Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community Peptide Critic Community
  1. Peptide Forum
  2. Peptide Discussion
  3. Reta doomsday
Prize
Peptide Critic Case and Pens
Ends in
316 entries · 190 participants
Enter →

Reta doomsday

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Peptide Discussion
105 Posts 31 Posters 6.3k Views 6 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Stevepep

    @Newenough they just declare bankruptcy and start the business under a new name. The whole thing is for the media attention and to try and pressure regulators. The next presidential election will be huge it’s regulation v common sense. This administration will thumb their nose at Lilly now they have a lot of politicians in their pocket so the next cycle will be massive for peptides. We have a 2 year window where not much will change

    pep_researcherP Offline
    pep_researcherP Offline
    pep_researcher
    wrote last edited by
    #51

    @Stevepep I'm missing context here. So you mean Dems will come down harder on peptides, not just GLPs but others too? I know FDA has some nutjobs who did that autocratic sneaky move in 2023 and still dragging their feet, but I'm not sure if overall this can be pinned on a specific party.

    EL has everybody in their pocket, so they may go after sale of GLPs and compounders, but that's bipartisan. Look at the SAFE drug act nonsense, it was a bipartisan bill from Illinois R and D fellas.

    Not sure of the 2 yr timeline, there is already enough nonsense which will increase regardless of changes in WH.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

      @Stevepep I'm missing context here. So you mean Dems will come down harder on peptides, not just GLPs but others too? I know FDA has some nutjobs who did that autocratic sneaky move in 2023 and still dragging their feet, but I'm not sure if overall this can be pinned on a specific party.

      EL has everybody in their pocket, so they may go after sale of GLPs and compounders, but that's bipartisan. Look at the SAFE drug act nonsense, it was a bipartisan bill from Illinois R and D fellas.

      Not sure of the 2 yr timeline, there is already enough nonsense which will increase regardless of changes in WH.

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Stevepep
      wrote last edited by
      #52

      @pep_researcher Not Dems or Republicans, the candidate. The president has control over the agencies, and this administration does not like Pharma after being misled during the early stages of Covid. RFK Jr is no friend to Pharma. Both parties have many people who are on the take from Pharma I am not making this a party thing at all. I posted a while ago a list of the politicians who are on the take its both parties.

      pep_researcherP 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • S Stevepep

        @pep_researcher Not Dems or Republicans, the candidate. The president has control over the agencies, and this administration does not like Pharma after being misled during the early stages of Covid. RFK Jr is no friend to Pharma. Both parties have many people who are on the take from Pharma I am not making this a party thing at all. I posted a while ago a list of the politicians who are on the take its both parties.

        pep_researcherP Offline
        pep_researcherP Offline
        pep_researcher
        wrote last edited by
        #53

        @Stevepep Oh okay gotcha!

        I wasn't in the US during COVID time, but I have heard a lot of animosity and doubt around COVID vaccine. Also why are they STILL pinning people with that. I was in a not so rich pharma country during COVID, they barely managed to give 2 shots to most of the population and then stopped. No more COVID vaccine after 2022.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • S Stevepep

          @Newenough they just declare bankruptcy and start the business under a new name. The whole thing is for the media attention and to try and pressure regulators. The next presidential election will be huge it’s regulation v common sense. This administration will thumb their nose at Lilly now they have a lot of politicians in their pocket so the next cycle will be massive for peptides. We have a 2 year window where not much will change

          NewenoughN Offline
          NewenoughN Offline
          Newenough
          wrote last edited by Newenough
          #54

          @Stevepep said:

          @Newenough they just declare bankruptcy and start the business under a new name. The whole thing is for the media attention and to try and pressure regulators. The next presidential election will be huge it’s regulation v common sense. This administration will thumb their nose at Lilly now they have a lot of politicians in their pocket so the next cycle will be massive for peptides. We have a 2 year window where not much will change

          I kinda agree. If Lilly can prove the "RUO" designation was a known fiction designed solely to illegally distribute an unapproved drug, and trying to hide behind an LLC shield, a judge could likely rule that the company was being used to promote the fraud, which is a primary trigger for piercing the corporate veil. Making the owners personally responsible.

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • NewenoughN Newenough

            @Stevepep said:

            @Newenough they just declare bankruptcy and start the business under a new name. The whole thing is for the media attention and to try and pressure regulators. The next presidential election will be huge it’s regulation v common sense. This administration will thumb their nose at Lilly now they have a lot of politicians in their pocket so the next cycle will be massive for peptides. We have a 2 year window where not much will change

            I kinda agree. If Lilly can prove the "RUO" designation was a known fiction designed solely to illegally distribute an unapproved drug, and trying to hide behind an LLC shield, a judge could likely rule that the company was being used to promote the fraud, which is a primary trigger for piercing the corporate veil. Making the owners personally responsible.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stevepep
            wrote last edited by Stevepep
            #55

            @Newenough It's almost impossible, and they have the money so tied up you could never collect it if they just get decent legal advice. Now if its criminal thats entirely different

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • pep_researcherP pep_researcher

              @Stevepep Oh okay gotcha!

              I wasn't in the US during COVID time, but I have heard a lot of animosity and doubt around COVID vaccine. Also why are they STILL pinning people with that. I was in a not so rich pharma country during COVID, they barely managed to give 2 shots to most of the population and then stopped. No more COVID vaccine after 2022.

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stevepep
              wrote last edited by
              #56

              @pep_researcher It's not a secret that RFK is no fan of vaccines and Pharma. Trump has gone after Pfizer to release all of the COVID records, which they haven't done. They are just not going to bow down to Pharma; we may not have that in two years. Right now, the regulators aren't going to play along. Now if it's defense than different story. Like drones

              pep_researcherP M 2 Replies Last reply
              1
              • S Stevepep

                @pep_researcher It's not a secret that RFK is no fan of vaccines and Pharma. Trump has gone after Pfizer to release all of the COVID records, which they haven't done. They are just not going to bow down to Pharma; we may not have that in two years. Right now, the regulators aren't going to play along. Now if it's defense than different story. Like drones

                pep_researcherP Offline
                pep_researcherP Offline
                pep_researcher
                wrote last edited by
                #57

                @Stevepep I see. It'll be interesting because the peptide craze ship has sailed. Now there's no stopping. So it's also possible that the new administration just pivots and invest in that more if they see that people are willing to spend on it.

                In two more years the interest and research is further going to grow exponentially.

                Because if they try to go against people's will, they might lose their positions.

                Never underestimate the power of numbers 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Stevepep

                  @pep_researcher It's not a secret that RFK is no fan of vaccines and Pharma. Trump has gone after Pfizer to release all of the COVID records, which they haven't done. They are just not going to bow down to Pharma; we may not have that in two years. Right now, the regulators aren't going to play along. Now if it's defense than different story. Like drones

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  ManicXmedic
                  wrote last edited by
                  #58

                  @Stevepep said:

                  @pep_researcher It's not a secret that RFK is no fan of vaccines and Pharma. Trump has gone after Pfizer to release all of the COVID records, which they haven't done. They are just not going to bow down to Pharma; we may not have that in two years. Right now, the regulators aren't going to play along. Now if it's defense than different story. Like drones

                  If trump is the secret special access patient that is getting reta from Lilly I'd imagine he'd try to stay on friendly terms with them. He's a nut job when it comes to vaccines sure, but he's not averse to giving favors to any company or government that will advantage him including pharma imo

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • EXTROPIANE EXTROPIAN

                    Just to play it safe. Time to stock up.

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    montemontemayor
                    wrote last edited by
                    #59

                    @EXTROPIAN said:

                    Just to play it safe. Time to stock up.

                    Thats exactly what i did. I grabbed about a year of stock, and I dont even take it yet. I am planning on starting in Sept but just wanted a little stock just in case. 🙂

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • M montemontemayor

                      @EXTROPIAN said:

                      Just to play it safe. Time to stock up.

                      Thats exactly what i did. I grabbed about a year of stock, and I dont even take it yet. I am planning on starting in Sept but just wanted a little stock just in case. 🙂

                      C Offline
                      C Offline
                      Commander
                      wrote last edited by
                      #60

                      @montemontemayor said:

                      @EXTROPIAN said:

                      Just to play it safe. Time to stock up.

                      Thats exactly what i did. I grabbed about a year of stock, and I dont even take it yet. I am planning on starting in Sept but just wanted a little stock just in case. 🙂

                      If you have the funds,I would buy 2 more years worth, better safe than sorry….
                      Even if we are still able to get it, the price will defiantly be going up

                      Please excuse my typos. Small Phone & Bad Eyes

                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • M ManicXmedic

                        @Stevepep said:

                        @pep_researcher It's not a secret that RFK is no fan of vaccines and Pharma. Trump has gone after Pfizer to release all of the COVID records, which they haven't done. They are just not going to bow down to Pharma; we may not have that in two years. Right now, the regulators aren't going to play along. Now if it's defense than different story. Like drones

                        If trump is the secret special access patient that is getting reta from Lilly I'd imagine he'd try to stay on friendly terms with them. He's a nut job when it comes to vaccines sure, but he's not averse to giving favors to any company or government that will advantage him including pharma imo

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Stevepep
                        wrote last edited by Stevepep
                        #61

                        @ManicXmedic I really don’t want to make this political that wasn’t my intention. I think the secret lily access has been debunked 1000 times over. It’s pretty clear this group is not owned by pharma. The last group banned peptide compounding this group just approved a bunch of them and it looks like there is more to come. Not just that but they have been open to micro dosing for ptsd etc. the one thing pharma doesn’t want is a healthy population that for sure pissed them off allowing those peptides to be compounded. They have an ax to grind over Covid where the vaccines failed to prevent people from getting the virus as promised and the story changed endlessly. Trump went all in with pharma and and got burned during covid we all know how he reacts to these things. In this case it’s good for us

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • W Offline
                          W Offline
                          WowwyZowwy
                          wrote last edited by
                          #62

                          As popular as they have become, I believe we’re still in the infancy stage of GLP-1s and the like. Even though a lot of people use them now, I personally believe that they’ll say 90% of the population should be on them (I might actually agree). That would be money unseen by any pharma company EVER! They also have crazy deep pockets. I wouldn’t be surprised if they engage in the Tom and Jerry anyways and start buying up the Chinese API’s. Me? I’m going @commander and stocking up!

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • W WowwyZowwy

                            As popular as they have become, I believe we’re still in the infancy stage of GLP-1s and the like. Even though a lot of people use them now, I personally believe that they’ll say 90% of the population should be on them (I might actually agree). That would be money unseen by any pharma company EVER! They also have crazy deep pockets. I wouldn’t be surprised if they engage in the Tom and Jerry anyways and start buying up the Chinese API’s. Me? I’m going @commander and stocking up!

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Stevepep
                            wrote last edited by
                            #63

                            @WowwyZowwy 99pct of the population can’t afford it. Insurance won’t pay for it. 70pct of the claims are denied. About 20 pct of the population can afford it in the US: that leaves the grey market for everyone else if there is a market someone will fill it. It’s just math

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • EXTROPIANE Offline
                              EXTROPIANE Offline
                              EXTROPIAN
                              wrote last edited by
                              #64

                              The Reta control continues
                              https://youtu.be/wG6vuwuX-xI?is=odweRoSc54cEC8Uw

                              2M

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              3
                              • EXTROPIANE EXTROPIAN

                                The Reta control continues
                                https://youtu.be/wG6vuwuX-xI?is=odweRoSc54cEC8Uw

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Stevepep
                                wrote last edited by
                                #65

                                @EXTROPIAN blah blah blah

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • ResearchCatR Offline
                                  ResearchCatR Offline
                                  ResearchCat
                                  wrote last edited by ResearchCat
                                  #66

                                  So the takeaway here should be that every peptide channel you are on is being monitored, likely including this one, and that they are probably introducing contaminated peptides into the market in order to justify a crackdown, which combined with people taking way too much, gives them what they need.

                                  I’ve had a fun week, which, without going into details, I can tell you has only further undermined what little confidence or trust I have in any and all doctors. So yes, I trust Jenny on Telegram more than I trust my army of Harvard educated doctors, who seem heavily invested in giving me expensive treatments and prescribing meds based on 50 year old regimens instead of what every T clinic and telehealth company in the world is doing.

                                  Yeah, well, I’m just here for the research, man. - The Dude

                                  If I haven’t liked your post, no offense. I have exceeded my daily allowance.

                                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                                  5
                                  • ResearchCatR ResearchCat

                                    So the takeaway here should be that every peptide channel you are on is being monitored, likely including this one, and that they are probably introducing contaminated peptides into the market in order to justify a crackdown, which combined with people taking way too much, gives them what they need.

                                    I’ve had a fun week, which, without going into details, I can tell you has only further undermined what little confidence or trust I have in any and all doctors. So yes, I trust Jenny on Telegram more than I trust my army of Harvard educated doctors, who seem heavily invested in giving me expensive treatments and prescribing meds based on 50 year old regimens instead of what every T clinic and telehealth company in the world is doing.

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Stevepep
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #67

                                    @ResearchCat the take away from that YouTube video is views. Reta is cheaper and more available than ever

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • ResearchCatR Offline
                                      ResearchCatR Offline
                                      ResearchCat
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #68

                                      Yeah, there was no new information in that video. Just the same fearmongering as everywhere else.

                                      There is a well known phenomenon wrt social media where the more times you hear something, the more likely you are to believe it(that is true generally…), but the vast majority of the content comes from 2% of creators and everything else is copycats and re-tweeters, so almost everything you see or read is coming from one source, with everyone else clout-chasing for views or attention.

                                      Yeah, well, I’m just here for the research, man. - The Dude

                                      If I haven’t liked your post, no offense. I have exceeded my daily allowance.

                                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ResearchCatR ResearchCat

                                        Yeah, there was no new information in that video. Just the same fearmongering as everywhere else.

                                        There is a well known phenomenon wrt social media where the more times you hear something, the more likely you are to believe it(that is true generally…), but the vast majority of the content comes from 2% of creators and everything else is copycats and re-tweeters, so almost everything you see or read is coming from one source, with everyone else clout-chasing for views or attention.

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        Stevepep
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #69

                                        @ResearchCat it’s all old stuff that had zero impact. It gets posted and the guy who used AI to create the video gets views because there are over 16,000 people on here and then he gets his YouTube payment and it just continues. It probably helped crush for their pre sale that will sell out no matter who they use for testing in an hour now.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Stevepep
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #70

                                          We aren’t going to prevent Lilly from making their money they are getting exactly what they wanted out of this it’s called fear mongering. They are driving up interest which puts pressure on insurance companies to cover more of the population. The vast majority can’t afford the cash pay option, they know insurance is the key. This really isn’t that hard. The market we play in keeps getting more competitive and prices have been trending down. I just bought Reta 60 on airdrop, bought Reta 30 from peotegridy for $95 these prices are unheard of. Look at Crush’s presale on Reta. Nexaph has a 25pct off sale as I write this. We just need to bring logic into the equation and look at the market after the Lilly law suits and threats it’s a big fat nothing. That being said I bet people are buying like a hurricane is coming and there will be no bottled water.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          2

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups