Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Discussion: We Bought Eloralintide. Then the Lab Results Stopped Adding Up.
Prize
Three Pens + Filters & Cartridges
Ends in
11916 entries · 4870 participants
Enter →

Discussion: We Bought Eloralintide. Then the Lab Results Stopped Adding Up.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
23 Posts 10 Posters 433 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

    @peptidecritic @randy FWIW on Dustin's point of inconsistent vial quantities in the same manufacturing run β€” I remember seeing a Vanguard COA on a stateside vendor who tested multiple vials from the same batch and did have quantities varying between 28mg to 35mg. It was probably Reta.

    I didn't buy seeing that much variation, and so don't have the COA in my folder, else would have shared it. Curious if Vanguard got the results from another lab on their exact vial and what was the number?

    Regardless, THIS is the reason I like Peptide Critic and read this forum πŸ™‚

    mmpM Online
    mmpM Online
    mmp
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @pep_researcher

    Probably they will not disclose their round robin results.

    pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M mikebricker

      Looks like it’s time for the members to boycott Vanguard.

      I want to buy a box of the Chengdu Elora, but now I’m confused over what the 10mg vials have? 10? 11? 12? Seems a good move would be to use 11 in my dosing.

      Also, that has to be the most tested batch in history. At least we know the purity…

      RandyR Offline
      RandyR Offline
      Randy
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      @mikebricker go look at our multilab comparison article where we sent reta to the same labs. https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/why-test-results-vary-between-labs-multi-lab-coa-comparison

      This is an 11mg average batch. Thats how it works in this space. We tested the nexaph bottles of elora at afi and vanguard and got lower numbers than jano.

      Plus/minus 10% is kind of the norm. much more than that and we start asking questions and paying for more testing πŸ˜‰

      Vanguard dropped the ball here. Human error happens. Even to the best labs.

      "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • S Stevepep

        Why can’t we just get a lab to be accurate on everything it’s Jano or bust at this point

        RandyR Offline
        RandyR Offline
        Randy
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @Stevepep jano has made mistakes too. We need robots running the tests.

        "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

        S pep_researcherP 2 Replies Last reply
        3
        • RandyR Randy

          @mikebricker go look at our multilab comparison article where we sent reta to the same labs. https://peptidecritic.com/lab-report/why-test-results-vary-between-labs-multi-lab-coa-comparison

          This is an 11mg average batch. Thats how it works in this space. We tested the nexaph bottles of elora at afi and vanguard and got lower numbers than jano.

          Plus/minus 10% is kind of the norm. much more than that and we start asking questions and paying for more testing πŸ˜‰

          Vanguard dropped the ball here. Human error happens. Even to the best labs.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          mikebricker
          wrote last edited by mikebricker
          #14

          @Randy Thanks. Appreciate the info. I ran QA for a Navy Nuclear Submarine maintenance facility for a few years when I was active duty. QC is just as important as QA. Looks like Vanguard thought they had the QA but dropped the ball on QC with these samples. They need to do fact finding to determine the root cause of their SNAFU.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • RandyR Randy

            @Stevepep jano has made mistakes too. We need robots running the tests.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stevepep
            wrote last edited by Stevepep
            #15

            @Randy said:

            @Stevepep jano has made mistakes too. We need robots running the tests.

            Totally, it’s maddening none of these labs can be consistent. The QA is non existent. You need process and oversight which none of them seem to have

            Mr Musk help us out please

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Offline
              P Offline
              pure_pep
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              Why didn't anyone actually test the same vials that vanguard offered to send them of the samples that tested high? That seems like it would have actually provided you a useful data point and would have saved you money in testing.

              RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • mmpM mmp

                @pep_researcher

                Probably they will not disclose their round robin results.

                pep_researcherP Offline
                pep_researcherP Offline
                pep_researcher
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @mmp Dustin's message says they sent vials to BT labs as only BT accepted their offer.

                I guess it's always going to be a gamble in any wellness research space and that includes even big brothers and so called official channels too.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • P pure_pep

                  Why didn't anyone actually test the same vials that vanguard offered to send them of the samples that tested high? That seems like it would have actually provided you a useful data point and would have saved you money in testing.

                  RandyR Offline
                  RandyR Offline
                  Randy
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @pure_pep they offered them to another lab.

                  This was a dilution calculation error by vanguard. I've seen similar fuckups by them and EVERY OTHER LAB in the space.

                  "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  4
                  • RandyR Randy

                    @Stevepep jano has made mistakes too. We need robots running the tests.

                    pep_researcherP Offline
                    pep_researcherP Offline
                    pep_researcher
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @Randy said:

                    We need robots running the tests

                    πŸ’― Agreed.

                    Instead they are using AI for making stupid Instagram memes and deep fake videos. This is a race to the bottom for tech.

                    I'm in tech and often have "pulling my hair out" moments seeing their misguided focus in what to apply it to. 😞

                    vpepsV 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                      @Randy said:

                      We need robots running the tests

                      πŸ’― Agreed.

                      Instead they are using AI for making stupid Instagram memes and deep fake videos. This is a race to the bottom for tech.

                      I'm in tech and often have "pulling my hair out" moments seeing their misguided focus in what to apply it to. 😞

                      vpepsV Offline
                      vpepsV Offline
                      vpeps
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @pep_researcher Not fair. The labs also use AI to generate fishy explanations of why they tested 150% the amount of the content (which is seen from a different font and spelling errors in few sentences they actually used a human to write).

                      attentiion is all you need

                      pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • vpepsV vpeps

                        @pep_researcher Not fair. The labs also use AI to generate fishy explanations of why they tested 150% the amount of the content (which is seen from a different font and spelling errors in few sentences they actually used a human to write).

                        pep_researcherP Offline
                        pep_researcherP Offline
                        pep_researcher
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        @vpeps πŸ˜‚ Yeah so that's not right either. I meant robots to do precise dilutions is okay, but labs using LLM apps to hallucinate on test reports is not okay β€” that AI use is strict no no. Hehe

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mmpM mmp

                          It’s clear that nothing is clear πŸ˜ƒ
                          Vanguard will not admit the mistake

                          I Offline
                          I Offline
                          Iggypopsicle
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          Clear as Mud

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Jake_PepTronJ Offline
                            Jake_PepTronJ Offline
                            Jake_PepTron
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            Pray for the vials tested on Fridays.

                            Remember: there are no peptides that can fill the emptiness inside your cold heart.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0

                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                            With your input, this post could be even better πŸ’—

                            Register Login
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups