Peptide Critic Community

This is a vendor review submitted by kj4otu on PeptideCritic.com.

Rating: (5/5)

Review

I ordered Mots-c, TB-500, BPC-157, Semax, and KPV. Had content, purity, endo, and sterility tests posted for each batch. 2 day shipping. Vials come with labels with qr code and written batch numbers - matched the website. Peps worked for my wombat testing great. Will buy again.

Read the full review: Quick Shipping, Tests posted, Decent price, Good selection

Discuss this review, share your own experiences, or ask questions about the vendor.

Please keep discussions respectful and factual.

Figured I would say HI. I have started researching with my wombat using GLP3.

Only 5 weeks in and there has been a 6% weight loss in him. There has ben a 5% drop in waist/belly measurement (visceral fat indicator). This has started a chain reaction of physiological changes including a drastic reduction in sleep apnea episodes, cessation of snoring, more energy, etc. The apnea reduction has caused pulse and BP drops into Orthostatic Hypotension, leading us to begin reducing the ACE inhibitor and beta-blocker we were researching for the last three years.

A side note, the lab work done before starting GLP3 research led to finding high ferritin (iron) levels, also caused by metabolism stress to the liver (compensation for high insulin resistance), that are being dealt with by phlebotomy and are rapidly resolving as well. Lastly, lab tests comparing A1C and hemoglobin from now to 5 weeks ago show marked improvement in both. All good things!

@peptidecritic main description of Nexaph says "rigorous third-party testing (identity, purity, and cleanliness checks)". I have been unable to find anything but COA's showing purity and identity. Have they changed their testing since your review or am I missing or just not looking in the right place for the cleanliness part of their COA's?

I've always assumed there was variation in vials. Most tests I see posted on vendor sites using have 2-3 vial testing show the variation, although not always this much. I think we would see this much more if we were to, for example, send a batch of 10-20 vials to be tested. Honestly, my concerns are 1: the active chemical is what is is supposed to be. 2. Sterility and endotoxins. 3. Purity. Granted they all matter, but folks taking content and purity COA's as a stamp that the stuff is safe to inject is a terrible trend IMO.

I love actual logical science when dealing with peps! I thank you and my wombat thanks you!