https://copsandbloggers.blogspot.com/2008/04/jason-allen-jack-beeching-hitcher-most.html

"Chamberlain. Because of his past, the sheriff’s office just suspects he’s up to no good". (from 2008)

Who do you suppose is promoting Certified Peps so highly?

Paid for press release:
https://finance.yahoo.com/healthcare/articles/honest-peptide-review-brings-transparency-120000409.html

https://honestpeptidereview.com/

That review site looks very fake.

There isn't a meme or emoji strong enough to describe my feelings about a surgeon pricking themselves twice during the same surgery in a place where AIDS is rampant. Maybe a or a or a

What led to you being in an OR in rural West Africa? That gets another or maybe a

Nice work and sorry you had to sacrifice an entire bottle of Hospira. I've heard that Lambda BAC water has consistently passed pH and benzyl alcohol testing just in case someone needs another source.

Safety message:
Every time I saw you recap needles I held my breath. I recap needles with one hand behind my back, then snap the cap on with that hand when the needle is covered. It's safer to cut the needle using a sharps container if one is available and you're not making videos.

Except for a puncture wound you're safe with injecting BAC water, but it's a bad habit to cover/recap needles using two hands unless you've got no other choice.

I worked in the medical field. Needlestick injuries with exposure to human fluids usually meant being next in line for an infectious disease evaluation and a Hep B immune globulin shot. Fun times.

BAC water or peptide needlestick injuries aren't going to send you to Urgent Care. It's just that puncture wounds in your thumb hurt.

@newenough Your title isn't accurate. The journalist didn't prove peptides work. He never talked about using them himself or the results of other researchers using them.
All he proved was that the peptides were present in the vials he received when he had them tested.
But thanks for posting the video. It was fun and interesting to watch.

@volume-1 If there is a third-party COA I wouldn't find it necessary to send a vial for testing. If there are rumors of sketchy things going on I would probably skip that vendor. Why? Testing is expensive ($200-300+) not counting your sacrifice of one vial.

IMHO doing your own testing only makes sense when you are sharing the cost with other people or you are buying enough kits on your own to justify the cost.

For anyone who is a newbie here are some other things to watch for:

• Some vendors will swear to god they do third-party testing but if you search their website you won't find ANY COAs anywhere. Or they post two or three and hope you won't notice the other 17 or 18 that are missing when they're selling 20 SKUs.

• Be sure the lab IS a third-party lab and not their own in-house lab. Look for a business name at the top or bottom. No business name on the COA? Hahahaha... excuse me while I go make some COAs for my friends

Some vendors will be up-front and tell you they do their own in-house testing. Unless they ALSO do third-party testing I wouldn't trust their in-house COAs.

• Be sure to check the date on the COA. It can be anywhere on the form. I would definitely pass on anything over a year old. I would probably pass on anything older than 8 months because there is a good chance there is a vendor out there with a fresher product. A peptide can degrade over time even while frozen for several years.