Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Mots-c and SS-31
Prize
Peptide Critic Case and Pens
Ends in
3814 entries · 1657 participants
Enter →

Mots-c and SS-31

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
mots-cresearchingss-31
41 Posts 17 Posters 5.7k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N nosaj

    Looking for opinions on how necessary it is to run SS-31 before Mots-c. Ready to add Mots to my stack tomorrow and second guessing myself with all the talk about SS-31. Would it hurt to try the Mots first? I have a generally low carb diet and have intermittent fasted for years. Already have the Mots and adding to CJC/Ipa, Reta
    Thanks guys

    W Offline
    W Offline
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    @nosaj said in Mots-c and SS-31:

    Looking for opinions on how necessary it is to run SS-31 before Mots-c. Ready to add Mots to my stack tomorrow and second guessing myself with all the talk about SS-31. Would it hurt to try the Mots first? I have a generally low carb diet and have intermittent fasted for years. Already have the Mots and adding to CJC/Ipa, Reta
    Thanks guys

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Offline
      J Offline
      jackieee
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      Not sure, but I ran MOTS-c for almost 12 weeks and I have never run SS-31.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ResearchCatR Offline
        ResearchCatR Offline
        ResearchCat
        wrote last edited by
        #16

        If you don’t have significant metabolism dysfunction, you probably don’t need SS-31 beforehand.

        Yeah, well, I’m just here for the research, man. - The Dude

        If I haven’t liked your post, no offense. I have exceeded my daily allowance.

        quicksilver80Q 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • ResearchCatR ResearchCat

          If you don’t have significant metabolism dysfunction, you probably don’t need SS-31 beforehand.

          quicksilver80Q Offline
          quicksilver80Q Offline
          quicksilver80
          wrote last edited by
          #17

          @ResearchCat the way i see it is if alot of us were heavy to begin with. its not like our metabolism was doing good in the first place. im not seeing any serious side effects. worth a try.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Stan DouglasS Stan Douglas

            @gym.rat
            I'm at 8 today:
            Pre-workout: Mots & AOD
            Post workout; CJC[No Dac]+ Ipam
            Afternoon: 2nd CJC+
            Bedtime: Last CJC+, Pine and 2 Ghks

            and it's not even a NAD+ day.

            I would had bought stock in .3 syringes at the beginning of this hobby had I known I'd be going through so many.

            kenhnsyK Online
            kenhnsyK Online
            kenhnsy
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @Stan-Douglas said in Mots-c and SS-31:

            I'm at 8 today:

            I'm about to cycle back on and count 12 filled pens in the refrigerator. 2 more coming up. Freaks. All of you.

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • ResearchCatR Offline
              ResearchCatR Offline
              ResearchCat
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              @gym.rat @quicksilver80 Yeah, I am by no means the authority. A lot of us tend to do all of the things, and it’s hard to assume we either do or do not need on particular thing. I am willing to bet that researching MOTS-C by itself will be effective, but also that running the mechanic stack (SS-31, MOTS-C, NAD+) will also be effective. I don’t know how old or healthy people are, and while I often assume the young folks are in better shape than me, I have been made aware that a lot of young guys’ metabolisms are messed up for a variety of reasons.

              As the saying goes, “that’s why they call it research.”

              My standard disclaimer is that I am focused on longevity and healthspan, so I won’t know if any of it is working until I’m dead.

              Yeah, well, I’m just here for the research, man. - The Dude

              If I haven’t liked your post, no offense. I have exceeded my daily allowance.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • J jackieee

                @commander , how long have you been doing Mt-2 three times per week? I did MT-1 for 10 days straight and I got the best tan! It is dark and such a nice color. It's been 3 weeks and I have hardly lost any of it and I haven't pinned it since.

                I currently take two: GHK-cu twice daily and TA-1 twice weekly. I will cycle MOTS-c again in a few weeks.

                My hubby is taking Reta twice weekly and Wolverine daily.

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Commander
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @jackie
                Only a couple of weeks so far

                Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jackieee
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  I got SO dark after 10 days on MT-1.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Juan Doe

                    Isn’t it nad + that helps with mitochondria repair?

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    theckman80
                    wrote last edited by
                    #22

                    @Juan-Doe NAD+ is what your mitochondria burn to make ATP. You can actually duel the salvage pathway with niacinamide (niacin) and your body turns it into nad+. Its a lot cheaper that way.

                    The ninja nerd guy on YouTube has some great videos on the Electron Transpot Chain/Cellular Respiration.

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • T theckman80

                      @Juan-Doe NAD+ is what your mitochondria burn to make ATP. You can actually duel the salvage pathway with niacinamide (niacin) and your body turns it into nad+. Its a lot cheaper that way.

                      The ninja nerd guy on YouTube has some great videos on the Electron Transpot Chain/Cellular Respiration.

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Juan Doe
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      @theckman80 Niacin. Just straight supplement? Sounds too simple to be true.

                      vpepsV 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Juan Doe

                        @theckman80 Niacin. Just straight supplement? Sounds too simple to be true.

                        vpepsV Offline
                        vpepsV Offline
                        vpeps
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        @Juan-Doe Niacin works well to raise my NAD levels in cells. A 500 mg Niacin pill works a lot better than NMN or NR at higher doses as I tested. I did "Intracellular NAD" tests before and after, multiple times. And those NAD+ injections are virtually useless, except some transient feel-good (or bad for some) they don't raise NAD in the tissues.
                        Another story though is to ask whether we benefit from high NAD levels. I am not sure about it, probably not. But if you want them up, Niacin works the best.

                        attentiion is all you need

                        J W 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • vpepsV vpeps

                          @Juan-Doe Niacin works well to raise my NAD levels in cells. A 500 mg Niacin pill works a lot better than NMN or NR at higher doses as I tested. I did "Intracellular NAD" tests before and after, multiple times. And those NAD+ injections are virtually useless, except some transient feel-good (or bad for some) they don't raise NAD in the tissues.
                          Another story though is to ask whether we benefit from high NAD levels. I am not sure about it, probably not. But if you want them up, Niacin works the best.

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Juan Doe
                          wrote last edited by
                          #25

                          @vpeptides NMN or NR???? what are those?

                          @gym.rat Niacinamide? Vitamin B3? in what form? Cream, pill, injection?

                          My mind is going places right now because of this.

                          vpepsV 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Juan Doe

                            @vpeptides NMN or NR???? what are those?

                            @gym.rat Niacinamide? Vitamin B3? in what form? Cream, pill, injection?

                            My mind is going places right now because of this.

                            vpepsV Offline
                            vpepsV Offline
                            vpeps
                            wrote last edited by
                            #26

                            @Juan-Doe those are NAD precursors, similar to Niacin but a lot more expensive, usually taken orally.

                            attentiion is all you need

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Commander

                              I take at least 4 a day. Now I am going to add SS-31 in.

                              Mots-C
                              NAD+
                              KLOW
                              Tesa/Ipa
                              Reta 2/weekly
                              MT2 3/weekly
                              This would not be possible if it wasn’t for the Pens.
                              Anyone not using Pens, I suggest you go over to the store section on here and buy at least 4 pens. If you only buy one pen, you will be back for more. So save on the shipping and just buy 4 from the start, it will save you money in the long run…

                              I Offline
                              I Offline
                              iMemphis18
                              wrote last edited by
                              #27

                              @Commander out of curiosity, I don't disagree that its so much faster, but I feel like its a bit of a waste for certain peptides right?

                              For example, Tesamorelin, 10 MG, with 1ML Bac water, i do 2mg -- which is 20 units. After about 4-5 days, i need to refill again, swap vials etc.

                              or.... do people combine for example, 3 vials of Tesa, 10mg into the injection pen vial? This will def make each 3ML pen vial last longer. I am just curious on your thoughts. Been debating on $$ vs time saved. Especially since we need to buy the separate needle, then the 3 ML vial to go with the pen.

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T Offline
                                T Offline
                                theckman80
                                wrote last edited by
                                #28

                                @gym.rat I didn't know it had an effect on arthritis, ill have to get some for my brother.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • I iMemphis18

                                  @Commander out of curiosity, I don't disagree that its so much faster, but I feel like its a bit of a waste for certain peptides right?

                                  For example, Tesamorelin, 10 MG, with 1ML Bac water, i do 2mg -- which is 20 units. After about 4-5 days, i need to refill again, swap vials etc.

                                  or.... do people combine for example, 3 vials of Tesa, 10mg into the injection pen vial? This will def make each 3ML pen vial last longer. I am just curious on your thoughts. Been debating on $$ vs time saved. Especially since we need to buy the separate needle, then the 3 ML vial to go with the pen.

                                  C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Commander
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #29

                                  @iMemphis18 said in Mots-c and SS-31:

                                  @Commander out of curiosity, I don't disagree that its so much faster, but I feel like its a bit of a waste for certain peptides right?

                                  For example, Tesamorelin, 10 MG, with 1ML Bac water, i do 2mg -- which is 20 units. After about 4-5 days, i need to refill again, swap vials etc.

                                  or.... do people combine for example, 3 vials of Tesa, 10mg into the injection pen vial? This will def make each 3ML pen vial last longer. I am just curious on your thoughts. Been debating on $$ vs time saved. Especially since we need to buy the separate needle, then the 3 ML vial to go with the pen.

                                  I put 3 vials of 10mg Tesa in the pen cart. That is how you save time.

                                  Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                                  I 1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • vpepsV vpeps

                                    @Juan-Doe Niacin works well to raise my NAD levels in cells. A 500 mg Niacin pill works a lot better than NMN or NR at higher doses as I tested. I did "Intracellular NAD" tests before and after, multiple times. And those NAD+ injections are virtually useless, except some transient feel-good (or bad for some) they don't raise NAD in the tissues.
                                    Another story though is to ask whether we benefit from high NAD levels. I am not sure about it, probably not. But if you want them up, Niacin works the best.

                                    W Offline
                                    W Offline
                                    WowwyZowwy
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #30

                                    @vpeptides Regarding NAD+ injections being "useless," any specific research that you can share on this? Anecdotally, the feedback within this community has been overwhelmingly positive (especially between the 50-100mg daily dosage. Could it really be all placebo effect? For context, what dosages were utilized in the studies you're referencing?

                                    vpepsV 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ResearchCatR Offline
                                      ResearchCatR Offline
                                      ResearchCat
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #31

                                      @commander running the same thing right now. The most I have stuffed into one cart is 7 vials of epitalon. I can only stuff 2 500mg NAD+ vials into one cart with 2.5ml bac water. A third will not dissolve (or fit.)

                                      Yeah, well, I’m just here for the research, man. - The Dude

                                      If I haven’t liked your post, no offense. I have exceeded my daily allowance.

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • W WowwyZowwy

                                        @vpeptides Regarding NAD+ injections being "useless," any specific research that you can share on this? Anecdotally, the feedback within this community has been overwhelmingly positive (especially between the 50-100mg daily dosage. Could it really be all placebo effect? For context, what dosages were utilized in the studies you're referencing?

                                        vpepsV Offline
                                        vpepsV Offline
                                        vpeps
                                        wrote last edited by vpeps
                                        #32

                                        @WowwyZowwy See this article, for example.

                                        In a recent pilot study, researchers found that NAD+ IVs did not elevate blood NAD+ until 24 hours after infusion—and then only by about 2% compared to baseline.6 This suggests that much of the infused NAD+ is broken down outside cells into smaller components like nicotinamide (NAM) or ADP-ribose.

                                        In that same pilot study, those receiving NAD+ IV also experienced an elevated white blood cell count, which may indicate an inflammatory immune response. When extracellular NAD+ levels in the bloodstream rise above normal, as can happen with high-dose IV infusions, the body may interpret this as trauma within the body, leading to an immune response, and potentially causing inflammation.

                                        attentiion is all you need

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          TrueNorth
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #33

                                          I came across a great video by Dr Brad Stanfield where he outlines a bunch of the NAD Literature and clinical data. He's not a peptide guy, he's a supplement guy, but the information is still excellent.

                                          The main conclusion of the clinical data as some have already noted, is that high dosing just straight is not only as effective but also significantly cheaper and efficient.

                                          The bigger question that gets covered in the video is 'does raising NAD Levels even make a difference?'. Again, using very recent clinical data as a reference, there isn't much evidence that raising NAD really makes much of a measurable difference.

                                          I don't I'm allowed to post links here, but if you search on YouTube under "New Study Says I Was Wrong About NMN and NR?" , a video from Dr Brad Stanfield should appear and it's worth a listen if you are interested in the literature surrounding NAD.

                                          Hammertime65H 1 Reply Last reply
                                          2

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups