Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Peptide Critic Community

Peptide Critic Community

  1. Randy the Rats Research Forum
  2. Vendor Reviews & Orders
  3. New Lab - Koverlabs, a bit concerning?
Prize
Red, White & Blue V2 Pens
Ends in
761 entries · 373 participants
Enter →

New Lab - Koverlabs, a bit concerning?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Vendor Reviews & Orders
instant-peptidesreview
35 Posts 7 Posters 771 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • doomD Offline
    doomD Offline
    doom
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Although the new COAs look more detailed and robust, it appears that there's little to no information anywhere regarding Kovera Labs. Even the Kovera website seems to have the bare minimum information required but nothing touting the staff or their certifications. What is really troubling is that a quick google search indicates that the IP registration information overlaps with that of InstantPeptides.com which would indicate they're operated by the same folks. Anyone have any information on Kovera labs? I like InstantPeptides.com but if they're taking short cuts---not sure they're going to be a good spot to purchase from anymore.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • RandyR Offline
      RandyR Offline
      Randy
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Even if this wasnt a red flag they do the bare minimum for testing. Mass/purity on one vial isnt cutting it anyomre.

      "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • P PeptideCritic moved this topic from Instant Peptides on
      • P Offline
        P Offline
        pep_researcher
        wrote last edited by pep_researcher
        #3

        Many vendors moved to Kovera recently. Should this be a concern to avoid them?

        On another price index forum the admin there made a post a month ago that he tried to reach out to Kovera owner as he does for all other labs and Kovera was surprisingly standoffish, avoiding any open communication and contact with him.

        That's a red flag IMO. Why would a testing lab owner not want to talk to a price index admin unless they have something they are trying to hide?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • RandyR Offline
          RandyR Offline
          Randy
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Ive never set foot in the facility but i know its real. A lot of the vendors we are friendly with moved that direction because they were looking at 4-5 week delays from chromate and vanguard was losing their samples. They steer clear of trustpointe because the COA "isnt aesthetic" or something.

          I know its a real place with real equipment. And they haven't been around long enough to take bribes like jano did 2 years ago from SSA....so there's that.

          Im going to get some random compounds I already have results on from another lab and shoot them over to Kovera as TimTam von Dickerson so he doesnt know its us.

          Lets see what those results say.

          "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

          P S 2 Replies Last reply
          7
          • RandyR Randy

            Ive never set foot in the facility but i know its real. A lot of the vendors we are friendly with moved that direction because they were looking at 4-5 week delays from chromate and vanguard was losing their samples. They steer clear of trustpointe because the COA "isnt aesthetic" or something.

            I know its a real place with real equipment. And they haven't been around long enough to take bribes like jano did 2 years ago from SSA....so there's that.

            Im going to get some random compounds I already have results on from another lab and shoot them over to Kovera as TimTam von Dickerson so he doesnt know its us.

            Lets see what those results say.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            pep_researcher
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @Randy Awesome! That's why I love online pep communities and admins like you.

            That's essentially my support system to survive and thrive in the RUO world. Hehe

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • RandyR Randy

              Ive never set foot in the facility but i know its real. A lot of the vendors we are friendly with moved that direction because they were looking at 4-5 week delays from chromate and vanguard was losing their samples. They steer clear of trustpointe because the COA "isnt aesthetic" or something.

              I know its a real place with real equipment. And they haven't been around long enough to take bribes like jano did 2 years ago from SSA....so there's that.

              Im going to get some random compounds I already have results on from another lab and shoot them over to Kovera as TimTam von Dickerson so he doesnt know its us.

              Lets see what those results say.

              S Online
              S Online
              Stevepep
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @Randy I have ordered a bunch from Glacier and this is hard to believe that they would have fake COA’s but in another thread people are being told not to order from them.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gym.ratG Offline
                gym.ratG Offline
                gym.rat
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                Main Concerns

                Shared workspace / virtual address: Their listed location (Deerfield/Buffalo Grove, IL area, e.g., 570 Lake Cook Rd Suite 300 PMB) points to a coworking space or mailbox service rather than a proper equipped analytical lab. This is a common setup for low-overhead operations but raises doubts about having full HPLC, LC-MS, endotoxin, sterility, and heavy metals capabilities in-house.
                "David Cohen" (Quality Director): The LinkedIn profile tied to them has been called out as potentially fake or AI-generated. No strong independent verification of credentials or a real lab team.
                Ties to vendors: Reverse DNS and other checks by skeptics suggest the domain is linked to some peptide-selling sites. This fuels suspicions it's more of a "friendly" testing mill for vendors wanting quick, high-purity-looking COAs rather than a fully independent lab. Some note that vendors switching to them suddenly get suspiciously high results.
                New and thin presence: Very young website, limited public info on staff/equipment/accreditation, and not much history. Scamadviser gives it a fair-but-not-great score mainly due to the newness.

                RandyR 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • RandyR Offline
                  RandyR Offline
                  Randy
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  package dropped off 🙂

                  "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • gym.ratG gym.rat

                    Main Concerns

                    Shared workspace / virtual address: Their listed location (Deerfield/Buffalo Grove, IL area, e.g., 570 Lake Cook Rd Suite 300 PMB) points to a coworking space or mailbox service rather than a proper equipped analytical lab. This is a common setup for low-overhead operations but raises doubts about having full HPLC, LC-MS, endotoxin, sterility, and heavy metals capabilities in-house.
                    "David Cohen" (Quality Director): The LinkedIn profile tied to them has been called out as potentially fake or AI-generated. No strong independent verification of credentials or a real lab team.
                    Ties to vendors: Reverse DNS and other checks by skeptics suggest the domain is linked to some peptide-selling sites. This fuels suspicions it's more of a "friendly" testing mill for vendors wanting quick, high-purity-looking COAs rather than a fully independent lab. Some note that vendors switching to them suddenly get suspiciously high results.
                    New and thin presence: Very young website, limited public info on staff/equipment/accreditation, and not much history. Scamadviser gives it a fair-but-not-great score mainly due to the newness.

                    RandyR Offline
                    RandyR Offline
                    Randy
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @gym.rat ooo this is interesting...

                    "If it doesnt come in a needle. It doesn't work"

                    gym.ratG 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • V Offline
                      V Offline
                      vpeptides
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      ...provided that they won't read this thread...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • RandyR Randy

                        @gym.rat ooo this is interesting...

                        gym.ratG Offline
                        gym.ratG Offline
                        gym.rat
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @Randy I'll add more to it. The founder cannot be found or verified either. All I can dig up is a trademark on the name. If you have nothing to hide, why hide so hard? I have little doubt they are buddy buddy with some (one or many) pep vendors and thus likely cutting corners, etc, assuming the testing is even legit. So much for independent testing.

                        Jano did a video tour with an X reporter. Huge difference in transparency. Labs also cost millions of dollars to carry out proper testing. I'm pretty confident Kovera is a scam on some level.

                        S P 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • V Offline
                          V Offline
                          vpeptides
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          or FDA Kover-up operation

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • WisGal64W Offline
                            WisGal64W Offline
                            WisGal64
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13
                            This post is deleted!
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • WisGal64W Offline
                              WisGal64W Offline
                              WisGal64
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              Search Kovera on X. Interesting debate/conversation/investigation going on

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • gym.ratG Offline
                                gym.ratG Offline
                                gym.rat
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                I'm telling you all, Kovera is complete BS.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gym.ratG Offline
                                  gym.ratG Offline
                                  gym.rat
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Glacier even admits to photoshopped testing being sent to them. I need to start a real lab company. That's what is really missing in this niche industry.

                                  WisGal64W 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • WisGal64W Offline
                                    WisGal64W Offline
                                    WisGal64
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    IMG_2345.jpeg

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gym.ratG gym.rat

                                      Glacier even admits to photoshopped testing being sent to them. I need to start a real lab company. That's what is really missing in this niche industry.

                                      WisGal64W Offline
                                      WisGal64W Offline
                                      WisGal64
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @gym.rat said:

                                      Glacier even admits to photoshopped testing being sent to them. I need to start a real lab company. That's what is really missing in this niche industry.

                                      He’s calling out bad labs doing this. Not using the CoAs is how I interpreted that statement.

                                      gym.ratG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • WisGal64W WisGal64

                                        @gym.rat said:

                                        Glacier even admits to photoshopped testing being sent to them. I need to start a real lab company. That's what is really missing in this niche industry.

                                        He’s calling out bad labs doing this. Not using the CoAs is how I interpreted that statement.

                                        gym.ratG Offline
                                        gym.ratG Offline
                                        gym.rat
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @WisGal64 Correct. Not Glacier's fault and the fact they are engaging is a good thing. Which "lab" is the question and how many of these labs cut corners b/c they have no shortage of vendors begging them to test product. The way to catch them would be to buy and retest.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • gym.ratG Offline
                                          gym.ratG Offline
                                          gym.rat
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20

                                          I also want to be clear that I've got like 10 vials of Glacier product that I'm either actively researching or in freezer storage. Their MT-1, Reta, NAD+, GHK-CU are working exactly as they should.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups