Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Freedom Again
Prize
Three Pens + Filters & Cartridges
Ends in
11231 entries · 4541 participants
Enter →

Freedom Again

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
45 Posts 13 Posters 1.1k Views 1 Watching
Freedom Again Freedom Again
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Stevepep

    @mikebricker I like it now if they could just get an accurate measurement of quantity they might be on to something.

    M Offline
    M Offline
    mikebricker
    wrote last edited by mikebricker
    #23

    @Stevepep Yeah, I don’t think it’s as bad as you think. For a 10mg label on a few peps, K was 9.3mg and J was 11.2 same batch numbers. K is very consistent with the weights. Not sure what their method is, but one is low and the other high. Which is correct, or maybe both are off a bit? Hard to say.
    I will say I’ve never seen a J chromatogram or MS trace with their COAs. So I can ask Claude or Grok to analyze the COA and tell me about the ID and purity from the supplied traces, or view the reference standard compared to my sample…. Hmmmm… Then there’s the triple the price issue….

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • M mikebricker

      @Stevepep Yeah, I don’t think it’s as bad as you think. For a 10mg label on a few peps, K was 9.3mg and J was 11.2 same batch numbers. K is very consistent with the weights. Not sure what their method is, but one is low and the other high. Which is correct, or maybe both are off a bit? Hard to say.
      I will say I’ve never seen a J chromatogram or MS trace with their COAs. So I can ask Claude or Grok to analyze the COA and tell me about the ID and purity from the supplied traces, or view the reference standard compared to my sample…. Hmmmm… Then there’s the triple the price issue….

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Stevepep
      wrote last edited by
      #24

      @mikebricker I get it you like them I think we all do at this point. Just search the forum it’s not just being under its inconsistency. Try it send them vials from the same batch weeks apart. People did it on Finnrick and got different weights. It’s why it’s hard to find a company who uses them and they cozied up to Finnrick.

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • S Stevepep

        @mikebricker I get it you like them I think we all do at this point. Just search the forum it’s not just being under its inconsistency. Try it send them vials from the same batch weeks apart. People did it on Finnrick and got different weights. It’s why it’s hard to find a company who uses them and they cozied up to Finnrick.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        mikebricker
        wrote last edited by mikebricker
        #25

        @Stevepep The past is the past, and not a solid indicator of present and future performance. 😉

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M mikebricker

          @Stevepep The past is the past, and not a solid indicator of present and future performance. 😉

          D Offline
          D Offline
          denti
          wrote last edited by
          #26

          @mikebricker said:

          @Stevepep The past is the past, and not a solid indicator of present and future performance. 😉

          That doesn’t apply to untrustworthy companies and people. Past is most certainly indicative of future performance.

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • O Offline
            O Offline
            ogsteve
            wrote last edited by ogsteve
            #27

            I literally cont give two shits about sterility. Full fricking stop.

            Everything get filtered thru at least a 0.22 and anything j cant do with BAC or i feel might benefit gets the 0.10um.

            If its not sterile in the vial it's not gonna grow there either especially if its frozen or in the fridge.

            Endo. Thats whats far more important than sterility.

            As for janoshik. The number of COA i see with no vial ID on them is WAY more than it should be for the price. $750 COA with no vile ID is worth zero dollars. Also, why are they not showing the spectrogram?.

            Freedom always shows me vile ID and pictures and the spectrogram and methods used to evaluate that I can look at myself. This makes a freedom COA more useful than a janoshik with info missing because they are too busy to add that info in.

            These are just objective facts, even if you don’t like freedom for some reason.

            senex_musS S 2 Replies Last reply
            3
            • O ogsteve

              I literally cont give two shits about sterility. Full fricking stop.

              Everything get filtered thru at least a 0.22 and anything j cant do with BAC or i feel might benefit gets the 0.10um.

              If its not sterile in the vial it's not gonna grow there either especially if its frozen or in the fridge.

              Endo. Thats whats far more important than sterility.

              As for janoshik. The number of COA i see with no vial ID on them is WAY more than it should be for the price. $750 COA with no vile ID is worth zero dollars. Also, why are they not showing the spectrogram?.

              Freedom always shows me vile ID and pictures and the spectrogram and methods used to evaluate that I can look at myself. This makes a freedom COA more useful than a janoshik with info missing because they are too busy to add that info in.

              These are just objective facts, even if you don’t like freedom for some reason.

              senex_musS Offline
              senex_musS Offline
              senex_mus
              wrote last edited by senex_mus
              #28

              @ogsteve endos may come along for the ride with non-sterility unfortunately. Think levels likely depend upon how much growth there's been in the vial and the resulting garbage generated. Another reason to keep things chilled and dry if possible; cooling and dehydration slow growth.

              https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/endotoxin
              "Endotoxin is defined as a toxic substance released from the outer membrane of certain bacteria, such as E. coli, primarily consisting of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which includes lipid A. It is responsible for various diseases in humans and is a significant contaminant in the pharmaceutical and food industries."

              O 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O ogsteve

                I literally cont give two shits about sterility. Full fricking stop.

                Everything get filtered thru at least a 0.22 and anything j cant do with BAC or i feel might benefit gets the 0.10um.

                If its not sterile in the vial it's not gonna grow there either especially if its frozen or in the fridge.

                Endo. Thats whats far more important than sterility.

                As for janoshik. The number of COA i see with no vial ID on them is WAY more than it should be for the price. $750 COA with no vile ID is worth zero dollars. Also, why are they not showing the spectrogram?.

                Freedom always shows me vile ID and pictures and the spectrogram and methods used to evaluate that I can look at myself. This makes a freedom COA more useful than a janoshik with info missing because they are too busy to add that info in.

                These are just objective facts, even if you don’t like freedom for some reason.

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Stevepep
                wrote last edited by Stevepep
                #29

                @ogsteve I don’t like freedom because they have proven to be inaccurate on purity, endotoxins and sterility other than that they are great. This was proven out by vendors themselves sending samples to multiple labs.

                Vendors opt out of the photos at every lab it’s not the lab it’s the vendor on that issue.

                Filtering will not get all contaminants I filter as an added safety step. Not caring about sterility is nuts imo. Killing off the bacteria creates endotoxins they go hand and hand for the most part. Peter from Janoshik has said many times if a sample passes sterility it’s is extremely rare to not pass endotoxins and said the opposite is also true. In fact he said he would just test for sterility and not endotoxins.

                O 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • senex_musS Offline
                  senex_musS Offline
                  senex_mus
                  wrote last edited by senex_mus
                  #30

                  Yah, I'm looking for a low cost, reputable lab as well... QA at most labs seem questionable.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stevepep

                    @ogsteve I don’t like freedom because they have proven to be inaccurate on purity, endotoxins and sterility other than that they are great. This was proven out by vendors themselves sending samples to multiple labs.

                    Vendors opt out of the photos at every lab it’s not the lab it’s the vendor on that issue.

                    Filtering will not get all contaminants I filter as an added safety step. Not caring about sterility is nuts imo. Killing off the bacteria creates endotoxins they go hand and hand for the most part. Peter from Janoshik has said many times if a sample passes sterility it’s is extremely rare to not pass endotoxins and said the opposite is also true. In fact he said he would just test for sterility and not endotoxins.

                    O Offline
                    O Offline
                    ogsteve
                    wrote last edited by ogsteve
                    #31

                    @Stevepep lol. I hear what you are saying. Personally i dont interpret the data like that as its more of a correlation vs causation arguement on whether the individual vial was bad or the extended shipping time to Czechoslovakia or the lab methodology or the preparation (ever seen them dip into that giant open container of sterile water repeatedly?). There are just too many intervening factors for me to outright condemn a lab that at least consistently produces quality COAs with the requisite data every time.

                    Now when we get to the 99.89% consistent results, I don’t agree with not including peaks outside of the identified compound in the overall purity percentage. Were it me I would like to have all of the items in the vile listed along with the amount that’s in there. To me that’s real data and I agree with your condemnation on that front 100%. Of course that is certainly not limited to freedom diagnostics

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • B Offline
                      B Offline
                      Blackline Scientific
                      wrote last edited by
                      #32

                      I run Blackline Scientific, and Freedom tests every batch we sell, so I read this thread closely. If a report is wrong, post the full report and the batch it belongs to so it can be checked line by line. That is fair game and it should be. What I can say from our side is that every certificate for our products is published on the product page for anyone to read before ordering, and when a question comes up we answer it in the open. Testing only means something when the reports stay public and anyone can question them.

                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • senex_musS senex_mus

                        @ogsteve endos may come along for the ride with non-sterility unfortunately. Think levels likely depend upon how much growth there's been in the vial and the resulting garbage generated. Another reason to keep things chilled and dry if possible; cooling and dehydration slow growth.

                        https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/endotoxin
                        "Endotoxin is defined as a toxic substance released from the outer membrane of certain bacteria, such as E. coli, primarily consisting of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which includes lipid A. It is responsible for various diseases in humans and is a significant contaminant in the pharmaceutical and food industries."

                        O Offline
                        O Offline
                        ogsteve
                        wrote last edited by
                        #33

                        @senex_mus I agree with this. My point was that, even if it has bacteria in the vile that caused the endotoxins, the bacteria is not producing any more endotoxins while it’s in the vile. Only once it’s reconstitute, it is capable of producing more endotoxins at which point we just filter the bacteria out and move on with life.

                        Does that make sense. Am I missing something?

                        senex_musS pep_researcherP 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • B Blackline Scientific

                          I run Blackline Scientific, and Freedom tests every batch we sell, so I read this thread closely. If a report is wrong, post the full report and the batch it belongs to so it can be checked line by line. That is fair game and it should be. What I can say from our side is that every certificate for our products is published on the product page for anyone to read before ordering, and when a question comes up we answer it in the open. Testing only means something when the reports stay public and anyone can question them.

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          denti
                          wrote last edited by denti
                          #34

                          @Blackline-Scientific said:

                          I run Blackline Scientific, and Freedom tests every batch we sell, so I read this thread closely. If a report is wrong, post the full report and the batch it belongs to so it can be checked line by line. That is fair game and it should be. What I can say from our side is that every certificate for our products is published on the product page for anyone to read before ordering, and when a question comes up we answer it in the open. Testing only means something when the reports stay public and anyone can question them.

                          Clearly you haven't been paying attention and just here to spam your site. Go spend some time on here and read why we DO NOT respect Freedom Lab which you are using. Has nothing to do with just publishing COA's. That's an obvious that every vendor should be doing at the very least.

                          pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • O ogsteve

                            @senex_mus I agree with this. My point was that, even if it has bacteria in the vile that caused the endotoxins, the bacteria is not producing any more endotoxins while it’s in the vile. Only once it’s reconstitute, it is capable of producing more endotoxins at which point we just filter the bacteria out and move on with life.

                            Does that make sense. Am I missing something?

                            senex_musS Offline
                            senex_musS Offline
                            senex_mus
                            wrote last edited by
                            #35

                            @ogsteve 👍

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • O ogsteve

                              @senex_mus I agree with this. My point was that, even if it has bacteria in the vile that caused the endotoxins, the bacteria is not producing any more endotoxins while it’s in the vile. Only once it’s reconstitute, it is capable of producing more endotoxins at which point we just filter the bacteria out and move on with life.

                              Does that make sense. Am I missing something?

                              pep_researcherP Online
                              pep_researcherP Online
                              pep_researcher
                              wrote last edited by
                              #36

                              @ogsteve This is not right. Endotoxins residues even without active bacteria can cause serious adverse research outcomes and they don't get filtered out using regular pep filters.

                              Recall that JEEP Tirz batches with horrendous endotoxins levels had passed sterility tests. You can find COAs on this forum.

                              senex_musS O 2 Replies Last reply
                              2
                              • D denti

                                @Blackline-Scientific said:

                                I run Blackline Scientific, and Freedom tests every batch we sell, so I read this thread closely. If a report is wrong, post the full report and the batch it belongs to so it can be checked line by line. That is fair game and it should be. What I can say from our side is that every certificate for our products is published on the product page for anyone to read before ordering, and when a question comes up we answer it in the open. Testing only means something when the reports stay public and anyone can question them.

                                Clearly you haven't been paying attention and just here to spam your site. Go spend some time on here and read why we DO NOT respect Freedom Lab which you are using. Has nothing to do with just publishing COA's. That's an obvious that every vendor should be doing at the very least.

                                pep_researcherP Online
                                pep_researcherP Online
                                pep_researcher
                                wrote last edited by pep_researcher
                                #37

                                @denti Yup, amusing how vendors feel offended when they see critical content on the labs they are using.

                                Instead of bringing their receipts to prove their testing, say COAs from another lab that the forum vets, they get in the mud to defend their lab. Vendor and lab romance is a huge red flag.

                                I think Randy needs to create a separate directory — vendors with subpar labs yet hostile attitude. 😂

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  denti
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #38

                                  @randy I think you have another red banner to add for Blackline-Scientific above. LOL they don't even have COA's posted for a lot of their items they sell. Instead they have a pdf of "Safety Data Sheet" for some of their items. Some of these vendors really are the dumbest people out there. Come on this site, which has a load of informed members, and try to spam your site while you own yourself. Amazing.

                                  https://www.blacklinescientific.com/products/glp-s-20mg

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • RandyR Offline
                                    RandyR Offline
                                    Randy
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #39

                                    @denti Good catch.

                                    Funny enough they applied on the 24th. I'm going to expedite their request 😉

                                    "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • RandyR Offline
                                      RandyR Offline
                                      Randy
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #40

                                      https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/3540/discussion-blackline-scientific

                                      https://peptidecritic.com/vendor/blackline-scientific

                                      They list "the collective" on "their tests" when they are available. Its so lazy I cant even.

                                      "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        TXLabRat
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #41

                                        Freedom gives the vendor what they want.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • RandyR Randy

                                          https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/3540/discussion-blackline-scientific

                                          https://peptidecritic.com/vendor/blackline-scientific

                                          They list "the collective" on "their tests" when they are available. Its so lazy I cant even.

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          denti
                                          wrote last edited by denti
                                          #42

                                          @Randy said:

                                          https://community.peptidecritic.com/topic/3540/discussion-blackline-scientific

                                          https://peptidecritic.com/vendor/blackline-scientific

                                          They list "the collective" on "their tests" when they are available. Its so lazy I cant even.

                                          Everyone should check out Randy's links for Blackline Scientific. You will certainly enjoy the comedy on how dumb this vendor is and how easily they got caught.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups