One suggestion that could make this significantly more valuable would be to consolidate more grey vendor data into a standardized format. For example:

• Lab results and testing history
• Dates of testing/results
• Third‑party references (PeptideCompare metascores, Peptide.Chat analysis, etc.)
• Pricing (use the most popular kits as a metric, include shipping)
• Dedicated forum threads organized by vendor to make updates easier to follow
• Current Telegram, Discord, and website links (a number of the links in the pinned message appear to have already expired)

It might also be helpful to develop a weighted scoring framework similar to what some of the other review sites use. That could incorporate factors such as testing history, consistency, customer experiences, transparency, community feedback, and overall risk profile.

The goal would be to give people a single place where they can evaluate grey‑market vendors holistically and compare the risks, benefits, and overall community experience more objectively.

Thanks for all the work you've already put into this