@Peptide-Warehouse-Austra This criticism is hard to take seriously when your own website does the exact thing you’re accusing others of doing.
You claim discussing peptides in a way that could be interpreted as personal use conflicts with a “research only” position, yet your site is filled with images of injury recovery, skincare, wellness, and articles highlighting what peptides are “studied for” in ways that clearly imply real-world benefits.
Slapping “research” on the page doesn’t change the fact that the overall presentation is aimed at the same audience you’re criticizing.
If discussing potential applications and outcomes is evidence of encouraging personal use, then by your own standard your website isn’t exactly standing on higher ground.