StudzPeptides wants to upgrade testing
-
I hear you, @stevepep
When we first joined this site, nearly every lab we used drew criticism. We moved to Freedom, and apart from some members here on Peptide Critic, the feedback has been very positive. We’re still a young company and still going through growing pains, but we stand behind the quality of what we ship.
Every lab makes mistakes, and that includes Freedom and Vanguard. I noticed you were asking about Vanguard’s issues in another thread too. Hundreds of peptide companies use Freedom, which suggests they’re getting a lot right. Their customer service and response times have also been excellent, which hasn’t been our experience with Vanguard.
That doesn’t mean we’ll stay with Freedom forever. If the data tells us to switch, we will. I am not trying to convince you guys of anything, just being honest with what we are doing and why, and all it is met with is harsh criticism, at the end of the day, every lab is only as good as the trust any individual researcher has in it, I will look into places like trustpoint, but Vanguard has made it horrible in every fashion to work with
We have had only 4 tests every fail with Vanguard, we sent 2/4 of those items to freedom to compare, yet you guys also push aside the fact those results were also within 3% variance from lab to lab
That being said, we are ALWAYS trying to improve, I will leave it at that on my end whether or not you want to believe that I respect your decision and opinion
@StudzPeptides ask Cain at Nexaph about Freedom and they are the standard. First off you used a lab no one has ever heard of and you were criticized for that. First corner cut and I should have read the tea leaves then. I do wish Freedom and ILS would get their act together and trust me there is more about to come out on this. It’s your business if you want to use subpar testing that’s on you and people can decide what they want to do. Some people won’t know or care but that market is declining. There is one who posts on here all the time if you want to go by his input I wish you the best of luck. The competition is growing people have lots of options if you think just being the cheapest gets you there someone else will just be cheaper. It becomes a race to the bottom and it’s bad business IMO. You keep talking about margins which is code word for “we have to cut corners” It just takes one person getting sick because of a BS sterility test or endotoxin test and you are under water. There are many companies over the years whose obituaries were written based on these tactics
-
Well, I understand Quality Assurance and Quality Control as well as the next guy, probably better. I was QA Officer at two different Navy Nuclear Submarine repair facilities, and QA Director at the Navy Seal Headquarters. I’ve seen piss poor repair activities get hammered, then turn around into one of our best. I’ve also seen top activities get complacent and fall down to substandard performance. I’m not talking about over years, I’m talking about year to year. I assume if it can happen there it can happen with Testing Labs just as easily.
So piss poor six months to a year ago, and systematic improvement over that year to a top performer. It happens all the time. -
Well, I understand Quality Assurance and Quality Control as well as the next guy, probably better. I was QA Officer at two different Navy Nuclear Submarine repair facilities, and QA Director at the Navy Seal Headquarters. I’ve seen piss poor repair activities get hammered, then turn around into one of our best. I’ve also seen top activities get complacent and fall down to substandard performance. I’m not talking about over years, I’m talking about year to year. I assume if it can happen there it can happen with Testing Labs just as easily.
So piss poor six months to a year ago, and systematic improvement over that year to a top performer. It happens all the time.@mikebricker true but freedoms issues are recent so there’s that. At least ILS was trying to hire a QC officer to help fix their issues. And how do you know who made systemic improvements? The lab you love operates like it’s 1975 from a tech standpoint. That alone is kind of telling. If their front end technology is bad makes you wonder about the back end. Changes can be made for sure and companies and labs can improve. We just haven’t seen that with Freedom. We would need something quantifiable to point too and I think most people would be open to it.
-
@mikebricker true but freedoms issues are recent so there’s that. At least ILS was trying to hire a QC officer to help fix their issues. And how do you know who made systemic improvements? The lab you love operates like it’s 1975 from a tech standpoint. That alone is kind of telling. If their front end technology is bad makes you wonder about the back end. Changes can be made for sure and companies and labs can improve. We just haven’t seen that with Freedom. We would need something quantifiable to point too and I think most people would be open to it.
-
@mikebricker true but freedoms issues are recent so there’s that. At least ILS was trying to hire a QC officer to help fix their issues. And how do you know who made systemic improvements? The lab you love operates like it’s 1975 from a tech standpoint. That alone is kind of telling. If their front end technology is bad makes you wonder about the back end. Changes can be made for sure and companies and labs can improve. We just haven’t seen that with Freedom. We would need something quantifiable to point too and I think most people would be open to it.
@Stevepep We don’t cut corners. Freedom costs us more than Vanguard would, so this was never about saving money. I get that some people here don’t like Freedom, but that’s not the same as us cutting corners.
if we were cutting corners, why would we come on here and make ourselves so open about what we do, what you're accusing us of is just wrong
-
@Stevepep We don’t cut corners. Freedom costs us more than Vanguard would, so this was never about saving money. I get that some people here don’t like Freedom, but that’s not the same as us cutting corners.
if we were cutting corners, why would we come on here and make ourselves so open about what we do, what you're accusing us of is just wrong
@StudzPeptides you come on here to drum up business, you’re fooling no one. You asked and people gave you every opportunity. Me included. I took you at your word. You aren’t talking your way out of this with your nice guy routine. You use Freedom because they are fast which means you can sell your products right away. Did you ever wonder how they test so fast with the pass/fail nonsense?
-
@mikebricker you can’t be this unaware you post on here more than me and that’s saying something. You want to point to one issue with a lab to make a point that’s fine. Do a search and see all the freedom issues. The one thing they do well is get you your 99pct results in a day or two. Nexaph literally called them out. Peter has called them out. Other labs have as well because they are worried they will screw up the market when someone gets hurt and that ruins it for everyone.
-
@mikebricker you can’t be this unaware you post on here more than me and that’s saying something. You want to point to one issue with a lab to make a point that’s fine. Do a search and see all the freedom issues. The one thing they do well is get you your 99pct results in a day or two. Nexaph literally called them out. Peter has called them out. Other labs have as well because they are worried they will screw up the market when someone gets hurt and that ruins it for everyone.
@Stevepep I hear you. How about some links? You can DM me if you don’t want to post online. I just joined Critic a few months ago. So no, I haven’t seen the Freedom issues. All I’ve seen so far are third hand “you can get 99% no matter what” with them, and third hand “K A always comes in light”. Other than that just the weight problem with Vanguard.
Years in QA and QC have taught me you never get caught the first time you do something. So how many incorrect weight calcs were done by Vanguard before the Critic caught them? Probably more than one….
-
@Stevepep I hear you. How about some links? You can DM me if you don’t want to post online. I just joined Critic a few months ago. So no, I haven’t seen the Freedom issues. All I’ve seen so far are third hand “you can get 99% no matter what” with them, and third hand “K A always comes in light”. Other than that just the weight problem with Vanguard.
Years in QA and QC have taught me you never get caught the first time you do something. So how many incorrect weight calcs were done by Vanguard before the Critic caught them? Probably more than one….@mikebricker https://testing.nexaph.com/TES1007182026-21
Right on Nexaph website take a look at the two different mass/purity COA’s.
And I am open to Krause they have two samples right now I am just waiting on them. I could care less about the lab name we just want accuracy in all phases and it’s not that hard
-
I hear you, @stevepep
When we first joined this site, nearly every lab we used drew criticism. We moved to Freedom, and apart from some members here on Peptide Critic, the feedback has been very positive. We’re still a young company and still going through growing pains, but we stand behind the quality of what we ship.
Every lab makes mistakes, and that includes Freedom and Vanguard. I noticed you were asking about Vanguard’s issues in another thread too. Hundreds of peptide companies use Freedom, which suggests they’re getting a lot right. Their customer service and response times have also been excellent, which hasn’t been our experience with Vanguard.
That doesn’t mean we’ll stay with Freedom forever. If the data tells us to switch, we will. I am not trying to convince you guys of anything, just being honest with what we are doing and why, and all it is met with is harsh criticism, at the end of the day, every lab is only as good as the trust any individual researcher has in it, I will look into places like trustpoint, but Vanguard has made it horrible in every fashion to work with
We have had only 4 tests every fail with Vanguard, we sent 2/4 of those items to freedom to compare, yet you guys also push aside the fact those results were also within 3% variance from lab to lab
That being said, we are ALWAYS trying to improve, I will leave it at that on my end whether or not you want to believe that I respect your decision and opinion
Hundreds of peptide companies use Freedom, which suggests they’re getting a lot right.
Or they are using Freedom, because they always get a high purity % (which again now we are finding out is not accurate) and you get back results quickly. Don't make the mistake thinking because so many use them, they are good and respectable. At the end of the day, its the consumer who chooses who is a leader and who isn't. And this community as well as others that @stevepep has mentioned in group buys, telegrams etc are steering away from Freedom as people are questioning their actual testing capability being accurate.
Perhaps you are doing amazing sales and having nice growth, but I suspect if that was the case you wouldn't really be here. You are looking for more business, and this thread and community has told you what it takes to get it from us. Everyday because of sites like this, the consumer is becoming more educated and aware what we should expect and look for. If there was no competition out there you could get away with not even offering a COA, But again the market is saturated and providing testing and trackable COAs has become the bare minimum we all expect now. If it's repeat business you are looking for, then you know what you need to do.
-
Hundreds of peptide companies use Freedom, which suggests they’re getting a lot right.
Or they are using Freedom, because they always get a high purity % (which again now we are finding out is not accurate) and you get back results quickly. Don't make the mistake thinking because so many use them, they are good and respectable. At the end of the day, its the consumer who chooses who is a leader and who isn't. And this community as well as others that @stevepep has mentioned in group buys, telegrams etc are steering away from Freedom as people are questioning their actual testing capability being accurate.
Perhaps you are doing amazing sales and having nice growth, but I suspect if that was the case you wouldn't really be here. You are looking for more business, and this thread and community has told you what it takes to get it from us. Everyday because of sites like this, the consumer is becoming more educated and aware what we should expect and look for. If there was no competition out there you could get away with not even offering a COA, But again the market is saturated and providing testing and trackable COAs has become the bare minimum we all expect now. If it's repeat business you are looking for, then you know what you need to do.
@denti Very valid statement, and I appreciate the honesty and proffessionalism and also understanding, I dont think it ever hurts to ask more people what they prefer and thats what this comes from
I also understand you guys are very vanguard heavy in preference, which is also why I ask these things, because again there is alos a very LARGE part of the community that love freedom, through and through, so that's why I come on here and ask
-
@mikebricker you can’t be this unaware you post on here more than me and that’s saying something. You want to point to one issue with a lab to make a point that’s fine. Do a search and see all the freedom issues. The one thing they do well is get you your 99pct results in a day or two. Nexaph literally called them out. Peter has called them out. Other labs have as well because they are worried they will screw up the market when someone gets hurt and that ruins it for everyone.
@mikebricker you can’t be this unaware you post on here more than me and that’s saying something. You want to point to one issue with a lab to make a point that’s fine. Do a search and see all the freedom issues. The one thing they do well is get you your 99pct results in a day or two. Nexaph literally called them out. Peter has called them out. Other labs have as well because they are worried they will screw up the market when someone gets hurt and that ruins it for everyone.
^^^ THIS SO MUCH.
Is Vanguard perfect? Absolutely not. Is Freedom basically untrustworthy and trash at this point? Yeah, pretty much. So it's an easy choice.
Studz came here because he wants our business. Those who post and those who just browse. Yeah it sucks for him it takes a month to get a COA and that's capital for him tied up in inventory that is just sitting there that is not being turned over. But this is the business he chose to get in, which again has little to no barriers to entry. So it's the price he must pay if he wants more business as the consumer becomes more educated daily because of sites like this. If he just wants one time business off people who don't know any better, then he should just go advertise on FB and TikTok. But eventually those consumers also become educated and end up in places like here.
Nexaph has earned its reputation and Goliath position in this industry for a reason. It wasn't because they cut corners. Other high end retailers like Peptidology also earned their reputation even though their prices are sky high. It's because they also don't cut corners.
@studzpeptides You don't lyophilize yourself. You are a reseller from the same places I can purchase from. Not sure what you expect from us. To give you a pass for using Freedom because Vanguard takes so long? There is nothing proprietary to your business that puts you in a position to get a pass from us, the consumer.
-
@mikebricker https://testing.nexaph.com/TES1007182026-21
Right on Nexaph website take a look at the two different mass/purity COA’s.
And I am open to Krause they have two samples right now I am just waiting on them. I could care less about the lab name we just want accuracy in all phases and it’s not that hard
@Stevepep Interesting. I’m assuming this isn’t an isolated incident, so there must be dozens like this?
-
@Stevepep Interesting. I’m assuming this isn’t an isolated incident, so there must be dozens like this?
@mikebricker yup, here is another, there are more than dozens https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/3449/freedom-again?_=1793744446457. Not gonna do the work for ya though
-
@denti Very valid statement, and I appreciate the honesty and proffessionalism and also understanding, I dont think it ever hurts to ask more people what they prefer and thats what this comes from
I also understand you guys are very vanguard heavy in preference, which is also why I ask these things, because again there is alos a very LARGE part of the community that love freedom, through and through, so that's why I come on here and ask
@StudzPeptides If it makes you feel any better I hate them all. They all make mistakes.
-
@StudzPeptides If it makes you feel any better I hate them all. They all make mistakes.
@Randy Kinda the message I am trying to portray, but I appreciate you
-
@StudzPeptides If it makes you feel any better I hate them all. They all make mistakes.
-
-
@MikeMiranda look at Reta my man
-
@MikeMiranda look at Reta my man
@MikeMiranda look at Reta my man
The Reta 10 was an outside test from someone 60% purity is kinda crazy
The Re-test from Jano came back good
https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/247521-RETATRUTIDE_Q3KWD8TMJZQB
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login