Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Vendor Reviews & Orders
  3. My Recent Southern Aminos Order Makes Them Fall From Grace
Prize
Three Pens + Filters & Cartridges
Ends in
11973 entries · 4904 participants
Enter →

My Recent Southern Aminos Order Makes Them Fall From Grace

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vendor Reviews & Orders
southern-aminosreviewqualitymots-c
52 Posts 21 Posters 2.3k Views 2 Watching
My Recent Southern Aminos Order Makes Them Fall From Grace
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • atlas01A Offline
    atlas01A Offline
    atlas01
    wrote last edited by
    #42

    I sense a red banner in your future @southernaminos

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • pep_researcherP Offline
      pep_researcherP Offline
      pep_researcher
      wrote last edited by pep_researcher
      #43

      @southernaminos These are not isolated issues. I bought from you only ONCE NINE MONTHS ago, and even that was a poor experience. You sent me vials whose COA was nowhere traceable on your website or in your own COA library. I reached out to you and you sent me some other COA with DIFFERENT content and purity numbers saying this is the same batch when it was NOT.

      I only bought two vials to test out a new vendor, you failed the test, and so I never bought from you again and so didn't try to escalate (which was good because you clearly don't do a good job in handling escalations).

      1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • E Offline
        E Offline
        Eleanor
        wrote last edited by
        #44

        WTH! A 2nd Update?:

        SOUTHERN AMINOS
        Important Product Label Notice
        MOTS-C 40mg Yellow Cap
        Batch Number Label Correction
        This is a typographical error on the vial label only.
        The error does not affect the contents of the vial, product quality, laboratory testing, or the validity of the Certificate of Analysis.
        We recently identified that a small number of MOTS-C 40mg Yellow Cap vials were shipped with an incorrect batch number printed on the vial label.

        We want to be very clear: this was a typographical labeling error involving the batch number only. It was not a manufacturing issue, product integrity issue, testing issue, or Certificate of Analysis issue.

        The affected vial can still be identified and verified using the QR code on the vial and the Yellow Cap color. The applicable Certificate of Analysis remains valid for the product.

        Important Facts
        ✓ The issue is limited to a typographical error in the batch number printed on the vial label.
        ✓ The error does not affect the product's quality or integrity.
        ✓ The Certificate of Analysis remains valid.
        ✓ The vial can still be verified using its QR code and Yellow Cap color.
        ✓ This does not affect every MOTS-C 40mg Yellow Cap vial.
        ✓ Only a small number of vials shipped prior to the correction were affected.
        Replacement Options
        Although this labeling error does not affect the product itself, we understand that some customers may prefer to have a vial displaying the corrected batch information.

        Unused & Unopened Vials
        If your affected vial is unused and unopened, you may request a replacement vial with the corrected label.
        Opened or Used Vials
        If the vial has already been opened or used, we cannot provide a replacement vial. However, upon request, we can provide you with a corrected replacement label that can be applied to your existing vial.
        Again, this is a labeling typo only.
        It does not change the identity, quality, testing, or Certificate of Analysis associated with the product.
        The labeling issue was corrected as soon as it was identified, and only a limited number of vials shipped before that correction were affected.

        We apologize for any confusion this typographical error may have caused and appreciate your understanding.

        If you have an affected vial and would like to request either an eligible replacement or a corrected label, please contact Southern Aminos Customer Service.

        Southern Aminos
        Products are sold strictly for research purposes only.
        Please refer to our website for applicable policies and product information.

        Proud to be on a gubmint watch list

        pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          Nuncles
          wrote last edited by
          #45

          @eleanor Unless I'm missing something,the second update is not factually correct. The QR code on my vials go to the ILS COA that matches the batch number on the vial, which does not match the yellow cap.

          E 1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • N Nuncles

            @eleanor Unless I'm missing something,the second update is not factually correct. The QR code on my vials go to the ILS COA that matches the batch number on the vial, which does not match the yellow cap.

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Eleanor
            wrote last edited by
            #46

            @Nuncles said:

            @eleanor Unless I'm missing something,the second update is not factually correct. The QR code on my vials go to the ILS COA that matches the batch number on the vial, which does not match the yellow cap.

            I don't know, Nuncles. It's a plethora of BS. This 'typo' mess? Hmm.

            Proud to be on a gubmint watch list

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              Nuncles
              wrote last edited by Nuncles
              #47

              Personally, I think an employee made a simple mistake that's turned into a complicated problem. My guess is that they are still scrambling to find out precisely what happened to exactly which products. I'm not happy with the situation but I'm not crucifying the company for it either. Other people here have that right to do so if they wish. I support them for that right and standing by their convictions.

              E 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • E Eleanor

                WTH! A 2nd Update?:

                SOUTHERN AMINOS
                Important Product Label Notice
                MOTS-C 40mg Yellow Cap
                Batch Number Label Correction
                This is a typographical error on the vial label only.
                The error does not affect the contents of the vial, product quality, laboratory testing, or the validity of the Certificate of Analysis.
                We recently identified that a small number of MOTS-C 40mg Yellow Cap vials were shipped with an incorrect batch number printed on the vial label.

                We want to be very clear: this was a typographical labeling error involving the batch number only. It was not a manufacturing issue, product integrity issue, testing issue, or Certificate of Analysis issue.

                The affected vial can still be identified and verified using the QR code on the vial and the Yellow Cap color. The applicable Certificate of Analysis remains valid for the product.

                Important Facts
                ✓ The issue is limited to a typographical error in the batch number printed on the vial label.
                ✓ The error does not affect the product's quality or integrity.
                ✓ The Certificate of Analysis remains valid.
                ✓ The vial can still be verified using its QR code and Yellow Cap color.
                ✓ This does not affect every MOTS-C 40mg Yellow Cap vial.
                ✓ Only a small number of vials shipped prior to the correction were affected.
                Replacement Options
                Although this labeling error does not affect the product itself, we understand that some customers may prefer to have a vial displaying the corrected batch information.

                Unused & Unopened Vials
                If your affected vial is unused and unopened, you may request a replacement vial with the corrected label.
                Opened or Used Vials
                If the vial has already been opened or used, we cannot provide a replacement vial. However, upon request, we can provide you with a corrected replacement label that can be applied to your existing vial.
                Again, this is a labeling typo only.
                It does not change the identity, quality, testing, or Certificate of Analysis associated with the product.
                The labeling issue was corrected as soon as it was identified, and only a limited number of vials shipped before that correction were affected.

                We apologize for any confusion this typographical error may have caused and appreciate your understanding.

                If you have an affected vial and would like to request either an eligible replacement or a corrected label, please contact Southern Aminos Customer Service.

                Southern Aminos
                Products are sold strictly for research purposes only.
                Please refer to our website for applicable policies and product information.

                pep_researcherP Offline
                pep_researcherP Offline
                pep_researcher
                wrote last edited by pep_researcher
                #48

                @Eleanor lol only that they have been creating these typographical errors many many times. I mentioned my vial, batch ID, and COA story too, from NINE MONTHS ago, same typographical error and missing COAs. Bunch of BS 😂

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • N Nuncles

                  Personally, I think an employee made a simple mistake that's turned into a complicated problem. My guess is that they are still scrambling to find out precisely what happened to exactly which products. I'm not happy with the situation but I'm not crucifying the company for it either. Other people here have that right to do so if they wish. I support them for that right and standing by their convictions.

                  E Offline
                  E Offline
                  Eleanor
                  wrote last edited by
                  #49

                  @Nuncles I agree with you Nuncles, but as in my days in school, it was called 'proofreading'. In the petrol business we called it 'cold eyes'. Since this has happened previously (@pep_researcher ), they should have been particularly careful but even so, their response to the customer leaves much to be desired. I think you handled it well in your review.

                  Proud to be on a gubmint watch list

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Nuncles
                    wrote last edited by
                    #50

                    @pep_researcher @eleanor
                    Both are excellent points. I guess I was too focused on my situation and not the overall big picture. Once is a mistake. More than once is a problem.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                      @Eleanor lol only that they have been creating these typographical errors many many times. I mentioned my vial, batch ID, and COA story too, from NINE MONTHS ago, same typographical error and missing COAs. Bunch of BS 😂

                      S Online
                      S Online
                      Stevepep
                      wrote last edited by
                      #51

                      @pep_researcher it raises a bigger issue on Quality control overall it’s a big stay away right now.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Nuncles
                        wrote last edited by
                        #52

                        I just wanted to provide an update. This is not to change anyone's opinion. This is simply for full transparency for what's going on with my initial post. I emailed Sothern's customer service asking for full clarification of my situation. They emailed back within 3 hours with a very clear and professional response with the appropriate COA for my vials. It was as I expected, the Freedom COA. Hopefully this is a batch that Freedom got accurate. I'm going to recon one of the vials tomorrow. If there are any issues with the recon, I will definitely provide an update. I will be using Hospira Bac Sodium Chloride.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        3

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups