Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Nexaph reliability?
Prize
Three Pens + Filters & Cartridges
Ends in
11965 entries · 4898 participants
Enter →

Nexaph reliability?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
66 Posts 25 Posters 5.5k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pep_researcherP Offline
    pep_researcherP Offline
    pep_researcher
    wrote last edited by pep_researcher
    #30

    Read some discussion on Nexaph TG channel that they are starting to use Freedom due to long Janoshik delays?? ๐Ÿ˜ญ

    Was finally excited to start using Nexaph as they are adding endotoxin testing.

    Also what's the deal with their MOTS-C showing 97% purity on Jano and then 99% on Freedom?? Exactly same thing with Tesa too.

    vpepsV S 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      Shifted
      wrote last edited by
      #31

      Yeah I question that reasoning. The pre-order items have the testing done within about 2 weeks of people receiving the item. That's not a long time.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pep_researcherP Offline
        pep_researcherP Offline
        pep_researcher
        wrote last edited by
        #32

        I appreciate that they are putting out 97% purity COA transparently, but that difference is huge. Is there an explanation? I read Randy's blog which analysed why mass can be quite different but purity should match. Right?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

          Read some discussion on Nexaph TG channel that they are starting to use Freedom due to long Janoshik delays?? ๐Ÿ˜ญ

          Was finally excited to start using Nexaph as they are adding endotoxin testing.

          Also what's the deal with their MOTS-C showing 97% purity on Jano and then 99% on Freedom?? Exactly same thing with Tesa too.

          vpepsV Online
          vpepsV Online
          vpeps
          wrote last edited by
          #33

          @pep_researcher said:

          MOTS-C showing 97% purity on Jano and then 99% on Freedom?? Exactly same thing with Tesa too

          You are right. The same batch, 97.6%-97.7% on Janoshik COA and 99.99% for Tesa on Freedom Diagnostics COA. What does it tell us?

          attentiion is all you need

          pep_researcherP C 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • vpepsV vpeps

            @pep_researcher said:

            MOTS-C showing 97% purity on Jano and then 99% on Freedom?? Exactly same thing with Tesa too

            You are right. The same batch, 97.6%-97.7% on Janoshik COA and 99.99% for Tesa on Freedom Diagnostics COA. What does it tell us?

            pep_researcherP Offline
            pep_researcherP Offline
            pep_researcher
            wrote last edited by
            #34

            @vpeptides Is Lilly adulterating Nexa manufacturing plant as some kind of infiltration technique?

            Just kidding, or maybe not, getting conspiracy theories!

            But yeah I'm curious too, and then did Nexaph get a second COA from Freedom because Jano showed such a low purity results?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • vpepsV vpeps

              @pep_researcher said:

              MOTS-C showing 97% purity on Jano and then 99% on Freedom?? Exactly same thing with Tesa too

              You are right. The same batch, 97.6%-97.7% on Janoshik COA and 99.99% for Tesa on Freedom Diagnostics COA. What does it tell us?

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Commander
              wrote last edited by
              #35

              @vpeptides said:

              @pep_researcher said:

              MOTS-C showing 97% purity on Jano and then 99% on Freedom?? Exactly same thing with Tesa too

              You are right. The same batch, 97.6%-97.7% on Janoshik COA and 99.99% for Tesa on Freedom Diagnostics COA. What does it tell us?

              Freedom has been messing up a lot lately, in BIG waysโ€ฆ I wouldnโ€™t trust anything test from them.
              I use to use them all the time, but never again.

              Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                Read some discussion on Nexaph TG channel that they are starting to use Freedom due to long Janoshik delays?? ๐Ÿ˜ญ

                Was finally excited to start using Nexaph as they are adding endotoxin testing.

                Also what's the deal with their MOTS-C showing 97% purity on Jano and then 99% on Freedom?? Exactly same thing with Tesa too.

                S Online
                S Online
                Stevepep
                wrote last edited by
                #36

                @pep_researcher i emailed Cain on this and he said they are still using Janoshik some of the group tests may use other labs like Freedom though is what it sounds like

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • P Offline
                  P Offline
                  PeptideEd
                  wrote last edited by
                  #37

                  @pep_researcher The main purity/mass testing for the some Tesamorelin I just received is showing Freedom Labs - please note - I don't think this is a concern to me... but it appears to be more than just the group tests.

                  pep_researcherP S 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • P PeptideEd

                    @pep_researcher The main purity/mass testing for the some Tesamorelin I just received is showing Freedom Labs - please note - I don't think this is a concern to me... but it appears to be more than just the group tests.

                    pep_researcherP Offline
                    pep_researcherP Offline
                    pep_researcher
                    wrote last edited by
                    #38

                    @PeptideEd There's also the Janoshik mass/purity results tab right next to it showing different numbers. The concern is about difference. The TG channel mods said something about how each lab calculates expients, but then wouldn't that be same for all other compounds too, and wouldn't that be same for different batches within the same compound?

                    Was there a change in manufacturing process and raws?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P PeptideEd

                      @pep_researcher The main purity/mass testing for the some Tesamorelin I just received is showing Freedom Labs - please note - I don't think this is a concern to me... but it appears to be more than just the group tests.

                      S Online
                      S Online
                      Stevepep
                      wrote last edited by Stevepep
                      #39

                      @PeptideEd From Cain

                      Hi Steven,

                      We are not changing and will continue to use Janoshik as they are the gold standard.

                      They have the Janoshik COA there as well. Tested at two labs, and they show both; you just can't beat them. Freedom clearly has issues. Janoshik shows 3 vials tested for Mass, ID and Purity all very close. Plus Endotxins, Heavy metals and soon sterility all Janoshik.

                      If you want to buy from the gold standard, you found it. As Jeff calls it the easy button, you may pay more but its piece of mind

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • P Offline
                        P Offline
                        PeptideEd
                        wrote last edited by
                        #40

                        @stevepep sorry to have gotten that wrong... I'd missed the second mass/purity tab ๐Ÿ™‚ Now I just have to figure out how to get all the direct QR codes onto my labels and still remain phone scannable on a curved vial surface ๐Ÿ™‚

                        @pep_researcher I see that now... I am over all super pleased with the test coverage... but a little concerned about the less than 99% purity test from Jashonik.

                        S pep_researcherP N 3 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • P PeptideEd

                          @stevepep sorry to have gotten that wrong... I'd missed the second mass/purity tab ๐Ÿ™‚ Now I just have to figure out how to get all the direct QR codes onto my labels and still remain phone scannable on a curved vial surface ๐Ÿ™‚

                          @pep_researcher I see that now... I am over all super pleased with the test coverage... but a little concerned about the less than 99% purity test from Jashonik.

                          S Online
                          S Online
                          Stevepep
                          wrote last edited by
                          #41

                          @PeptideEd Ya, I wouldn't have ordered it, to be honest. The cat's out of the bag, though, so filter it and go slow.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • P PeptideEd

                            @stevepep sorry to have gotten that wrong... I'd missed the second mass/purity tab ๐Ÿ™‚ Now I just have to figure out how to get all the direct QR codes onto my labels and still remain phone scannable on a curved vial surface ๐Ÿ™‚

                            @pep_researcher I see that now... I am over all super pleased with the test coverage... but a little concerned about the less than 99% purity test from Jashonik.

                            pep_researcherP Offline
                            pep_researcherP Offline
                            pep_researcher
                            wrote last edited by
                            #42

                            @PeptideEd said:

                            concerned about the less than 99% purity test

                            Yup that was my point too.

                            Nevertheless I wanted to say that I still appreciate their brutal honesty. They could've just displayed Freedom COA saying they used Freedom for this batch.

                            So despite this anomaly, between them and a vendor hopping multiple labs for every batch, I would pick Nexa.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • P Offline
                              P Offline
                              PeptideEd
                              wrote last edited by
                              #43

                              OK... maybe I'm just slow today... but the links to Janoshik from the new test all the things sites at Nexaph are no longer direct... they take you to a form that needs the task id and unique key... the Nexaph end provides the unique key... but I don't see the task id anywhere. Am I just blind?

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P PeptideEd

                                OK... maybe I'm just slow today... but the links to Janoshik from the new test all the things sites at Nexaph are no longer direct... they take you to a form that needs the task id and unique key... the Nexaph end provides the unique key... but I don't see the task id anywhere. Am I just blind?

                                S Online
                                S Online
                                Stevepep
                                wrote last edited by
                                #44

                                @PeptideEd I just clicked on the box with the arrow, and it takes you directly to the COA on Janoshiks website

                                vpepsV 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  Commander
                                  wrote last edited by Commander
                                  #45

                                  I wish Nexaph had lower pricesโ€ฆ They were not too bad before that price jump, still not as cheap as the other grey market suppliers but reasonable enough where it was a good place for people to go buy 1 or 2 kits at a time from. But $468 for a kit of KLOW, who could really afford that, not me I donโ€™t have that kind of cash...

                                  Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                                  RandyR M 2 Replies Last reply
                                  7
                                  • P PeptideEd

                                    @stevepep sorry to have gotten that wrong... I'd missed the second mass/purity tab ๐Ÿ™‚ Now I just have to figure out how to get all the direct QR codes onto my labels and still remain phone scannable on a curved vial surface ๐Ÿ™‚

                                    @pep_researcher I see that now... I am over all super pleased with the test coverage... but a little concerned about the less than 99% purity test from Jashonik.

                                    N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Nuncles
                                    wrote last edited by Nuncles
                                    #46

                                    @PeptideEd If you create tiny url's for the QR code, they can be printed smaller and still be scannable.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • C Commander

                                      I wish Nexaph had lower pricesโ€ฆ They were not too bad before that price jump, still not as cheap as the other grey market suppliers but reasonable enough where it was a good place for people to go buy 1 or 2 kits at a time from. But $468 for a kit of KLOW, who could really afford that, not me I donโ€™t have that kind of cash...

                                      RandyR Offline
                                      RandyR Offline
                                      Randy
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #47

                                      @Commander said:

                                      s the other grey market suppliers but reasonable enough where it was a good place for people to go buy 1 or 2 kits at a time from. But $468 for a kit of KLOW, who could really afford that, not me I donโ€™t have that kind of cash...

                                      yeah the klow price hike is insane. Used to be 178

                                      "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                                      J N 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • RandyR Randy

                                        @Commander said:

                                        s the other grey market suppliers but reasonable enough where it was a good place for people to go buy 1 or 2 kits at a time from. But $468 for a kit of KLOW, who could really afford that, not me I donโ€™t have that kind of cash...

                                        yeah the klow price hike is insane. Used to be 178

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        JtCjEfF
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #48

                                        @Randy Is this due to the recent "China is banning KPV production" scare, or something else?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Stevepep

                                          @PeptideEd I just clicked on the box with the arrow, and it takes you directly to the COA on Janoshiks website

                                          vpepsV Online
                                          vpepsV Online
                                          vpeps
                                          wrote last edited by vpeps
                                          #49

                                          @Stevepep This new 97% tested batch of Tesa is now on EZ and AMP too. I appreciate the honesty too, but the previous batches were tested over 99% at Janoshik. I kind of get used already to see 99+% for the products I buy. There is 99.9% COA from Freedom for the same batch though, but we know there are issues with them. In Nexaph TG group they stated that they looked for "97% purity or more" from the test, so they got what they expected, but there are other products at higher level, and their own previous batches were at 99.7% levels.

                                          attentiion is all you need

                                          N 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better ๐Ÿ’—

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups