did anybody get Nexaph's Tesamorelin? Is it a good quality one? They have no ready COA for the one they sell now.

                                        Also, I wouldn't be so alarmed about 100% purity. Tools have an error margin. It is usually both ways: +-, like +-0.005%. If your measured value is 100.000% +-0.005%, it means it can be 99.995% - 100.000% (obviously it can't be over 100%). I take it this way.

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        coondogesq
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #24

                                        @vpeptides I bought some of this Tesamorelin batch a couple of weeks ago. I reached out as to status and they expected the COA last week. Obviously it still hasn’t been posted. I’ll give it another week before I start asking again (as I don’t need it yet)

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • RandyR Randy

                                          I think he's referring to the MZ biolabs one he posted in another thread. Honestly there is a reason nobody really uses MZ except a few boomer companies. I've seen them show 30% +/- fills on things that are later debunked by another lab. Point being they have a record of flubbing the numbers.

                                          Could the test be accurate? Yes. Is there a chance their standard is off or someone made an oopsie with your sample? Yes.

                                          Send a vial to AFI, Trustpointe, Vanguard, Jano or Kovera (pains me to say it)

                                          M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          mary
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #25

                                          @Randy

                                          Gasp! I was just about to try MZ because I thought it'd be faster than Vanguard. I'm really impressed with what I have seen from Vanguard. So, thanks for the redirect...and all of the other golden comments you have posted!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups