Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Discussion: We Bought Eloralintide. Then the Lab Results Stopped Adding Up.
Prize
Three Pens + Filters & Cartridges
Ends in
11916 entries · 4870 participants
Enter →

Discussion: We Bought Eloralintide. Then the Lab Results Stopped Adding Up.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
23 Posts 10 Posters 434 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M mikebricker

    @Stevepep That AFI that the Critic uses seems to be on the ball….
    If I just wanted PPID on a Janoshik sample, what would it cost?

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Stevepep
    wrote last edited by Stevepep
    #6

    @mikebricker $300 plus about $30 in shipping costs. I sent Krause two samples yesterday you got me after all those posts. One is from a Peptegridy batch I am in a group test on testing at Jano so we can compare. Krause is $125 which is so cheap. As you know, it's a bit cumbersome and antiquated, and the testing timeline is long, but for $125 I figured I would give it a shot. I had been using Kovera a bunch I am 15 samples deep with them. Great system, very easy to use, and their dashboard is the best I have seen. They are $200. $180 for more than one sample. Results with them take about 3 days. They have been accurate against the manufacturer's Jano COA's from Grey so far. But if Krause is close, it's far cheaper and I am keeping an open mind.

    On a side note I think you were in the Peptegridy group buy with the third party Freedom 36% purity on Reta 10. They went off on Freedom and are getting it tested at other labs. I have my popcorn ready for this one.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • S Stevepep

      @mikebricker $300 plus about $30 in shipping costs. I sent Krause two samples yesterday you got me after all those posts. One is from a Peptegridy batch I am in a group test on testing at Jano so we can compare. Krause is $125 which is so cheap. As you know, it's a bit cumbersome and antiquated, and the testing timeline is long, but for $125 I figured I would give it a shot. I had been using Kovera a bunch I am 15 samples deep with them. Great system, very easy to use, and their dashboard is the best I have seen. They are $200. $180 for more than one sample. Results with them take about 3 days. They have been accurate against the manufacturer's Jano COA's from Grey so far. But if Krause is close, it's far cheaper and I am keeping an open mind.

      On a side note I think you were in the Peptegridy group buy with the third party Freedom 36% purity on Reta 10. They went off on Freedom and are getting it tested at other labs. I have my popcorn ready for this one.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      mikebricker
      wrote last edited by mikebricker
      #7

      @Stevepep Wasn’t in that group buy. Krause is $125 for one sample. If you sent two samples, it’s $95 each. For 2-5 it’s $95 and over 5 it’s $80. Yes it takes about 2 weeks. But that’s not too bad….

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M mikebricker

        @Stevepep Wasn’t in that group buy. Krause is $125 for one sample. If you sent two samples, it’s $95 each. For 2-5 it’s $95 and over 5 it’s $80. Yes it takes about 2 weeks. But that’s not too bad….

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Stevepep
        wrote last edited by Stevepep
        #8

        @mikebricker looking forward to seeing the results, timeline etc. unfortunately I have no pricing other than the $125 they apparently invoice you after receipt. I will post my experience good, bad or average once I complete the experience like I have for other labs. Also we will have a Janoshik test to compare it too. So we will get a first hand comparison as well

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • S Stevepep

          @mikebricker looking forward to seeing the results, timeline etc. unfortunately I have no pricing other than the $125 they apparently invoice you after receipt. I will post my experience good, bad or average once I complete the experience like I have for other labs. Also we will have a Janoshik test to compare it too. So we will get a first hand comparison as well

          M Offline
          M Offline
          mikebricker
          wrote last edited by mikebricker
          #9

          @Stevepep Excellent. Looking forward to it.

          f909cd85-0459-4e9b-8e48-50661145f568-image.jpeg

          They no longer charge additional to include the photo.

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • pep_researcherP Offline
            pep_researcherP Offline
            pep_researcher
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            @peptidecritic @randy FWIW on Dustin's point of inconsistent vial quantities in the same manufacturing run — I remember seeing a Vanguard COA on a stateside vendor who tested multiple vials from the same batch and did have quantities varying between 28mg to 35mg. It was probably Reta.

            I didn't buy seeing that much variation, and so don't have the COA in my folder, else would have shared it. Curious if Vanguard got the results from another lab on their exact vial and what was the number?

            Regardless, THIS is the reason I like Peptide Critic and read this forum 🙂

            mmpM 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

              @peptidecritic @randy FWIW on Dustin's point of inconsistent vial quantities in the same manufacturing run — I remember seeing a Vanguard COA on a stateside vendor who tested multiple vials from the same batch and did have quantities varying between 28mg to 35mg. It was probably Reta.

              I didn't buy seeing that much variation, and so don't have the COA in my folder, else would have shared it. Curious if Vanguard got the results from another lab on their exact vial and what was the number?

              Regardless, THIS is the reason I like Peptide Critic and read this forum 🙂

              mmpM Online
              mmpM Online
              mmp
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @pep_researcher

              Probably they will not disclose their round robin results.

              pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M mikebricker

                Looks like it’s time for the members to boycott Vanguard.

                I want to buy a box of the Chengdu Elora, but now I’m confused over what the 10mg vials have? 10? 11? 12? Seems a good move would be to use 11 in my dosing.

                Also, that has to be the most tested batch in history. At least we know the purity…

                RandyR Offline
                RandyR Offline
                Randy
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @mikebricker go look at our multilab comparison article where we sent reta to the same labs. https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/why-test-results-vary-between-labs-multi-lab-coa-comparison

                This is an 11mg average batch. Thats how it works in this space. We tested the nexaph bottles of elora at afi and vanguard and got lower numbers than jano.

                Plus/minus 10% is kind of the norm. much more than that and we start asking questions and paying for more testing 😉

                Vanguard dropped the ball here. Human error happens. Even to the best labs.

                "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • S Stevepep

                  Why can’t we just get a lab to be accurate on everything it’s Jano or bust at this point

                  RandyR Offline
                  RandyR Offline
                  Randy
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @Stevepep jano has made mistakes too. We need robots running the tests.

                  "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                  S pep_researcherP 2 Replies Last reply
                  3
                  • RandyR Randy

                    @mikebricker go look at our multilab comparison article where we sent reta to the same labs. https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/why-test-results-vary-between-labs-multi-lab-coa-comparison

                    This is an 11mg average batch. Thats how it works in this space. We tested the nexaph bottles of elora at afi and vanguard and got lower numbers than jano.

                    Plus/minus 10% is kind of the norm. much more than that and we start asking questions and paying for more testing 😉

                    Vanguard dropped the ball here. Human error happens. Even to the best labs.

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    mikebricker
                    wrote last edited by mikebricker
                    #14

                    @Randy Thanks. Appreciate the info. I ran QA for a Navy Nuclear Submarine maintenance facility for a few years when I was active duty. QC is just as important as QA. Looks like Vanguard thought they had the QA but dropped the ball on QC with these samples. They need to do fact finding to determine the root cause of their SNAFU.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • RandyR Randy

                      @Stevepep jano has made mistakes too. We need robots running the tests.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stevepep
                      wrote last edited by Stevepep
                      #15

                      @Randy said:

                      @Stevepep jano has made mistakes too. We need robots running the tests.

                      Totally, it’s maddening none of these labs can be consistent. The QA is non existent. You need process and oversight which none of them seem to have

                      Mr Musk help us out please

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Offline
                        P Offline
                        pure_pep
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        Why didn't anyone actually test the same vials that vanguard offered to send them of the samples that tested high? That seems like it would have actually provided you a useful data point and would have saved you money in testing.

                        RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • mmpM mmp

                          @pep_researcher

                          Probably they will not disclose their round robin results.

                          pep_researcherP Offline
                          pep_researcherP Offline
                          pep_researcher
                          wrote last edited by
                          #17

                          @mmp Dustin's message says they sent vials to BT labs as only BT accepted their offer.

                          I guess it's always going to be a gamble in any wellness research space and that includes even big brothers and so called official channels too.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • P pure_pep

                            Why didn't anyone actually test the same vials that vanguard offered to send them of the samples that tested high? That seems like it would have actually provided you a useful data point and would have saved you money in testing.

                            RandyR Offline
                            RandyR Offline
                            Randy
                            wrote last edited by
                            #18

                            @pure_pep they offered them to another lab.

                            This was a dilution calculation error by vanguard. I've seen similar fuckups by them and EVERY OTHER LAB in the space.

                            "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            4
                            • RandyR Randy

                              @Stevepep jano has made mistakes too. We need robots running the tests.

                              pep_researcherP Offline
                              pep_researcherP Offline
                              pep_researcher
                              wrote last edited by
                              #19

                              @Randy said:

                              We need robots running the tests

                              💯 Agreed.

                              Instead they are using AI for making stupid Instagram memes and deep fake videos. This is a race to the bottom for tech.

                              I'm in tech and often have "pulling my hair out" moments seeing their misguided focus in what to apply it to. 😞

                              vpepsV 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                                @Randy said:

                                We need robots running the tests

                                💯 Agreed.

                                Instead they are using AI for making stupid Instagram memes and deep fake videos. This is a race to the bottom for tech.

                                I'm in tech and often have "pulling my hair out" moments seeing their misguided focus in what to apply it to. 😞

                                vpepsV Offline
                                vpepsV Offline
                                vpeps
                                wrote last edited by
                                #20

                                @pep_researcher Not fair. The labs also use AI to generate fishy explanations of why they tested 150% the amount of the content (which is seen from a different font and spelling errors in few sentences they actually used a human to write).

                                attentiion is all you need

                                pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • vpepsV vpeps

                                  @pep_researcher Not fair. The labs also use AI to generate fishy explanations of why they tested 150% the amount of the content (which is seen from a different font and spelling errors in few sentences they actually used a human to write).

                                  pep_researcherP Offline
                                  pep_researcherP Offline
                                  pep_researcher
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #21

                                  @vpeps 😂 Yeah so that's not right either. I meant robots to do precise dilutions is okay, but labs using LLM apps to hallucinate on test reports is not okay — that AI use is strict no no. Hehe

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mmpM mmp

                                    It’s clear that nothing is clear 😃
                                    Vanguard will not admit the mistake

                                    I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    Iggypopsicle
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #22

                                    Clear as Mud

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Jake_PepTronJ Offline
                                      Jake_PepTronJ Offline
                                      Jake_PepTron
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #23

                                      Pray for the vials tested on Fridays.

                                      Remember: there are no peptides that can fill the emptiness inside your cold heart.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0

                                      Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                      Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                      With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                      Register Login
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups