I'm curious what other people are doing, when they are reconning a vial and the test they reference for that batch has multiple vials that were tested. Obviously when multiple vials are tested, there will be a different amount in each vial. Personally, I use the mean average of all 3 samples as my target MG for my dosage. I figure that's about as good as any method given the variation shown in the tests. What are you doing for your research?
Rain
H2S here. It was my third FDM printer, and I'll never go with anything else after this one. chef's kiss
@jackie so you mix directly from the reconstituted vial with the HA from The Ordinary in a solution that gets you around 2% GHK?
My friends all know me as "the peptide guy", and one of them is asking about skin health / wrinkle reduction peptides. I know that GHK-Cu is the gold standard, but he is asking about peptides that are used by topical application. My research tiger has never used any of these, and I know that I've heard of some peptide that can be applied directly to the skin but wasn't sure if there were some that are better than others for this use case. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated!
I'd like to find smaller vials, like 5-10ml since I'm not using very many peptides at a time. 30ml has a lot of waste if I toss the bottle after 30 days...
@MyB thanks for the reply, I'll definitely use that calculator for reconstituting the peptide. I was just confused with one resource saying that you should still use the milligram dosage on the vial and another resource saying that it's actually an overfill.
I've been using peptides from various vendors for a little while, but this will be my first time using reta. I purchased vials from a vendor, not one listed on your site as I only found your site after my purchase.
The vendor has the test results from freedom diagnostics, and things look good, except for the Net Peptide Content. I'm in the middle of your video "what's really in your peptide vial", and I got to the part where you were talking about over/under filling. The test results from my vendor for my batch, show a Net Peptide Content of 27.40 MG. I had noticed this number before I purchased the peptide, and after a little research, it seemed like that number meant there were other materials within the powder, such as salts and other items from the dehydration process. Now after seeing your video, I wanted to get a sanity check on this number, and if I need to make other calculations on my reconstitution of this peptide before use. Especially with this compound I didn't want to take any chances.
Anyway, any advice would be helpful.
