Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Freedom Again
Prize
Three Pens + Filters & Cartridges
Ends in
10286 entries · 4101 participants
Enter →

Freedom Again

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
31 Posts 10 Posters 657 Views 1 Watching
Freedom Again Freedom Again
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Stevepep
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Same Batch

    You are nuts if you buy stuff with their COA. This is from a group buy on the same batch. It was sent to Jano and failed sterility, then sent to Freedom and of course it passed.

    Jano D&O.JPG

    Freedom D&O.JPG

    1 Reply Last reply
    6
    • senex_musS Offline
      senex_musS Offline
      senex_mus
      wrote last edited by senex_mus
      #2

      I think it's possible that both labs are correct.
      possibilities are that the whole batch is not sterile, some of the batch is sterile, or all of it is sterile. Saw in a video that Jano mentioned this, and in my experience makes sense.

      Used to work as a QA analyst for a major drug manufacturing firm. Working and processing the samples from the lophilizing fill wasn't fun. 3 pairs booties, 2 pairs bunny suits, 2 pair head doilies, mask, and space suit hemet with filter. Like working in a plastic bag.

      Watched a video online where a Chinese firm was doing fill. Nice equipment, gowns, then the camera moved a bit and yikes! there was someone in shorts :😱

      I filter. No way without it.

      S RandyR 2 Replies Last reply
      4
      • senex_musS senex_mus

        I think it's possible that both labs are correct.
        possibilities are that the whole batch is not sterile, some of the batch is sterile, or all of it is sterile. Saw in a video that Jano mentioned this, and in my experience makes sense.

        Used to work as a QA analyst for a major drug manufacturing firm. Working and processing the samples from the lophilizing fill wasn't fun. 3 pairs booties, 2 pairs bunny suits, 2 pair head doilies, mask, and space suit hemet with filter. Like working in a plastic bag.

        Watched a video online where a Chinese firm was doing fill. Nice equipment, gowns, then the camera moved a bit and yikes! there was someone in shorts :😱

        I filter. No way without it.

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Stevepep
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @senex_mus what about endotoxins

        senex_musS 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • C Offline
          C Offline
          Commander
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          The question is that freedom’s turnaround time is too quick. Every lab is terribly busy, there is no way they are still doing that much work snd doing it right…

          Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • C Commander

            The question is that freedom’s turnaround time is too quick. Every lab is terribly busy, there is no way they are still doing that much work snd doing it right…

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stevepep
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @Commander also if it was a one off it would be easier to believe but they are consistently bad

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • S Stevepep

              @Commander also if it was a one off it would be easier to believe but they are consistently bad

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Commander
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @Stevepep said:

              @Commander also if it was a one off it would be easier to believe but they are consistently bad

              You are 100% right.

              Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                Nuncles
                wrote last edited by Nuncles
                #7

                I'll probably regret this, but let's play a little devil's advocate.

                You are under the assumption that Jano is the gold standard and never makes mistakes. How do we know with 100% certainty that Jano isn't the one who is wrong and Freedom isn't the lab that is correct? Not taking into consideration past history or COA's. Just looking at the two in front of us.

                S C 2 Replies Last reply
                2
                • senex_musS senex_mus

                  I think it's possible that both labs are correct.
                  possibilities are that the whole batch is not sterile, some of the batch is sterile, or all of it is sterile. Saw in a video that Jano mentioned this, and in my experience makes sense.

                  Used to work as a QA analyst for a major drug manufacturing firm. Working and processing the samples from the lophilizing fill wasn't fun. 3 pairs booties, 2 pairs bunny suits, 2 pair head doilies, mask, and space suit hemet with filter. Like working in a plastic bag.

                  Watched a video online where a Chinese firm was doing fill. Nice equipment, gowns, then the camera moved a bit and yikes! there was someone in shorts :😱

                  I filter. No way without it.

                  RandyR Offline
                  RandyR Offline
                  Randy
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @senex_mus Exactly this

                  Just because one bottle passes sterility doesn't mean the whole batch will. Just because one fails doesn't mean every bottle is contaminated.

                  "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                  S S 2 Replies Last reply
                  2
                  • RandyR Randy

                    @senex_mus Exactly this

                    Just because one bottle passes sterility doesn't mean the whole batch will. Just because one fails doesn't mean every bottle is contaminated.

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Stevepep
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @Randy so here is the question would you order the GBK-cu it’s discounted to like $30? Second observation just like Nexaph you get a bad result and want a good one who do you send it to? These two companies decided Freedom who do you pick?

                    RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Nuncles

                      I'll probably regret this, but let's play a little devil's advocate.

                      You are under the assumption that Jano is the gold standard and never makes mistakes. How do we know with 100% certainty that Jano isn't the one who is wrong and Freedom isn't the lab that is correct? Not taking into consideration past history or COA's. Just looking at the two in front of us.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stevepep
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @Nuncles I think you always have to look at the history unless something changed to fix some obvious issues. Janoshik isn’t perfect but they have the reference standards unlike many other labs and have been the most reliable. They certainly can be wrong but if you asked me to bet the house on who got it right I am saying Janoshik. Let’s hear who you got?

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Nuncles

                        I'll probably regret this, but let's play a little devil's advocate.

                        You are under the assumption that Jano is the gold standard and never makes mistakes. How do we know with 100% certainty that Jano isn't the one who is wrong and Freedom isn't the lab that is correct? Not taking into consideration past history or COA's. Just looking at the two in front of us.

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        Commander
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @Nuncles said:

                        I'll probably regret this, but let's play a little devil's advocate.

                        You are under the assumption that Jano is the gold standard and never makes mistakes. How do we know with 100% certainty that Jano isn't the one who is wrong and Freedom isn't the lab that is correct? Not taking into consideration past history or COA's. Just looking at the two in front of us.

                        I agree with you in part. Jano can definitely make mistakes. What I am saying is there is no way that Freedom is doing that amount of load in the same time there were doing it with a lighter load. They couldn’t have tooled up and staffed up that quick. That with the fact of a bunch of other failures in the recent past. If it looks like a duck….

                        Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • S Stevepep

                          @Nuncles I think you always have to look at the history unless something changed to fix some obvious issues. Janoshik isn’t perfect but they have the reference standards unlike many other labs and have been the most reliable. They certainly can be wrong but if you asked me to bet the house on who got it right I am saying Janoshik. Let’s hear who you got?

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          mikebricker
                          wrote last edited by mikebricker
                          #12

                          @Stevepep I’m pretty sure that a lab won’t confirm an ID without reference material. I know the lab that I use won’t. I even asked if they’d test Eloralintide and Cartalax for me. I was told they didn’t have the reference standards yet for those two so no can do.
                          I asked how about just confirming the molecular weight of the Elora? Nope. What I get from that is that no self respecting lab that wants to stay in business will confirm samples without the proper reference standards.
                          In fact, my lab recently started including the reference trace with the sample trace…. See the chromatogram and mass traces for a recent Retatrutide sample. The sample is directly above the reference.

                          a007e180-c760-42ee-9538-2aef1eb9ce3f-image.jpeg

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • RandyR Randy

                            @senex_mus Exactly this

                            Just because one bottle passes sterility doesn't mean the whole batch will. Just because one fails doesn't mean every bottle is contaminated.

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Superpep
                            wrote last edited by Superpep
                            #13

                            @Randy Does that mean these sterility tests are pretty much pointless since they don't guarantee the vial you have is sterile?

                            senex_musS RandyR M 3 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • M mikebricker

                              @Stevepep I’m pretty sure that a lab won’t confirm an ID without reference material. I know the lab that I use won’t. I even asked if they’d test Eloralintide and Cartalax for me. I was told they didn’t have the reference standards yet for those two so no can do.
                              I asked how about just confirming the molecular weight of the Elora? Nope. What I get from that is that no self respecting lab that wants to stay in business will confirm samples without the proper reference standards.
                              In fact, my lab recently started including the reference trace with the sample trace…. See the chromatogram and mass traces for a recent Retatrutide sample. The sample is directly above the reference.

                              a007e180-c760-42ee-9538-2aef1eb9ce3f-image.jpeg

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Stevepep
                              wrote last edited by Stevepep
                              #14

                              @mikebricker most labs have them for glp’s they are cheap and readily available, when it comes to things like Tesa, SS31 etc they are expensive and harder to get at 100pct. Labs also keep their own standards to test against them and build a catalogue. There are few that can afford them once you get passed things like Reta. That’s not the one to worry about

                              Do you have any from your lab showing these other peptides that would be great to see. I actually think this would be great for labs to show this on everything they test. Some of these standards run 6 to 10 grand that’s a lot of tests at $100 a test. Reta is like $1500 for a standard much more palpable

                              M 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Stevepep

                                @mikebricker most labs have them for glp’s they are cheap and readily available, when it comes to things like Tesa, SS31 etc they are expensive and harder to get at 100pct. Labs also keep their own standards to test against them and build a catalogue. There are few that can afford them once you get passed things like Reta. That’s not the one to worry about

                                Do you have any from your lab showing these other peptides that would be great to see. I actually think this would be great for labs to show this on everything they test. Some of these standards run 6 to 10 grand that’s a lot of tests at $100 a test. Reta is like $1500 for a standard much more palpable

                                M Offline
                                M Offline
                                mikebricker
                                wrote last edited by mikebricker
                                #15

                                @Stevepep They’ve always showed the Chromatogram and Mass traces. On all their samples.
                                Just recently they started including the reference mass traces under the sample traces.
                                Here’s two more recent. MOTSc and a GHK-Cu/KPV blend.
                                a9ba80c8-56ca-4823-ae74-c6f88ddbc7c4-image.jpeg

                                e1d90691-416a-4866-9175-aa5e90eed134-image.jpeg

                                SS-31 without reference trace.
                                dbce07a5-1699-4e31-bd96-7902e082200d-image.jpeg

                                PS., you know which lab these are from…. 😉

                                S 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Stevepep

                                  @senex_mus what about endotoxins

                                  senex_musS Offline
                                  senex_musS Offline
                                  senex_mus
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @Stevepep endotoxins come along with bacteria, and without bacteria. So, unfortunately, back to same conclusion, some samples with, some without, although my guess is that contaminated vials will test positive for endotoxin more often.

                                  Can't give a firm opinion, didn't work in the endo lab or the final testing lab. Worked testing the environments. The fill was one of them.

                                  ?Perhaps someone here has experience in an endo lab?

                                  When I interviewed for the job, they showed me a part of the endo lab where they kept the rabbits. They'd dose them and to check for pyrogens, monitor their temperatures via a probe up the rabbits rear end... They ask me what I thought, and being a kinda off color guy, I said "Oh, it'll be great when someone ask me what I do for work... I probe rabbits" and laughed.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Superpep

                                    @Randy Does that mean these sterility tests are pretty much pointless since they don't guarantee the vial you have is sterile?

                                    senex_musS Offline
                                    senex_musS Offline
                                    senex_mus
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @Superpep I think your odds of getting sterile vials increase if the sterility test passed; conversely, I wouldn't order from a batch where I knew a vial had failed.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Superpep

                                      @Randy Does that mean these sterility tests are pretty much pointless since they don't guarantee the vial you have is sterile?

                                      RandyR Offline
                                      RandyR Offline
                                      Randy
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @Superpep no because its more likely the whole batch is yucky than just a small portion of it.

                                      That being said - This is why we filter.

                                      "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Stevepep

                                        @Randy so here is the question would you order the GBK-cu it’s discounted to like $30? Second observation just like Nexaph you get a bad result and want a good one who do you send it to? These two companies decided Freedom who do you pick?

                                        RandyR Offline
                                        RandyR Offline
                                        Randy
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @Stevepep no. I wouldnt touch that.

                                        If i got a bad result and wanted a good one I would use an LLM to spin up a website for my lab Fancy Test Analytical and have it generate a ton of COA's.

                                        I wouldnt do that though. I would just throw it away.

                                        "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • M mikebricker

                                          @Stevepep They’ve always showed the Chromatogram and Mass traces. On all their samples.
                                          Just recently they started including the reference mass traces under the sample traces.
                                          Here’s two more recent. MOTSc and a GHK-Cu/KPV blend.
                                          a9ba80c8-56ca-4823-ae74-c6f88ddbc7c4-image.jpeg

                                          e1d90691-416a-4866-9175-aa5e90eed134-image.jpeg

                                          SS-31 without reference trace.
                                          dbce07a5-1699-4e31-bd96-7902e082200d-image.jpeg

                                          PS., you know which lab these are from…. 😉

                                          S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Stevepep
                                          wrote last edited by Stevepep
                                          #20

                                          @mikebricker I like it now if they could just get an accurate measurement of quantity they might be on to something.

                                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups