Peptide Critic Community

@ogsteve foundation first agree. I have the same issue with so much pinning. Anything for one less pin. Keep us posted on the journey.

@Randy I just used Google AI. I have an appointment on the 25th of this month to hopefully get both shoulders cleaned out. Barbotage procedure. For now I have stopped all peptides. Except Reta. I can’t really workout right now and I am not gaining my weight back! Oh and yeah, I am on the older side. 52. It’s a weird space to be in. I’m not old but not young and trying to accept the aging process and its effects. I was taking the glow stack to fix my left shoulder and ended up with shoulder pain on my right. I guess this is what I get.

ILS uploaded a bad COA last week and said that Tirzepitide was something completely different. Then an hour later corrected it and said it was 99.8% Tirz but then added a completely different photo than the one that was taken of the actual product. No apologies, no phone call to discuss, no refund for the 3 weeks of waiting and total lack of faith in the final COA for the test group. Nothing. They are a mess and in over their heads.

@derekg1 ...at best a 3/5...for wasting my time. I loathe having to always sign up to view an inventory that doesn't come close to competing with my go to vendors. SLU-PP-332 products either no COA, or ILS which is worse. Vit B and some other products also claim testing without proof. Not a great product selection when many are untested. Had high hopes because their SLU-PP-332 capsules were more than 30% per mg cheaper than EZP. If they weren't deceitful by claiming tested products without proof, or at best, trying do business without having everything in order first; I might have given them a second look down the road. Sad that good business practices in the U.S. have become the exception rather than the norm.

This is the official discussion thread for a vendor on PeptideCritic.com. View the vendor profile: Lone Star Scientific Share your experiences with this vendor, ask questions, or add information that might help other community members. Please keep discussions respectful and factual.

Great poem

@Randy said: yeah. waiting on some bubble packing for them. Awesome. Sounds good. Ill wait. Thanks for getting back to me.

@SpaceGhost said: Went to the ER last night. They admitted me, saying gall stones and pancreatitis. Disclosing peptides research to the doctor will be fun . Any suggestions? Knew it. Lol. Your description was all too familiar.

I have been very happy with Nexaph. I will have to buy some stuff from BLL next time there is a big sale, but for now I will stock up a bit more. It sure beats the prices of vendors I was buying from before I discovered this lovely community last year. And yeah, I see the discount now. Sweet! (Don’t tell my wife!)

@Stevepep Awsome! MOTS-C and Carbs = Beast mode!

@bfuller damn son you may just be crazier than me

I just ordered Cerebrolysin and Adamax. I would like to read actual experiences with these peptides. I'm still using Semax and Selank nasal. What's the efficacy? Do they have a rapid onset like semax and selank?

@pep_researcher There seems to be quite a few from the exploring peptides community on Skool that seemed to like them. My research went fine with the products I ordered, even though the COA was outdated about six months I realized, after the fact

@MyB OK thank you. Good information

Interview available on youtube or rumble...based on the book, The Needle's Secret “…explains a whole lot of pathology by just doing the injections wrong…” The interview does not address peptides directly, but a fascinating science behind the common sense of inject slowly.

Theres a round spring loaded retaining ring at the base of the rod that the cartridge depresses. Push on that and wiggle the threaded part to release it.

@pep_researcher 100% agree! It’s concerning, they promote a vendor, get a kickback but delete anything negative about a vendor they are affiliated with, that’s where I lose faith/trust in what they are peddling and their honesty

@mjbouffard said: I wish somebody would have a few batches tested with more advanced methods just to see what the general results are. Right now, most of us rely on HPLC and LC-MS testing. Those tests are very important—they tell us how pure the peptide is and confirm it’s the correct peptide based on its molecular weight. But they don’t guarantee that the peptide will actually bind to its receptor and produce the expected biological effect. Think of it like a key. It can be made from the right material and have the right weight, but if the shape is even slightly off, it may not fit the lock. The only way to know whether a peptide actually activates its target receptor is through functional (cell-based) testing or specialized structural testing. I’m not saying the peptides we’re using don’t work. I just think it would be interesting to see a few batches tested beyond the standard HPLC and LC-MS so we have a better idea of what we’re actually getting. "The only way to know whether a peptide actually activates its target receptor is through functional (cell-based) testing or specialized structural testing." My 186 pounds lost might disagree. With that said if you are looking more testing that someone is you my friend. Lol

@coondogesq The cap color is the same on two different peptides. BPC and KPV kind of a red flag