Peptide Critic Community

I thought I remember seeing a product on here at one point that you could pour desiccant beads into that would fit into a 3 ml slot on a hydrapeak insert. Does anyone know where I could find those? I’ve looked on Amazon and Etsy but can’t seem to locate any. Thank you!

I would recommend an average of all know tests for the vials, not just vendor COA, but 3p tests as well, if you know those numbers. I recently was part od a buy that was tested by three groups, and at 3 different labs, with a total of 9 vials. I know that’s a little bit of an extreme, but I averaged them all out. However, IF you do see an outlier with a crazy high or low number, it might not be best to factor that figure in.

@WisGal64 they are purple specs. Just didn’t know if that is what splash back looks like or if I should be more concerned about it being moisture. The one vial I reconstituted did still have what appeared to be normal vacuum.

I noticed my GHK-cu vials have this accumulation on the sides of the vials. Should I assume moisture has gotten into the vials and they are no longer good?

@randy First off, thank you so much for this extremely valuable research,. It has changed my perspective on purchasing peptides in larger quantity vials. Although given the appearance of value, the degradation is definitely a factor, especially with Mots-C! My question is, although it’s not the exactly the same, can we assume that Reta might behave in a “similar” fashion to Tirzepatide?

@MyB Thank you, that is exactly the information I was looking for, much appreciated!!

@Juan-Doe My QR codes work, even on holographic paper, which makes it more challenging to read in general. I found the trick was to use a site like bitly.com to produce a shortened url for the original QR code, which simplifies the QR pattern and makes it easier for the camera to read. It works very well.

I have been super happy with the M2. Using a combo of Grok and ChatGPT… I was able to create a fun, fake company name, design a label, add the QR code, and any other info. I use this as a base template and add/modify info as needed. I was planning to do the color route, but was more than pleased with the outcome of this instead.

I also researched with TB500… honestly all I noticed was an increase in cherry angiomas, those little red dots that look similar to moles… which is most likely due to the increase in angiogenesis. Having said that, I am strongly considering ordering TB4 if it’s still available during the next Aavant drop, especially since the 01 (yellow cap) batch has already been tested and verified though the Aavant test group on TG. I am interested to see if there is a noticeable difference.

I’m interested in researching with PT-141 and have heard some instances of using it mixed in a nasal solution. Does anyone have any experience or feedback with this method? I am thinking it would just be one less injection into the rat and more discrete also. Thanks!

@Commander Any idea what the approximate vial capacity on these are with inserts being made? They seem smaller than the Hydrapeaks, at least by the ounce description, but I like the idea of lasting longer during a power loss/defrost.

@Randy Fantastic, thank you!

In your experiences, what is the preferred temperature and method to store bac water. I just bought 30 vials of hospira and was wondering just how sensitive it is to temperature and light. I know not to freeze , but does it need to be refrigerated long term?

Cannot believe how easy that was to order, amazing setup and a great price. Hopefully they offer more variety in the late April drop!

@Randy Thank you! I appreciate the response very much!!

I’ve not ordered from Aavant before… when using their Bot to order, do you just start typing what you want to @aavant_bot and follow the prompts, or is there a command you need to type (like “/start”) to get it going?

I see Nexaph’s newest batch of MOTS-C returned from the lab at 98.5% purity. As a result, they are offering a 20% discount on it. What are your thoughts? Is a $50 discount on a kit worth 0.5% or so less purity? They said it’s in the “acceptable range” still… and I see most grey market vendors won’t offer refunds until it’s less than 98%. Just curious on how much of a difference this really is.

I completely agree with there rating system and poor grades for overfill, but for a single user with one kit, I was just hoping this was a semi-reasonable option for mass and purity assurance prior to use.

I know this is a debated topic, but just curious on people’s thoughts of Finnrick (Krause Analytical) for testing. I realize they aren’t the best of the best, and have had some issues with blind testing, but just wondered if it’s worth considering for testing on a batch… since they do free testing on some peptides.

I came across this one on TG, related to endotoxins as well

https://verify.janoshik.com/tests/108001-R10_Testers_ZHAJXU6GDTT8