Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community

Peptide Critic Community

  1. Randy the Rats Research Forum
  2. Supplies, Mixing & Storage
  3. Sterlization grade filtering?
Prize
Enter to Win a Gansulin Auto Injector Pen, with Carts a Pepboys Vial Storage Case
Ends in
6025 entries · 1000 participants
Enter →

Sterlization grade filtering?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Supplies, Mixing & Storage
filtersresearching
8 Posts 4 Posters 106 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kj4otu
    wrote last edited by kj4otu
    #1

    Having been on the bad end of a Reta batch that ended up failing sterility tests, I started down the rabbit hole of filters. I have been filtering using "sterile" 22 micron filters since I started researching peptides to help my wombat, but on researching what to do about this most recent test failure I realized that all filters are not made equally.

    I found that the pass/fail that janoshik gives for sterilization tests is not enough information to just move on, filter, and use failed peptides (not that I would, I'm just researching facts) and that the amount of "stuff" that a filter can clean up is limited - the filter can be overwhelmed, so you need need to know the level of failure for any sterility test if you were to theoretically want to remediate the contamination.

    Also I now understand that "normal" 22u filters are not up to the standard of "sterilization grade" filters and are perhaps not enough to give me the safety I'm looking for. The ones I found most commonly listed are the PureFlo D65 Disc Filter 0.65um / 0.2um - Sterile Compounding (Aqueous), but I'm having trouble finding a source these high grade filters.

    With all that said, what does Randy think about better filters and would he know a source for the Pureflo D65 filters?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      kj4otu
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      I guess I've stumped everybody? LOL @randy any thoughts on the need for sterilization grade filtering?

      RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K kj4otu

        I guess I've stumped everybody? LOL @randy any thoughts on the need for sterilization grade filtering?

        RandyR Offline
        RandyR Offline
        Randy
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @kj4otu .22 micron pes filters do the trick.

        "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • P Offline
          P Offline
          PeptidePete
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Worthy of a look and priced attractively: Cobetter 0.2μm Hydrophilic PVDF Syringe Filters for Sterile Filtration

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P PeptidePete

            Worthy of a look and priced attractively: Cobetter 0.2μm Hydrophilic PVDF Syringe Filters for Sterile Filtration

            P Offline
            P Offline
            PeptidePete
            wrote last edited by PeptidePete
            #5

            said in Sterlization grade filtering?:

            Worthy of a look and priced attractively: Cobetter 0.2μm Hydrophilic PVDF Syringe Filters for Sterile Filtration

            Those who care can investigate PES vs PVDF (both great) for water based agents.

            cobetter1.jpg co2.jpg

            Gratuitous supplies pics...lol 😋

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • R Online
              R Online
              ResearchCat
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              Love it!

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • K Offline
                K Offline
                kj4otu
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                After more reading this week I honestly believe the only difference between the "sterilization grade" filters and the sterile ones we are already using is the certification tests and related marking. Those tests are just spot checks though so I would think batches would still vary. Bottom line, it's all a calculated risk. Do the things you can do to make the calculations more likely to come out in your favor based on your comfort level.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Offline
                  K Offline
                  kj4otu
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  Also...Sorry guys, I left off the decimal in the filters i was describing. Meant to say ".22 micron" or ".22um". I guess nobody noticed, but 22um and .22um are vastly different things lol.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups