Skip to content

Forum Feedback

Suggestions, bug reports, and feedback about the forum itself.

This category can be followed from the open social web via the handle [email protected]

10 Topics 41 Posts
  • Public forum

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    267 Views
    M
    Verification issue, joined community, received email to verify email, clicked link, "link may be broken or may have expired ". Just keeping you updated. But I am a real human and my email belongs to me
  • Test Result Section - Locked

    5
    1 Votes
    5 Posts
    140 Views
    C
    @randy Question on this. I don’t know the limitation of the software that powers this forum, but… Is it possible to make a Category “Testing Results” and by default when someone creates a post or thread, whatever it is called, that it is automatically locked where no one can reply to it? That would kind of keep it clean and cut down on unrelated poss in the thread?
  • two ideas. commonly asked questions thread? chat?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    69 Views
    quicksilver80Q
    @Commander fair. but theres ways around that. if i can manage a 100 plus member discord. shouldnt be much worse. best case set it to slow posting. worst case limit everyones to 5 second post cooldown if its busy.
  • Section on common/parallel protocols

    1
    3 Votes
    1 Posts
    64 Views
    R
    Some questions from recent joiners, and maybe this exists, make me think it would be good to have a section or graphic on what common protocols can be run in parallel, what should be run serially or consecutive, etc. I am thinking things like: Yes, you can research NAD+ by itself but it may be beneficial to research SS-31 and MOTS-C first, or to follow the combined/overlapping protocol. Things okay to research alongside: GLP-1’s, GHRH, epitalon, … The above is just an example. I don’t think that I have the expertise to build an exhaustive list and I can only talk about what I have researched, so it would be spotty. I have seen videos by Josh and others talking about the general types of peptides which implies what you can and maybe shouldn’t research concurrently, but I haven’t seen anything exhaustive. Or maybe this all falls into the ‘hey, man, it’s all research’ bucket and you figure it out yourself. As Huberman has noted, the only way to hurt yourself with a lot of this stuff is to drop a pallet of it on your foot.
  • Vendor 3rd party testing feature

    3
    2 Votes
    3 Posts
    120 Views
    saltyaltyS
    Or on each vendor placing another tab (Products, Reviews, Details) - Adding in Community Testing tab. I'd be happy to upload my COA's... I've got about 18 of them and will continue to order.
  • A Back button…

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    153 Views
    C
    @MyB You are the best. This saved me. Apparently my iPhone (or me) needs a light touch to swipe
  • Thoughts on including a Library for Research articles

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    93 Views
    J
    I'm assuming that maybe indexing them would go a long way in finding them? Like all the words of the articles being searchable and not just the title.
  • The Warnins that used to up for vendors?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    77 Views
    C
    And please excuse my typos. That is what I get for having a small phone…
  • Add to Home Screen

    Moved
    7
    1
    4 Votes
    7 Posts
    248 Views
    saltyaltyS
    Well that's cool!
  • Mandatory Tags have to go…

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    79 Views
    C
    So I just wrote a long review and tried to post it. Forcing multiple tags, ya that has to go.. I just deleted what I wrote and didn’t post it. The search feature should pick up more than jist tags… It was a Nexaph review. I tried to just tag Nexaph, but it said I must put at least 2 tags. Again way to complicated… so no post. Why do things have to be this complicated? Vendor Reviews… I should be able to just post in it. The subject line should be enough.