Discussion: SF Bay Area Peptides
-
This is the official discussion thread for a vendor on PeptideCritic.com.
View the vendor profile: SF Bay Area Peptides
Share your experiences with this vendor, ask questions, or add information that might help other community members.
Please keep discussions respectful and factual.
-
It’s common practice in the industry to work with multiple testing labs, and this approach supports transparency and accuracy. In this instance, Purilabs offered the site administrator a free blind test with a lab of his choice to demonstrate credibility, but he declined and proceeded to post critical remarks after I questioned his assertion that our lab partner was “questionable at best.” Furthermore, criticism regarding our website’s user-friendliness was cited as a reason for denying our vendor listing, which I believe is unrelated to product quality or verification.
For additional context, Lost Coast Aminos documented on social media that they submitted three of their peptides to Purilabs for testing, having previously verified these with another trusted lab. The results from Purilabs were consistent with their past lab's findings, reinforcing the reliability of the testing process.
Using more than one lab and maintaining selective publishing standards—such as only sharing Purilabs results when they align with the COAs from our vendors—are practices intended to ensure quality, not to appear misleading. Notably, the owner of Lost Coast Aminos has also stated an intention to migrate all their testing to Purilabs once necessary references are in place. https://www.tiktok.com/@lostcoastaminos4/video/7698086457130437901?_r=1&_t=ZP-9AfmL56cnMt
-
We only published our Purilabs COA's when the results matched up to our vendors COA's which we also let the site admin know before he posted the above comment...
-
You applied to Peptide Critic and somehow skipped the “Critic” part. We investigate vendors, scrutinize COAs and commission independent testing. A little homework would have saved you the surprise. We are glad you skipped it.
“Selective publishing standards” is doing some impressive heavy lifting here. You’ve now said twice that you only publish Purilab results when they match your supplier’s COAs. Your supplier’s COA isn’t an answer key.
Have you received any results that didn’t match? If so, what happened to those reports and those batches? Were the products held, rejected or sent to another lab? Would customers see the original result alongside any retest?
And why send products to Purilab when you already use Freedom?
Telling a site that investigates testing practices that you selectively publish test results is certainly an introduction.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login