Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community

Peptide Critic Community

  1. Randy the Rats Research Forum
  2. Vendor Reviews & Orders
  3. Nexaph CJC/Ipa Test Results - A Lot Lower Than Janoshik’s
Prize
Enter to Win a Gansulin Auto Injector Pen, with Carts a Pepboys Vial Storage Case
Ends in
6068 entries · 1000 participants
Enter →

Nexaph CJC/Ipa Test Results - A Lot Lower Than Janoshik’s

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vendor Reviews & Orders
nexaphcjc-1295-ipamorelin
16 Posts 5 Posters 86 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Commander
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    The SNP Telegram group just booted me for posting those results.
    I am starting to realize that too many people in these Telegram groups and boards have a vested interest not to have clear transparent information out there. I mean arguing with me about a test report is crazy.
    It is simple, we always say test your peptides, but why would we do that if we simply didn’t believe the results that we got or didn’t share them. It is more like- only tell us if it is favorable to us, otherwise keep your mouth shut or we will ban you or try to discredit you.
    The peptide space unfortunately is not an unbias place and too many people have a steak in the game…

    Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

    quicksilver80Q 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • C Commander

      The SNP Telegram group just booted me for posting those results.
      I am starting to realize that too many people in these Telegram groups and boards have a vested interest not to have clear transparent information out there. I mean arguing with me about a test report is crazy.
      It is simple, we always say test your peptides, but why would we do that if we simply didn’t believe the results that we got or didn’t share them. It is more like- only tell us if it is favorable to us, otherwise keep your mouth shut or we will ban you or try to discredit you.
      The peptide space unfortunately is not an unbias place and too many people have a steak in the game…

      quicksilver80Q Offline
      quicksilver80Q Offline
      quicksilver80
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      @Commander unfortunately theres now too much money at stake in it. I know a guy running a small shop. and if his numbers are a tenth of what they are up to being a bigger company. a couple bad tests on the forum can screw with hundreds of thousands of dollars very quickly.

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • R Offline
        R Offline
        ResearchCat
        wrote last edited by
        #9

        @commander Damn, it’s on fire today. I don’t go there every day but it is a rolling dumpster fire.

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • quicksilver80Q quicksilver80

          @Commander unfortunately theres now too much money at stake in it. I know a guy running a small shop. and if his numbers are a tenth of what they are up to being a bigger company. a couple bad tests on the forum can screw with hundreds of thousands of dollars very quickly.

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Commander
          wrote last edited by
          #10

          @quicksilver80
          I completely agree. But people take posting those results as bad. Those results aren’t bad at all. The bad thing is they differ very much from Janoshik’s.
          My worry is why do we have two different test results? Is Freedom off, is Janoshik off or is this just one odd ball vial. We really should get to the bottom of this if we are going to trust any test results at all, otherwise we are flying blind.
          What if Freedom’s test results are bad? If thst is the case we wouldn’t want people to keep sending in and paying for tests that aren’t valid would we?
          These results only reassure me that I am getting good product from Nexaph. I will always buy from them.
          BUT a huge red flag was how quick they booted me from the SNP group for posting those test results and they were very aggressive in telling me how Janoshik is the Gold Standard in testing me and that is the entire peptide community’s opinion. How would they know what the entire peptide community thinks? Especially if they censor it…
          I Inspect What I Expect, I have no bias. I share what I find good or bad. For what it is worth, I hate finding contradictory stuff. When I do, I am faced with should I share my findings and face a ton of people arguing me about them. Or keep everything I find out just for me and my friends. It actually sucks..

          Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

          quicksilver80Q 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • R ResearchCat

            @commander Damn, it’s on fire today. I don’t go there every day but it is a rolling dumpster fire.

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Commander
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            @ResearchCat
            Yep, they are pissed I posted them. I also posted them on STG.
            I am sure SNP probably deleted everything I posted…
            Censorship. Lets burn some books!!!

            Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Commander

              @quicksilver80
              I completely agree. But people take posting those results as bad. Those results aren’t bad at all. The bad thing is they differ very much from Janoshik’s.
              My worry is why do we have two different test results? Is Freedom off, is Janoshik off or is this just one odd ball vial. We really should get to the bottom of this if we are going to trust any test results at all, otherwise we are flying blind.
              What if Freedom’s test results are bad? If thst is the case we wouldn’t want people to keep sending in and paying for tests that aren’t valid would we?
              These results only reassure me that I am getting good product from Nexaph. I will always buy from them.
              BUT a huge red flag was how quick they booted me from the SNP group for posting those test results and they were very aggressive in telling me how Janoshik is the Gold Standard in testing me and that is the entire peptide community’s opinion. How would they know what the entire peptide community thinks? Especially if they censor it…
              I Inspect What I Expect, I have no bias. I share what I find good or bad. For what it is worth, I hate finding contradictory stuff. When I do, I am faced with should I share my findings and face a ton of people arguing me about them. Or keep everything I find out just for me and my friends. It actually sucks..

              quicksilver80Q Offline
              quicksilver80Q Offline
              quicksilver80
              wrote last edited by
              #12

              @Commander could be vial to vial. could be transport to and from. could be the time it takes from point a to point b you and then to point c. different temps from where janoshik is to freedom. etc. i mean were talking about relatively unstable lypo powders here. say a .5 percent discrepancy over probably 10000 vials in a batch test isnt bad but also isnt terrible either.

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • quicksilver80Q quicksilver80

                @Commander could be vial to vial. could be transport to and from. could be the time it takes from point a to point b you and then to point c. different temps from where janoshik is to freedom. etc. i mean were talking about relatively unstable lypo powders here. say a .5 percent discrepancy over probably 10000 vials in a batch test isnt bad but also isnt terrible either.

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Commander
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                @quicksilver80
                It is WAY more than 5%, it is 20%. 5% isn’t bad at all, that is kind of what I was expecting, not 20%.
                Again, I love Nexaph products. My concern is the testing process.

                Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Commander
                  wrote last edited by
                  #14

                  And I just got this in Telemess… Makes me wonder wjat is going on. I am new to these boards and Telemess, but just being new doesn’t mean, don’t share what you found - or does it?
                  IMG_1888.png

                  Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K Offline
                    K Offline
                    kj4otu
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    Them booting you from the snp group should tell you all you want to know, regardless of any testing. Time to move on. Looks like STG did.

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • K kj4otu

                      Them booting you from the snp group should tell you all you want to know, regardless of any testing. Time to move on. Looks like STG did.

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Commander
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @kj4otu
                      I think you are right. A shame, I like Nexaph products. But their behavior in this matter is very troubling. The worse part, I didn’t ask for any money back, any credit or anything. I am not even using the CJC/Ipa, I don’t like it. I was simply asking to get to the bottom of this difference.

                      Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups