Klotho / FLGR242 (albumin-bound new tech)
-
Awesome! FLGR242 is being described as "the fountain of youth" by one compounder we know and another is calling it "bollocks" I know alpha biomed is supplying biolongevity and paramount with the same thing. I may be a rat but I'm glad you are doing the research for us ;).
If this is a myostatin inhibitor without the risks/drawbacks it will change everything.
@Randy Sorry I'm so late to the show. My provider directed me to Alpha BioMed Labs since I too am a health care provider who qualified to open an account with them. That company hosted a Zoom meeting with Mike Farber who specifically talked about how alpha-KlothoLR was not the monoclonal antibody, but the one modified with an albumin carrier to extend the longevity of the large protein. What confused me was that I then looked at the Alpha BioMed website. It was selling alpha-Klotho MAB and specifically said it was the monoclonal antibody. Fast forward to Google search engine, and I stumbled upon Biolongevity Lab's "alpha-KlothoLR." However, the COA to that read "alpha-Klotho MAB." So what is going on here? BLL sells alpha-Klotho cheaper than it is on Alpha Biomed (the supplier?) website.
I then perused all the products on the Alpha BioMed website. No COAs are published. I came on the PeptideCritic website hoping there was some commentary about Alpha BioMed. I reached out to this company and their support was clueless. In the RUO, PUO, CUO space, most reputable companies I've stumbled upon publish COAs, real and fake ones. Alpha BioMed does not?
How do they intend to sell any peptides if they don't have a clue about what they are selling? Or maybe some Poindexter-like character is hidden away in some hidden corner making peptides or rocket fuel for the Master Cylinder, and no one else at the company knows what is going on. How do they intend to sell to consumers or rat doctors?
The epigenome is malleable. Squish responsibly.
-
@Randy Sorry I'm so late to the show. My provider directed me to Alpha BioMed Labs since I too am a health care provider who qualified to open an account with them. That company hosted a Zoom meeting with Mike Farber who specifically talked about how alpha-KlothoLR was not the monoclonal antibody, but the one modified with an albumin carrier to extend the longevity of the large protein. What confused me was that I then looked at the Alpha BioMed website. It was selling alpha-Klotho MAB and specifically said it was the monoclonal antibody. Fast forward to Google search engine, and I stumbled upon Biolongevity Lab's "alpha-KlothoLR." However, the COA to that read "alpha-Klotho MAB." So what is going on here? BLL sells alpha-Klotho cheaper than it is on Alpha Biomed (the supplier?) website.
I then perused all the products on the Alpha BioMed website. No COAs are published. I came on the PeptideCritic website hoping there was some commentary about Alpha BioMed. I reached out to this company and their support was clueless. In the RUO, PUO, CUO space, most reputable companies I've stumbled upon publish COAs, real and fake ones. Alpha BioMed does not?
How do they intend to sell any peptides if they don't have a clue about what they are selling? Or maybe some Poindexter-like character is hidden away in some hidden corner making peptides or rocket fuel for the Master Cylinder, and no one else at the company knows what is going on. How do they intend to sell to consumers or rat doctors?
-
@Randy Sorry I'm so late to the show. My provider directed me to Alpha BioMed Labs since I too am a health care provider who qualified to open an account with them. That company hosted a Zoom meeting with Mike Farber who specifically talked about how alpha-KlothoLR was not the monoclonal antibody, but the one modified with an albumin carrier to extend the longevity of the large protein. What confused me was that I then looked at the Alpha BioMed website. It was selling alpha-Klotho MAB and specifically said it was the monoclonal antibody. Fast forward to Google search engine, and I stumbled upon Biolongevity Lab's "alpha-KlothoLR." However, the COA to that read "alpha-Klotho MAB." So what is going on here? BLL sells alpha-Klotho cheaper than it is on Alpha Biomed (the supplier?) website.
I then perused all the products on the Alpha BioMed website. No COAs are published. I came on the PeptideCritic website hoping there was some commentary about Alpha BioMed. I reached out to this company and their support was clueless. In the RUO, PUO, CUO space, most reputable companies I've stumbled upon publish COAs, real and fake ones. Alpha BioMed does not?
How do they intend to sell any peptides if they don't have a clue about what they are selling? Or maybe some Poindexter-like character is hidden away in some hidden corner making peptides or rocket fuel for the Master Cylinder, and no one else at the company knows what is going on. How do they intend to sell to consumers or rat doctors?
@ImaFrogNotaRat good luck with getting information from these companies. I have asked them many questions already, basic ones, about what they sell. Most of the time they are unable to answer clearly, not that they say they don't know, they just give me some irrelevant, or nonsensical or clearly wrong information. If I follow up, it usually ends up in "if you want to know what we sell to you, you must test it yourself". Also, these sites have many mistakes and mixups in product names, formulas, molar masses, etc., so you have to be a detective to decrypt it.
-
@imafrognotarat They are mostly selling through T clinics and dr’s offices where noobs and regular folks pay $400 for a 5mg vial of sermorelin or 5/5 wolverine and don’t know what a COA is or to question the purity of it because it comes through a ‘legit’ source and says PUO on the bottle.
The beauty of the medical industrial complex is that people will take almost anything you tell them to without questioning it because they’re the experts.
-
I am considering trying Klotho from BLL (albumin-bound), it's about $400 for 1 month supply now. Don't know yet, sounds very promising. Peptidology promises to add Klotho to their line soon too, I don't know what kind.
-
I was in the Jay Campbell community for a month before I got pissed off and left. Almost the whole community got mad at me for talking about how tesamorelin doesnt need to be in the fridge after reconstitution. Couple of them basically called me a liar and started raving about all the results they had on tesa purchased through biolongevity labs. They all put it in the fridge after mixing and none of them ever had it gel on them or get cloudy. I made the comment that it doesnt sound like they were getting actual tesamorelin and then I posted the reconstitution instructions from the Egrifta website. The site speaks to how they had to alter the original tesamorelin due to cold gelling. Anyways im not welcome in that community anymore. Kind of let me know the level of integrity over there. Plus that dude charges insane money for bioregulators in injection form. I wont purchase anything from Jay Campbell. I dont mean to offend anyone, but to have all them people argue with me against the storage protocol on something that is widely proven and discussed made me think they were all brainwashed. You know who else is brainwashed?! Zombies, so there ya go. My chupacabra said he would make a pair of boots out of me if he caught me buying peptides for him from BLL.
-
I was in the Jay Campbell community for a month before I got pissed off and left. Almost the whole community got mad at me for talking about how tesamorelin doesnt need to be in the fridge after reconstitution. Couple of them basically called me a liar and started raving about all the results they had on tesa purchased through biolongevity labs. They all put it in the fridge after mixing and none of them ever had it gel on them or get cloudy. I made the comment that it doesnt sound like they were getting actual tesamorelin and then I posted the reconstitution instructions from the Egrifta website. The site speaks to how they had to alter the original tesamorelin due to cold gelling. Anyways im not welcome in that community anymore. Kind of let me know the level of integrity over there. Plus that dude charges insane money for bioregulators in injection form. I wont purchase anything from Jay Campbell. I dont mean to offend anyone, but to have all them people argue with me against the storage protocol on something that is widely proven and discussed made me think they were all brainwashed. You know who else is brainwashed?! Zombies, so there ya go. My chupacabra said he would make a pair of boots out of me if he caught me buying peptides for him from BLL.
@stevencarter I am very interested. I am going to reconstitute Tesamorelin, and I have one from BioLongevity and one from Southern Aminos. I did not see information of it gelling. You say I should keep it just on a shelf? I usually keep everything in the fridge, I thought the common knowledge is reconstituted peptides are not very stable at room temperature.
-
I have never had an issue with my Tes gelling and I refrigerate. And yes it is officially Tes and was tested to be Tes. I ran a 12 week cycle and now week 9 of a 16 week cycle. So I have gone through plenty of vials.
-
@shaqdiesel same. I have used 7 vials from my Nexaph kit and no gelling.
-
@shaqdiesel same. I have used 7 vials from my Nexaph kit and no gelling.
@ResearchCat I will 3rd that. No issue refrigerating.
-
Same. Not saying I am right or wrong here, but just sharing my experience. I refrigerate my reconstituted Tesa that has been acquired through 3 different sources with my own testing confirming it is indeed legit and had never had any of it gel. I only use hospira BAC though. I’ve known people with at least one of the same sources that used their BAC(not hospira) and it did in fact gel in the fridge
-
Same. Not saying I am right or wrong here, but just sharing my experience. I refrigerate my reconstituted Tesa that has been acquired through 3 different sources with my own testing confirming it is indeed legit and had never had any of it gel. I only use hospira BAC though. I’ve known people with at least one of the same sources that used their BAC(not hospira) and it did in fact gel in the fridge
@MacLeeezy Yes 100% Hospira for me as well. I have heard too many stories about bad results trying cheap BAC. It just isn't worth it.
-
In an effort to get Pete's thread back on track here's some N=1 dexa data that could be interesting for those poking around FLGR:
Jan 20. Tot mass: 168.1lbs, Lean mass: 128lbs, BF 20.7%, Fat mass: 34.8lbs, Visceral Fat:1.37lbs
July 2. Tot mass: 162.2lbs, Lean mass: 136.2lbs, BF 12.9%, Fat mass: 20.8lbs, Vis Fat: 0.91 lbs
Quick math: Tot mass: -5.9lbs, Lean mass: +8.2 lbs, BF -7.8%, Fat mass: -14lbs, Vis Fat: -0.46lbs
FLGR started second week of March. Started low 1.25mg/wk for weeks 1-2, 2.5mg/2.5mg thereafter until 2 weeks ago, now 5mg/wk. Other relevant stack items: Reta, CJC/Ipa, Enclomiphene 6.25mg/day.
Are there other ways to get these results? Sure. -
@stones67 you are right, my apologies to @peptidepete, I didnt mean to alter the course of discussion on your conversation thread, out of respect i wont explain myself on here, start another one, last thing ill say is go to egrifta.com and use the side by side comparison table to compare egrifta SV against egrifta WR, WR is the second generation tesamorelin and WR stands for without refrigeration, then read the write up about egrifta and why they had to do it, it all comes down to when and where you get it from, sorry again @peptidepete
-
In an effort to get Pete's thread back on track here's some N=1 dexa data that could be interesting for those poking around FLGR:
Jan 20. Tot mass: 168.1lbs, Lean mass: 128lbs, BF 20.7%, Fat mass: 34.8lbs, Visceral Fat:1.37lbs
July 2. Tot mass: 162.2lbs, Lean mass: 136.2lbs, BF 12.9%, Fat mass: 20.8lbs, Vis Fat: 0.91 lbs
Quick math: Tot mass: -5.9lbs, Lean mass: +8.2 lbs, BF -7.8%, Fat mass: -14lbs, Vis Fat: -0.46lbs
FLGR started second week of March. Started low 1.25mg/wk for weeks 1-2, 2.5mg/2.5mg thereafter until 2 weeks ago, now 5mg/wk. Other relevant stack items: Reta, CJC/Ipa, Enclomiphene 6.25mg/day.
Are there other ways to get these results? Sure.In an effort to get Pete's thread back on track here's some N=1 dexa data that could be interesting for those poking around FLGR:
Jan 20. Tot mass: 168.1lbs, Lean mass: 128lbs, BF 20.7%, Fat mass: 34.8lbs, Visceral Fat:1.37lbs
July 2. Tot mass: 162.2lbs, Lean mass: 136.2lbs, BF 12.9%, Fat mass: 20.8lbs, Vis Fat: 0.91 lbs
Quick math: Tot mass: -5.9lbs, Lean mass: +8.2 lbs, BF -7.8%, Fat mass: -14lbs, Vis Fat: -0.46lbs
FLGR started second week of March. Started low 1.25mg/wk for weeks 1-2, 2.5mg/2.5mg thereafter until 2 weeks ago, now 5mg/wk. Other relevant stack items: Reta, CJC/Ipa, Enclomiphene 6.25mg/day.
Are there other ways to get these results? Sure.SWEET!
Enviable results. Congrats on the smart and hard work
-
Jeff- kindly relocate if not appropriate for a new category.
Multi-vial care package delivered today from BioLongevity, pinned both with 30 minutes between each. No site reactions, feel fine, great actually.
Super intrigued by both, I've done my homework. 60's male in great health, 2.5 year carnivore, focused on maximizing healthspan. Anyone else throwing caution to the wind and researching these two?
@PeptidePete Yes! I have been using both for about 6 months. I honestly can't say how much I feel with the Klotho, but it's more about blood work anyway. I have better Kidney function and my blood markers show that since starting. Don't know if it's worth the money since I don't have significant health issues that Klotho would address anyway. But it is supposed to be the longevity peptide.
The FLGR 242, a different story. It has allowed me to drop Reta to a microdose since it burns fat so effectively. I'm a 61 year old man and have been on TRT for 6 years. Since taking the FLGR-242, I have put on more muscle and gotten ripped. I have always worked out and had good muscle size. Now it is a little bigger and like I said, ripped.
Klotho may be doing other amazing things that I don't see. That's why I still take it, but I am taking the FLGR 242 because of the results I can see. It's really a fantastic product! Hope that helps.
-
@PeptidePete Yes! I have been using both for about 6 months. I honestly can't say how much I feel with the Klotho, but it's more about blood work anyway. I have better Kidney function and my blood markers show that since starting. Don't know if it's worth the money since I don't have significant health issues that Klotho would address anyway. But it is supposed to be the longevity peptide.
The FLGR 242, a different story. It has allowed me to drop Reta to a microdose since it burns fat so effectively. I'm a 61 year old man and have been on TRT for 6 years. Since taking the FLGR-242, I have put on more muscle and gotten ripped. I have always worked out and had good muscle size. Now it is a little bigger and like I said, ripped.
Klotho may be doing other amazing things that I don't see. That's why I still take it, but I am taking the FLGR 242 because of the results I can see. It's really a fantastic product! Hope that helps.
Oh, and be careful with the FLGR-242 injections. Do not get it into your muscles. It can cause big reaction knots that stay for awhile if you do. Those reactions are noted on Jay Campbell's inner Sanctum Telegram private group page. I have never had any issues and I inject FLGR-242 twice a week 2.5mg per injection. I am now backing off to do 1mg twice per week, as I have gotten the results I was going for. Now I am in maintenance phase.
The Klotho, I inject IM twice a week as well, but have not increased dose since it can be dangerous to inject too much Klotho.Some people have said it's the albumin binder that causes the reactions, but it can't be if you can IM the Klotho since both have the binder. It is something in the FLGR product that makes it bad for IM injections.
Joel
-
Oh, and be careful with the FLGR-242 injections. Do not get it into your muscles. It can cause big reaction knots that stay for awhile if you do. Those reactions are noted on Jay Campbell's inner Sanctum Telegram private group page. I have never had any issues and I inject FLGR-242 twice a week 2.5mg per injection. I am now backing off to do 1mg twice per week, as I have gotten the results I was going for. Now I am in maintenance phase.
The Klotho, I inject IM twice a week as well, but have not increased dose since it can be dangerous to inject too much Klotho.Some people have said it's the albumin binder that causes the reactions, but it can't be if you can IM the Klotho since both have the binder. It is something in the FLGR product that makes it bad for IM injections.
Joel
@djoelcassell hey Joel.
I do klotho and i split it to 1 a week instead of every 2 weeks.
Has there been any changes were its best 2x a week?
And also i do it subq, is it better IM?
Thanks
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login