Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community

Peptide Critic Community

  1. Randy the Rats Research Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Reta doomsday
Monthly Contest

No contest currently running. Check back soon!

Reta doomsday

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
59 Posts 26 Posters 1.0k Views 7 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B bfuller

    @diegoc Chris Duffin calls Reta the Ferrari that can be too much for a sub section of the population, he converts them to Tirz/MOTS-C/SS-31 and calls it the Rolls Royce Stack. I am going to give it a shot one day....pun inteded. 😀

    D Offline
    D Offline
    diegoc
    wrote last edited by
    #43

    @bfuller Thats the exact stack i start on Monday.

    Start with 500mcg of Tirz and work my way up to 1.5 but as long as i hit my protein targets, that tells me my dose

    Ive done the 1gram ss-31 protocol so cell should be good.

    Ss-31 on Gym Days 3mg 4x a week
    Mots-C on Non gym days with Fasted Cardio around 10mg a week.

    B 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • D diegoc

      @bfuller Thats the exact stack i start on Monday.

      Start with 500mcg of Tirz and work my way up to 1.5 but as long as i hit my protein targets, that tells me my dose

      Ive done the 1gram ss-31 protocol so cell should be good.

      Ss-31 on Gym Days 3mg 4x a week
      Mots-C on Non gym days with Fasted Cardio around 10mg a week.

      B Offline
      B Offline
      bfuller
      wrote last edited by
      #44

      @diegoc Keep us updated on how the Rolls Royce performs! I'm interested in this combo it seems like a beauty stack.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Offline
        D Offline
        diegoc
        wrote last edited by
        #45

        I will… I do a Dexa scan next week and i think im around 13-14% BF then 16 weeks journey to 8% 💪

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • H Offline
          H Offline
          HockeyRat
          wrote last edited by
          #46

          IMG_6542.png

          Well….here we go.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • NewenoughN Offline
            NewenoughN Offline
            Newenough
            wrote last edited by
            #47

            Not sure how they were getting away with it in the first place. It not an FDA Green Listed product.

            pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • NewenoughN Newenough

              Not sure how they were getting away with it in the first place. It not an FDA Green Listed product.

              pep_researcherP Offline
              pep_researcherP Offline
              pep_researcher
              wrote last edited by
              #48

              @Newenough The money they must have minted from it makes it all worth it. Plus these are just peptides not hard drugs with regulatory prohibitions. So people take their chances and end up building mansions. 😂

              NewenoughN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                @Newenough The money they must have minted from it makes it all worth it. Plus these are just peptides not hard drugs with regulatory prohibitions. So people take their chances and end up building mansions. 😂

                NewenoughN Offline
                NewenoughN Offline
                Newenough
                wrote last edited by Newenough
                #49

                @pep_researcher said:

                @Newenough The money they must have minted from it makes it all worth it. Plus these are just peptides not hard drugs with regulatory prohibitions. So people take their chances and end up building mansions. 😂

                Possible, but if they can prove damages (compensatory and punitive), plus attorney fees, they could lose all that and then some. If Eli is looking for scalps, they'll get them. If nothing else, to prove a point.

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • NewenoughN Newenough

                  @pep_researcher said:

                  @Newenough The money they must have minted from it makes it all worth it. Plus these are just peptides not hard drugs with regulatory prohibitions. So people take their chances and end up building mansions. 😂

                  Possible, but if they can prove damages (compensatory and punitive), plus attorney fees, they could lose all that and then some. If Eli is looking for scalps, they'll get them. If nothing else, to prove a point.

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stevepep
                  wrote last edited by
                  #50

                  @Newenough they just declare bankruptcy and start the business under a new name. The whole thing is for the media attention and to try and pressure regulators. The next presidential election will be huge it’s regulation v common sense. This administration will thumb their nose at Lilly now they have a lot of politicians in their pocket so the next cycle will be massive for peptides. We have a 2 year window where not much will change

                  pep_researcherP NewenoughN 2 Replies Last reply
                  1
                  • S Stevepep

                    @Newenough they just declare bankruptcy and start the business under a new name. The whole thing is for the media attention and to try and pressure regulators. The next presidential election will be huge it’s regulation v common sense. This administration will thumb their nose at Lilly now they have a lot of politicians in their pocket so the next cycle will be massive for peptides. We have a 2 year window where not much will change

                    pep_researcherP Offline
                    pep_researcherP Offline
                    pep_researcher
                    wrote last edited by
                    #51

                    @Stevepep I'm missing context here. So you mean Dems will come down harder on peptides, not just GLPs but others too? I know FDA has some nutjobs who did that autocratic sneaky move in 2023 and still dragging their feet, but I'm not sure if overall this can be pinned on a specific party.

                    EL has everybody in their pocket, so they may go after sale of GLPs and compounders, but that's bipartisan. Look at the SAFE drug act nonsense, it was a bipartisan bill from Illinois R and D fellas.

                    Not sure of the 2 yr timeline, there is already enough nonsense which will increase regardless of changes in WH.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                      @Stevepep I'm missing context here. So you mean Dems will come down harder on peptides, not just GLPs but others too? I know FDA has some nutjobs who did that autocratic sneaky move in 2023 and still dragging their feet, but I'm not sure if overall this can be pinned on a specific party.

                      EL has everybody in their pocket, so they may go after sale of GLPs and compounders, but that's bipartisan. Look at the SAFE drug act nonsense, it was a bipartisan bill from Illinois R and D fellas.

                      Not sure of the 2 yr timeline, there is already enough nonsense which will increase regardless of changes in WH.

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Stevepep
                      wrote last edited by
                      #52

                      @pep_researcher Not Dems or Republicans, the candidate. The president has control over the agencies, and this administration does not like Pharma after being misled during the early stages of Covid. RFK Jr is no friend to Pharma. Both parties have many people who are on the take from Pharma I am not making this a party thing at all. I posted a while ago a list of the politicians who are on the take its both parties.

                      pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stevepep

                        @pep_researcher Not Dems or Republicans, the candidate. The president has control over the agencies, and this administration does not like Pharma after being misled during the early stages of Covid. RFK Jr is no friend to Pharma. Both parties have many people who are on the take from Pharma I am not making this a party thing at all. I posted a while ago a list of the politicians who are on the take its both parties.

                        pep_researcherP Offline
                        pep_researcherP Offline
                        pep_researcher
                        wrote last edited by
                        #53

                        @Stevepep Oh okay gotcha!

                        I wasn't in the US during COVID time, but I have heard a lot of animosity and doubt around COVID vaccine. Also why are they STILL pinning people with that. I was in a not so rich pharma country during COVID, they barely managed to give 2 shots to most of the population and then stopped. No more COVID vaccine after 2022.

                        S 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Stevepep

                          @Newenough they just declare bankruptcy and start the business under a new name. The whole thing is for the media attention and to try and pressure regulators. The next presidential election will be huge it’s regulation v common sense. This administration will thumb their nose at Lilly now they have a lot of politicians in their pocket so the next cycle will be massive for peptides. We have a 2 year window where not much will change

                          NewenoughN Offline
                          NewenoughN Offline
                          Newenough
                          wrote last edited by Newenough
                          #54

                          @Stevepep said:

                          @Newenough they just declare bankruptcy and start the business under a new name. The whole thing is for the media attention and to try and pressure regulators. The next presidential election will be huge it’s regulation v common sense. This administration will thumb their nose at Lilly now they have a lot of politicians in their pocket so the next cycle will be massive for peptides. We have a 2 year window where not much will change

                          I kinda agree. If Lilly can prove the "RUO" designation was a known fiction designed solely to illegally distribute an unapproved drug, and trying to hide behind an LLC shield, a judge could likely rule that the company was being used to promote the fraud, which is a primary trigger for piercing the corporate veil. Making the owners personally responsible.

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • NewenoughN Newenough

                            @Stevepep said:

                            @Newenough they just declare bankruptcy and start the business under a new name. The whole thing is for the media attention and to try and pressure regulators. The next presidential election will be huge it’s regulation v common sense. This administration will thumb their nose at Lilly now they have a lot of politicians in their pocket so the next cycle will be massive for peptides. We have a 2 year window where not much will change

                            I kinda agree. If Lilly can prove the "RUO" designation was a known fiction designed solely to illegally distribute an unapproved drug, and trying to hide behind an LLC shield, a judge could likely rule that the company was being used to promote the fraud, which is a primary trigger for piercing the corporate veil. Making the owners personally responsible.

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Stevepep
                            wrote last edited by Stevepep
                            #55

                            @Newenough It's almost impossible, and they have the money so tied up you could never collect it if they just get decent legal advice. Now if its criminal thats entirely different

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

                              @Stevepep Oh okay gotcha!

                              I wasn't in the US during COVID time, but I have heard a lot of animosity and doubt around COVID vaccine. Also why are they STILL pinning people with that. I was in a not so rich pharma country during COVID, they barely managed to give 2 shots to most of the population and then stopped. No more COVID vaccine after 2022.

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Stevepep
                              wrote last edited by
                              #56

                              @pep_researcher It's not a secret that RFK is no fan of vaccines and Pharma. Trump has gone after Pfizer to release all of the COVID records, which they haven't done. They are just not going to bow down to Pharma; we may not have that in two years. Right now, the regulators aren't going to play along. Now if it's defense than different story. Like drones

                              pep_researcherP M 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • S Stevepep

                                @pep_researcher It's not a secret that RFK is no fan of vaccines and Pharma. Trump has gone after Pfizer to release all of the COVID records, which they haven't done. They are just not going to bow down to Pharma; we may not have that in two years. Right now, the regulators aren't going to play along. Now if it's defense than different story. Like drones

                                pep_researcherP Offline
                                pep_researcherP Offline
                                pep_researcher
                                wrote last edited by
                                #57

                                @Stevepep I see. It'll be interesting because the peptide craze ship has sailed. Now there's no stopping. So it's also possible that the new administration just pivots and invest in that more if they see that people are willing to spend on it.

                                In two more years the interest and research is further going to grow exponentially.

                                Because if they try to go against people's will, they might lose their positions.

                                Never underestimate the power of numbers 🙂

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Stevepep

                                  @pep_researcher It's not a secret that RFK is no fan of vaccines and Pharma. Trump has gone after Pfizer to release all of the COVID records, which they haven't done. They are just not going to bow down to Pharma; we may not have that in two years. Right now, the regulators aren't going to play along. Now if it's defense than different story. Like drones

                                  M Online
                                  M Online
                                  ManicXmedic
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #58

                                  @Stevepep said:

                                  @pep_researcher It's not a secret that RFK is no fan of vaccines and Pharma. Trump has gone after Pfizer to release all of the COVID records, which they haven't done. They are just not going to bow down to Pharma; we may not have that in two years. Right now, the regulators aren't going to play along. Now if it's defense than different story. Like drones

                                  If trump is the secret special access patient that is getting reta from Lilly I'd imagine he'd try to stay on friendly terms with them. He's a nut job when it comes to vaccines sure, but he's not averse to giving favors to any company or government that will advantage him including pharma imo

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • EXTROPIANE EXTROPIAN

                                    Just to play it safe. Time to stock up.

                                    M Online
                                    M Online
                                    montemontemayor
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #59

                                    @EXTROPIAN said:

                                    Just to play it safe. Time to stock up.

                                    Thats exactly what i did. I grabbed about a year of stock, and I dont even take it yet. I am planning on starting in Sept but just wanted a little stock just in case. 🙂

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0

                                    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                    Register Login
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups