So I dont understand. Their COA is visibly published on the site and you bought the Tirz knowing the results of COA. Why didnt you ask those questions before you bought the product?

Any way we can add a feature to filter vendors based on testing? Maybe a badge next to a vendor that does 7x testing, 5x testing etc so we can filter based on that

It’s easy to slap a label on a peptide vial, send it out for testing, and sell it. I don’t think any vendor is really lacking the ability to do that.

What I think separates vendors, though, isn’t just the products themselves. It’s their customer service, how they handle challenging inquiries, their demeanor and attitude toward customers, and how they resolve issues in a way that leaves both sides satisfied.

We always talk about which vendors have the best products, but in your opinion, which vendor really goes above and beyond when it comes to customer service and handling problems or difficult situations?

Are those your labels that you put on there or was that from nexaph?

@mmp You reconstitute it then run it through filter and removes organisms but wont touch endotoxin tho

@Stevepep Who is to say what the standard should even be? IMO, a lot of these tests are pointless.

Janoshik himself has said he has never come across a failed heavy metal test. This is a lab testing thousands of peptides. What exactly are we accomplishing by continuing to test for it?

I’m all for conformity and endotoxin testing because those can actually tell us something useful about the product. But sterility testing is another one I’m iffy about

I could lyophilize a peptide under absolutely horrible conditions with zero regard for sterility, then run the finished product through a sterile filter and send it off for testing immediately. The sterility test could come back with zero microbial growth.

But does that prove the peptide was produced under sterile conditions? Not really.

At the end of the day, the test is only telling you whether microorganisms were detected in that particular sample at that particular point in time. It doesn't necessarily tell you anything about how the product was manufactured or whether contamination occurred earlier in the process.

We need to ask ourselves what these tests are actually designed to prove, rather than just assuming that more testing automatically means a better or safer product.

@Stevepep 100% agree with you

@Stevepep

To each their own. Ive bought numerous peptides from various vendors that don't do all the testing including Genpeptide. I had no issues with the quality of their product.

Nexaph 20% off all peptides. Extra 5% if you use crypto

Figured I'd start a thread to consolidate all the deals here for Labor Day weekend

Glow Aminos
$0–$299: 35% OFF
$300–$399: 45% OFF
$400+: 50% OFF
Can be stacked with current coupons

EZPeptides
30% off all peptides site wide. Can stack with peptidecritic coupon for total 40%

Genpeptide
40% Off all peptides using coupon LABOR40

@Commander Its the verb version of Suspicion used by GENZ people. So rather than saying Suspicioning its Sussing

@Snake-Pepskin at one point Nexaph literally had a link at the top of their page pointing to EZP as their single vial vendor

@Stevepep wrong. They do not manufacture in the U.S. They lyopholize. They source all the raw powder from China and then lyopholize it here in the U.S